References
- Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
- Mittelmark MB, Sagy S, Eriksson M, Bauer GF, Pelikan JM, Lindström B, et al, editors. The handbook of salutogenesis. Cham, CH: Springer, 2017.
- Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:725–33. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-z.
- Eriksson M, Lindström B. Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:460–6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.018085.
- Paika V, Ntountoulaki E, Papaioannou D, Hyphantis T. The Greek version of the Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-29): psychometric properties and associations with mental illness, suicidal risk and quality of life. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry. 2017;7:10. doi: 10.15406/jpcpy.2017.07.00449.
- Bonacchi A, Miccinesi G, Galli S, Chiesi F, Martire M, Guazzini M, et al. The dimensionality of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scales: an investigation with Italian samples. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2012;19:115–34. doi: 10.4473/TPM19.2.4.
- Frenz AW, Carey MP, Jorgensen RS. Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. Psychol Assess. 1993;5:145–53. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.145.
- Spadoti Dantas RA, Silva FS, Ciol MA. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese versions of the 29- and 13-item scales of the Antonovsky’s sense of coherence (SOC-29 and SOC-13) evaluated in Brazilian cardiac patients. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23:156–65. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12157.
- Stern B, Socan G, Rener-Sitar K, Kukec A, Zaletel-Kragelj L. Validation of the Slovenian version of short sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC-13) in multiple sclerosis patients. Zdr Varst. 2019;58:31–9. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2019-0004.
- Geuens N, Braspenning M, Van Bogaert P, Franck E. Individual vulnerability to burnout in nurses: the role of Type D personality within different nursing specialty areas. Burnout Res. 2015;2:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.burn.2015.05.003.
- Hudek-Knezević J, Kalebić Maglica B, Krapić N. Personality, organizational stress, and attitudes toward work as prospective predictors of professional burnout in hospital nurses. Croat Med J. 2011;52:538–49. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.538.
- Dobnik M, Maletič M, Skela-Savič B. Work-related stress factors in nurses at Slovenian hospitals - a cross-sectional study. Zdr Varst. 2018;57:192–200. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2018-0024.
- Starc J. Stress factors among nurses at the primary and secondary level of public sector health care: the case of Slovenia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:416–22. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.100.
- Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Leocadio MC, Van Bogaert P, Cummings GG. Stress and ways of coping among nurse managers: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:1346–59. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14165.
- Malagón-Aguilera MC, Fuentes-Pumarola C, Suñer-Soler R, Bonmatí-Tomàs A, Fernández-Peña R, Bosch-Farré C. The sense of coherence among nurses. Enferm Clin. 2012;22:214–8. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2012.06.002.
- Basinska MA, Andruszkiewicz A, Grabowska M. Nurses’ sense of coherence and their work related patterns of behaviour. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011;24:256–66. doi:10.2478/S13382-011-0031-1.
- Mijakoski D, Karadzinska-Bislimovska J, Milosevic M, Mustajbegovic J, Stoleski S, Minov J. Differences in burnout, work demands and team work between Croatian and Macedonian hospital nurses. Cogn Brain Behav. 2015;19:179–200.
- Kardum I, Hudek-Knežević J, Kola A. The relationship between the sense of coherence, the dimension of the five-factor personality model and the subjective health outcomes. Psihol Teme. 2005;14:79–94.
- Schmidt DR, Dantas RA. Analysis of validity and reliability of the adapted portuguese version of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence questionnaire among nursing professionals. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011;19:42–9. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692011000100007.
- Langius A, Björ vell H. Salutogenic model and utilization of the KASAM form (Sense of Coherence) in nursing research - a methodological report. Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk. 1996;16:28–32. doi: 10.1177/010740839601600106.
- Howitt D, Cramer D. Introduction to statistics in psychology. 3rd ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2005.
- Schmitt TA. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2011;29:304–21. doi: 10.1177/0734282911406653.
- Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull.1985;97:562–82. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562.
- Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
- Zaletel-Kragelj L, Pahor M, Bilban M. Identification of population groups at very high risk for frequent perception of stress in Slovenia. Croat Med J. 2005;46:137–45.
- Rivera-Torres P, Araque-Padilla RA, Montero-Simo MJ. Job stress across gender: the importance of emotional and intellectual demands and social support in women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:375–89. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010375.
- Ferligoj A, Leskošek K, Kogovšek T. Methodological notes 10: reliability and validity of measurement. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, FDV, 1995.
- Racic M, Todorovic R, Ivkovic N, Masic S, Joksimovic B, Kulic M. Self-Perceived stress in relation to anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life among health professions students: a cross-sectional study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Zdr Varst. 2017;56:251–9. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2017-0034.