Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnosis-Specific Group CBT Treating Social Anxiety in Adolescents: A Feasibility Study Cover

Diagnosis-Specific Group CBT Treating Social Anxiety in Adolescents: A Feasibility Study

Open Access
|Aug 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Overview of the Cool Kids Social Enhanced Program

Session numberParticipantsSession contentHomework practice tasks
S-1T, Y, P- Rapport building
- Psychoeducation
- Worry scale
- SMART goals
- Complete “Getting to know anxiety”
S-2T, Y, P- Continue rapport building
- Introduce link between thoughts & feelings
- Introduce attention training
- Review parent goals
- Attention training
- Linking thoughts and feelings
S-3T, Y, P- Introduce cognitive restructuring (detective thinking)
- Introduce rewards
- Attention training continued
- Detective thinking
- Rewards menu
S-4T, Y, P- Detective thinking to cost
- Introduce avoidance
- Introduce behavioral experiments
- Conduct in session experiment
- Detective thinking incl. cost
- 2-4 planned experiments should be implemented
- Attention training continued
S-5T, P- Parenting an adolescent with SAD- Changing my response as a parent
- Continue detective thinking
- Continue experiment practice
- Attention training continued
S-6T, Y, P- Introduce safety traps
- Review experiments
- Introduce experiments to reduce safety behaviors
- Conduct in session experiment
- Introduce task focused attention
- Conduct 2-4 planned experiments that focus on undoing safety traps
- Continue detective thinking
- Task attention practice
S-7T, Y, P- Review safety trap experiments and task-focused attention - Conduct the video-feedback experiment - Introduce the importance of obtaining an accurate self-perception - Obtaining accurate self-perception using feedback - Conduct additional in session experiments- Implement min. 2-4 planned experiments using feedback in the recording form - Daily experiment practice - Use detective evidence sheet as supplement to the experiments - Continue task-focus attention training
S-8T, Y, P- Review and revise experiments that utilize feedback
- Introduce post-event processing (detective thinking AFTER a situation)
- Introduce cost experiments
- Conduct in-session exposure (including an extra challenge experiment)
- Daily experiment practice (incl. min. 2-4 planned extra challenge experiments)
- Post-event detective thinking
- Continue task-focus attention training
S-9T, Y, P- Review and revise extra challenge experiments and post-event detective thinking
- In session experiments
- Troubleshooting experiments [PARENT ONLY]
- Optional MODULE: Dealing with teasing and bullying
- Daily experiments (including large experiments)
- Continue task-focus attention training
- Parent task: complete the reviewing foals worksheet
- Optional module: Role play new ways of interacting with bullies
S-10T, Y, P- Review of goals
- Maintenance of gains/setbacks
- Future plans
- Continue to practice skills
BoosterT, Y,P- Focusing on maintaining and continuing the progress.
- Advise possible further help.
- Continue to practice skills

[i] P = Parent; S: Session; T: Therapist; Y: Youth.

Figure 1

Flow Diagram of Response and Completion Rate

Table 2

Treatment Satisfaction at Post-Intervention

Not TruePartly TrueCertainly True
The treatment helped me/my childYouth03 (25%)9 (75%)
Mother04 (31%)9 (69%)
Father03 (33%)7 (67%)
We feel better in the family now than before treatmentYouth3 (25%)6 (50%)3 (25%)
Mother04 (31%)9 (69%)
Father02 (20%)8 (80%)
If a friend needed similar help, I would recommend theYouth011 (92%)1 (8%)
treatmentMother0013 (100%)
Father01 (10%)9 (90%)
I trusted the therapistYouth02 (17%)10 (83%)
Mother0013 (100%)
Father01 (10%)9 (90%)
The therapist had an understanding of my worries and issuesYouth03 (25%)9 (75%)
After treatment I felt like being with my friends moreYouth2 (16%)5 (42%)5 (42%)
The treatment helped me (the parent)Mother02 (15%)11 (85%)
Father1 (10%)2 (20 %)7 (70%)
I have been given enough information about the purposeMother01 (8%)12 (92%)
and course of treatment prior to the startFather02 (20%)8 (80%)
During the treatment I managed to change my behaviorMother03 (23%)10 (77%)
towards my child in a positive wayFather01 (10%)9 (90%)
During the treatment I got a better understanding of myMother0013 (100%)
child’s psychological well-beingFather01 (10%)9 (90%)
The treatment made me/my child feel worseYouth11 (92%)1 (8%)0
Mother13 (100%)00
Father10 (100%)00
The treatment made me (the parent) feel worseMother13 (100%)00
Father10 (100%)00

[i] Data presented as n (%)

Table 3

Mean Scores, Standard Deviations and Effect-Sizes

OutcomeRespondentBaselinePost intervention3 month follow-up1 year follow-upBaseline - post intervention: effect sizePost - 1 year follow-up: effect size
ADIS-IV: CSR on SADCSR rating*6.23 (0.44)
n = 13
5.58 (0.79)
n = 12
4.77 (1.83)
n = 13
-d = 1.02d = 0.59
SCAS totalYouth53 (16.81)
n = 13
35.33 (13.74)
n = 12
37.22 (13.09)
n = 9
39 (22.09)
n = 8
d = 1.15d = -0.21
Mother48.46 (15.03)
n = 13
34.85 (16.09)
n = 13
30.08 (13.92)
n = 12
33.83 (21.32)
n = 12
d = 0.87d = 0.05
Father43.09 (10.27)
n = 11
34.7 (16.57)
n = 10
25.5 (7.93)
n = 8
29.71 (15.51)
n = 7
d = 0.62d = 0.31
SCAS social phobiaYouth12.77 (3.24)
n = 13
8.75 (3.44)
n = 12
9.44 (3.09)
n = 9
9.63 (4.34)
n = 8
d = 1.2d = -0.23
subscaleMother14.23 (2.52)
n = 13
11.77 (3.52)
n = 13
10.92 (4.14)
n = 12
10.75 (4.29)
n = 12
d = 0.80d = 0.26
Father13.36 (2.01)
n = 11
11.6 (3.06)
n = 10
10.88 (3.44)
n = 8
10.43 (1.72)
n = 7
d = 0.69d = 0.45
CALIS totalYouth19.46 (5.64)
n =13
13.67 (6.75)
n = 12
14.56 (5.46)
n = 9
16.88 (10.09)
n = 8
d = 0.93d = -0.39
Mother37.69 (8.45)
n = 13
30 (10.65)
n = 13
25.17 (13.13)
n = 12
26.08 (13.21)
n = 12
d = 0.80d = 0.33
Father35.27 (9.26)
n = 11
31.4 (9.72)
n = 10
22.75 (7.05)
n = 8
27.29 (13.59)
n = 7
d = 0.41d = 0.36
MFQYouth12.62 (7.18)
n = 13
9.67 (7.29)
n = 12
9.22 (7.16)
n = 9
12.5 (9.15)
n = 8
d = 0.41d = -0.35
Mother9.62 (6.45)
n =13
8.23 (7.01)
n = 13
7.08 (8.34)
n = 12
7.33 (6.96)
n = 12
d = 0.21d = 0.13
Father6.55 (3.56)
n = 11
4.8 (3.39)
n = 10
4.63 (4.60)
n = 8
3.29 (2.36)
n = 7
d = 0.50d = 0.50
SEQ totalYouth59.62 (11.33)
n = 13
69.25 (14.45)
n = 12
69.11 (14.08)
n = 9
63.88 (20.29)
n = 8
d = 0.75d = -0.32
SAFEYouth91.62 (16.19)
n = 13
78.5 (12.99)
n = 12
75.33 (18.70)
n = 9
73.63 (16.13)
n = 8
d = 0.89d = 0.34
CATS totalYouth34.46 (20.56)
n = 13
22.08 (17.07)
n = 12
22.44 (20.30)
n = 9
26.13 (23.53)
n = 8
d = 0.65d = -0.20
FAQ self-focusYouth17.38 (4.05)
n = 13
13.92 (3.70)
n = 12
13.89 (5.09)
n = 9
14.75 (6.23)
n = 8
d = 0.89d = -0.17
FAQ external focusYouth14.38 (2.47)
n =13
13.67 (1.67)
n = 12
13 (3.16)
n = 9
14.25 (3.65)
n = 8
d = 0.34d = -0.22
PTQYouth36.92 (11.94)
n =13
27.75 (13.46)
n = 12
23.67 (16.48)
n = 9
23.75 (17.38)
n = 8
d = 0.72d = 0.26
DASS anxietyMother3.38 (5.20)
n = 13
1.69 (2.78)
n = 13
2.92 (3.68)
n = 12
3.17 (3.97)
n = 12
d = 0.41d = -0.43
DASS depressionMother6.08 (10.77)
n = 13
2.92 (3.88)
n = 13
4.67 (7.34)
n = 12
4.25 (6.22)
n = 12
d = 0.39d = -0.26
DASS stressMother8.38 (7.7)
n =13
8.38 (6.97)
n = 13
7.67 (8.05)
n = 12
8.5 (7.70)
n = 12
d = 0.0d = -0.02
DASS anxietyFather1.64 (3.56)
n = 11
1.6 (2.76)
n = 10
0.38 (0.74)
n = 8
0.14 (0.38)
n = 7
d = 0.01d = 0.68
DASS depressionFather3.27 (8.66)
n = 11
4.4 (6.88)
n = 10
5.75 (8.53)
n = 8
2.86 (2.85)
n = 7
d = -0.14d = 0.27
DASS stressFather4.09 (4.74)
n = 11
4.7 (4.37)
n = 10
4.25 (3.11)
n = 8
2.29 (2.63)
n = 7
d = -0.13d = 0.64

[i] Data presented as mean (SD). * = ADIS interview and CSR rating completed at baseline, post and 3-month follow-up. Therefore, no data represented at 1-year follow-up and effect sizes are calculated from post to 3-month follow-up.

Table 4

Estimated Slopes (Change) from Baseline- to Post Intervention and Post Intervention to 1-Year Follow-Up

OutcomeRespondentBaseline to post intervention β [95% CI]Post intervention to 1-year follow-up β [95% CI]
SCAS totalYouth-1.44 [-1.78, -1.10]***0.08 [-0.15, 0.30]
Mother-1.18 [-1.59, -0.77]***0.02 [-0.13, 0.17]
Father-0.82 [-1.41, -0.23]**0.04 [-0.16, 0.24]
SCAS social phobia subscaleYouth-0.29 [-0.41, -0.17]***0.02 [-0.04, 0.08]
Mother-0.21 [-0.33, -0.09]***-0.01 [-0.05, 0.03]
Father-0.14 [-0.28, -0.00]*-0.02 [-0.06, 0.02]
CALIS totalYouth-0.44 [-0.60, -0.27]***0.06 [-0.06, 0.18]
Mother-0.71 [-1.12, -0.31]***-0.05 [-0.19, 0.09]
Father-0.54 [-1.00, -0.08]*-0.05 [-0.25, 0.16]
MFQYouth-0.28 [-0.45, -0.10]**0.07 [-0.01, 0.14]
Mother-0.12 [-0.33, 0.09]0.00 [-0.06, 0.06]
Father-0.11 [-0.27, 0.05]-0.02 [-0.07, 0.03]
SEQ totalYouth0.74 [0.42, 1.05]***-0.07 [-0.24, 0.09]
SAFEYouth-1.07 [-1.50, -0.64]***-0.09 [-0.25, 0.06]
CATS totalYouth-1.02 [-1.39, -0.65]***0.11 [-0.06, 0.27]
FAQ - self focusYouth-0.30 [-0.42, -0.17]***0.01 [-0.07, 0.08]
FAQ - external focusYouth-0.08 [-0.18, 0.02]0.01 [-0.04, 0.06]
PTQYouth-0.76 [-1.18, -0.34]***-0.05 [-0.18, 0.09]
DASS anxietyMother-0.08 [-0.23, 0.06]0.04 [0.00, 0.08]
DASS depressionMother-0.16 [-0.41, 0.09]0.05 [-0.02, 0.12]
DASS stressMother-0.01 [-0.26, 0.25]0.02 [-0.07, 0.10]
DASS anxietyFather--
DASS depressionFather0.10 [-0.10, 0.30]-0.02 [-0.11, 0.07]
DASS stressFather0.05 [-0.14, 0.24]-0.04 [-0.10, 0.02]

[i] The subscale for DASS anxiety for fathers did not converge. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001

Language: English
Page range: 89 - 101
Published on: Aug 30, 2022
Published by: Center for Evidence-based Psychiatry
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Thea Nørregaard Agersnap, Esben Hougaard, Morten Berg Jensen, Mikael Thastum, published by Center for Evidence-based Psychiatry
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.