Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Some Prospects of Libertarian Punishment Theory: Rejoinder to Blasco and Marcos Cover

Some Prospects of Libertarian Punishment Theory: Rejoinder to Blasco and Marcos

By: Walter E. Block  
Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. 1. Blasco, E. and D. Marcos. Nulla Libertarian Poena Sine NAP: Reexamination of Libertarian Theories of Punishment. Studia Humana 9 (2), 2020, pp. 83-89.10.2478/sh-2020-0016
  2. 2. Block, W. E., and W. Barnett II. Continuums. Journal Etica e Politica / Ethics & Politics 1, 2008, pp. 151-166.
  3. 3. Block, W. E. Libertarian Punishment Theory and Unjust Enrichment. Journal of Business Ethics 154, 1, 2019, pp. 103–108.10.1007/s10551-017-3469-7
  4. 4. Block, W. E. Libertarian Punishment Theory: Working for, and Donating to, the State. Libertarian Papers 1, 2009, pp. 1–31.
  5. 5. Block, W. E. Natural Rights, Human Rights, and Libertarianism. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74, 1, 2015, pp. 29–62.10.1111/ajes.12086
  6. 6. Block, W. E. Radical Libertarianism: Applying Libertarian Principles to Dealing with the Unjust Government, Part I, Reason Papers 27, Fall, 2004, pp. 113–130.
  7. 7. Block, W. E. The Non-Aggression Axiom of Libertarianism, LewRockwell.com, 17-Feb-2003. Available at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2003/02/walter-e-block/turning-their-coats-for-the-state [Accessed: May 20, 2022].
  8. 8. Block, W. E. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Guilt and Punishment for the Crime of Statism, In J. G. Hülsmann and S. N. Kinsella, Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Auburn, United States: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009, pp. 137–148.
  9. 9. Block W. E., and R. Whitehead. Taking the Assets of the Criminal to Compensate Victims of Violence, In W. E. Block and R. Whitehead, Philosophy of Law: The Supreme Court’s Need for Libertarian Law, New York, United States: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 417–442.10.1007/978-3-030-28360-5_14
  10. 10. Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Undated. “Guidelines for Arbitrators on how to approach the making of awards on interest.” https://www.ciarb.org/media/4218/2011-making-of-awards-on-interest.pdf
  11. 11. ICLG.com. 2021. “https://iclg.com/practice-areas/international-arbitration-laws-and-regulations/3-pre-award-interest-and-the-difference-between-interest-and-investment-returns.” August 20; https://iclg.com/practice-areas/international-arbitration-laws-and-regulations/3-pre-award-interest-andthe-difference-between-interest-and-investment-returns
  12. 12. Prejudgment and postjudgment interest rates. 2022. January 10; https://www.ontario.ca/page/prejudgment-and-postjudgment-interest-rates
  13. 13. Post Judgment Interest Rate. Undated. https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/fees/post-judgment-interest-rate
  14. 14. Rothbard, M. N. The Ethics of Liberty, Large Prin. New York, United States: New York University Press, 2014.
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 24
Published on: Jul 9, 2022
Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Walter E. Block, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.