Deontic Relationship in the Context of Jan Woleński’s Metaethical Naturalism

Tomasz Jarmużek; Mateusz Klonowski; Rafał Palczewski

doi:10.2478/sh-2020-0031

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Deontic Relationship in the Context of Jan Woleński’s Metaethical Naturalism

Studia Humana

Volume 9 (2020): Issue 3-4 (October 2020)

By: Tomasz Jarmużek, Mateusz Klonowski and Rafał Palczewski

Open Access

|Nov 2020

Abstract

In this paper, we indicate how Jan Woleński’s non-linguistic concept of the norm allows us to clarify the deontic relationship between sentences and the given normative system. A relationship of this kind constitutes a component of the metalogic of relating deontic logic, which subjects the logical value of the deontic sentence to the logical value of the constituent sentence and its relationship with a given normative system in the accessible possible worlds.

References

1. Carmo, J., and A. Jones. Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, In D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8, Springer Science+Business Media, 2002, pp. 147-264.10.1007/978-94-010-0387-2_4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Epstein, R. Relatedness and implication, Philosophical Studies 36 (2), 1979, pp. 137-173.10.1007/BF00354267
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Epstein, R. (with the assistance and collaboration of: W. Carnielli, I. D’Ottaviano, S. Krajewski, R. Maddux). The Semantic Foundations of Logic. Volume 1. Propositional Logics, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 1990.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Fagin, R., and J. Y. Halpern. Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 34, 1988, pp. 39-76.10.1016/0004-3702(87)90003-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Hilpinen, R. Deontic logic, In L. Goble (ed.), Blackwell guide to philosophical logic, Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd., 2001, pp. 159-182.10.1111/b.9780631206934.2001.00011.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Hilpinen, R., and P. McNamara. Deontic logic. A historical survey and introduction, In D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden and L. van der Torre (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, London: College Publications, 2013, pp. 3-136.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Hintikka, J. Deontic logic and its philosophical morals, In J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities, Dordrecht: Springer, 1969, pp. 184-214.10.1007/978-94-010-1711-4_9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Jadacki, J. J. The Polish 20th century philosophers’ contribution to the theory of imperatives and norms, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2), 2011, pp. 106-145.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Jarmużek, T. Relating semantics as fine-grained semantics for intensional propositional logics, In A. Giordani and J. Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition. Current Issues in Logical Semantics, London: Springer 2020, pp. 19-3610.1007/978-3-030-53487-5_2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Jarmużek, T., and B. Kaczkowski, On some logic with a relation imposed on formulae. Tableau system F, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 43 (1/2), 2014, pp. 53-72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Jarmużek, T., and M. Klonowski, On logic of strictly-deontic modalities. A semantic and tableau Approach, Logic and Logical Philosophy 29 (3), 2020, pp. 335-380.10.12775/LLP.2020.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Jarmużek, T., and M. Klonowski. Some intensional logics defined by relating semantics and tableau systems, In A. Giordani and J. Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition. Current Issues in Logical Semantics, London: Springer, 2020, pp. 37-54.10.1007/978-3-030-53487-5_3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Jörgensen, J. Imperatives and logic, Erkenntnis 7, 1937, pp. 288-296.10.1007/BF00666538
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Opałek, K. Argumenty za nielingwistyczną koncepcją normy. Uwagi dyskusyjne, Studia Prawnicze 3–4, 1985, pp. 205-218.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Opałek, K., and J. Woleński. Logika i interpretacja powinności, Krakowskie Studia Prawnicze 21, 1988, pp. 13-29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Searle, J. How to derive ought from is, Philosophical Review 73 (1), 1964, pp. 43-58.10.2307/2183201
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Woleński, J. Spór o znaczenie normatywne, In Naturalistyczne i antynaturalistyczne interpretacje humanistyki, Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM, 1966, pp. 3-14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Woleński, J. Z zagadnień analitycznej filozofii prawa, Warszawa, Kraków: PWN, 1980 (Wydanie drugie, zmienione i rozszerzone: Kraków, Wydawnictwo Aureus, 2012).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Woleński, J. Naturalizm, antynaturalizm i metaetyka, Folia Philosophica 29, 2011, pp. 241-256.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Woleński, J. Próba naturalistycznej interpretacji norm i ocen, Etyka 50, 2015, pp. 29-47.10.14394/etyka.485
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Woleński, J. Wykłady o naturalizmie, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2020-0031 | Journal eISSN: 2299-0518

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 120 - 130

Published on: Nov 11, 2020

Published by: University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Political economics,

Political economics, other,

Mathematics,

Logic and set theory,

Philosophy,

Philosophy, other

© 2020 Tomasz Jarmużek, Mateusz Klonowski, Rafał Palczewski, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 9 (2020): Issue 3-4 (October 2020)