References
- López JP, Boix P, Sanchez PA, Boracchia A. Morphological Characterization of the Anterior Palatine Region Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; e459–64.
- Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Yalçın ED, Aktan AM. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019; 78(1): 153–162.
- Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Uribe R, García B. The nasopalatinecanal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in theseverely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants. 2009; 24(5): 936–942.
- Costa EDD, Nejaim Y, Martins LAC, Peyneau PD, Ambrosano GMB, Oliveira ML. Morphological Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Patients With Different Facial Profiles and Ages. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; (4): 721–729.
- Mardinger O, Namani SN, Chaushu G, Schwartz AD. Morphologic Changes of the Nasopalatine Canal Related to Dental Implantation: A Radiologic Study in Different Degrees of Absorbed Maxillae. J Periodontol. 2008; 79 (9): 1659–1662.
- Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi, K, Al-Shawaf R, Karabulut E, Wang, H.L, Tözüm TF. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (9): 1023–1026.
- Liang X, Jacobs R., Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M, Lambrichts I. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36 (7): 598–603.
- Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36 (8): 805–812.
- Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Rahimian S, Kheirkhahi M, Manouchehri, ME. Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Anatomic Variations Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a Group of Iranian Population. Iran J Radiol. 2017; 14(1): e13480.
- Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000. 2016; 73(1): 84–102.
- Mounir M, Beheiri G, El-Beialy W. Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43(11): 1373–1380.
- Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontology 2000. 2018; 77(1): 197–212.
- Al-Amery SM, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, John J, Ngeow WC. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0117251.
- Salemi F. Moghadam FA, Shakibai, Z, Farhadian M. Three-dimensional Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Surrounding Bone Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J. Periodontol. Implant Dent. 2016; 8(1): 1–7.
- Panda M, Shankar T, Raut A, Dev S, Kar AK, Hota S. Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18(4): 356–363.
- Soumya P, Koppolu P, Pathakota, KR, Chappidi V. Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Radiol Res Pract. 2019; 2019: 6151253.
- Peñarrocha D, Candel E, Guirado JLC, Canullo L, Peñarrocha M. Implants Placed in the Nasopalatine Canal to Rehabilitate Severely Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Study with Long Follow-up. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40(6): 699–706.
- McCrea SJJ. Aberrations Causing Neurovascular Damage in the Anterior Maxilla during Dental Implant Placement. Case Rep Dent. 2017; 2017: 5969643.
- Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van CJ, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(6): 396–402.
- Canto G. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 124(4): 432–440.e5.
- Wanner L, Ludwig U, Hövener JB, Nelson K, Flügge T. Magnetic resonance imaging-a diagnostic tool for postoperative evaluation of dental implants: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 125(4): e103–e107.
- Sahota J, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Singh V, Soni J, Soni R. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18(8): 665–669.
- Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1): 88.
- Alkanderi A, Al Sakka Y, Koticha T, Li J, Masood F, Suárez-López Del Amo F. Incidence of nasopalatine canal perforation in relation to virtual implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22(1): 77–83.
- Thakur AR, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur VG. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013; 43(4): 273–281.
- Kajan ZD, Kia J, Motevasseli S, Rezaian SR. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal with cone-beam computed tomography in an Iranian population. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015; 12(1): 14–19.
- Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker-Acay M, Çalişkan A, Sakarya G, Soysal N, Cimbar M, Özbek M. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016; 97(11): 1165–1172.
- Hakbilen S, Magat G. Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018; 77(3): 527–535.