Reism, Concretism and Schopenhauer Diagrams

Lemanski, Jens; Dobrzański, Michał

Reism, Concretism and Schopenhauer Diagrams

Studia Humana

Volume 9 (2020): Issue 3-4 (October 2020)

By:

Jens Lemanski and Michał Dobrzański

Open Access

|Nov 2020

References

1. Ajdukiewicz, K., Elementy teorii poznaniaʻ Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, In T. Kotarbiński, Elementy teori poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, 1961, pp. 607-631.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Bellucci, F. Observational Advantages: A Philosophical Discussion, In P. Chapman, G. Stapleton, A. Moktefi, S. Perez-Kriz and F. Bellucci (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 10871), Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 330-335.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Beiser, F. C. Weltschmerz. Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860-1900, Oxford: University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198768715.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Birnbacher, D. Schopenhauer und die Tradition der Sprachkritik, Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (99), 2018, 37-56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Demey, L. From Euler Diagrams in Schopenhauer to Aristotelian Diagrams in Logical Geometry, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 181–206.10.1007/978-3-030-33090-3_12
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Dobrzański, M. Begriff und Methode bei Arthur Schopenhauer, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Dobrzański, M. Problems in Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Theory of Meaning: With Reference to His Influence on Wittgenstein, In J. Lemanski. (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 25-45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Dobrzański, M., and J. Lemanski. Schopenhauer Diagrams for Conceptual Analysis, In A.-V. Pietarinen, Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. 11th International Conference, Diagrams 2020 Tallinn, Estonia, August 24–28, 2020, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (vol. 12169), Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 281-288.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Fine, K. The Limits of Abstraction, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Garewicz, J. Schopenhauer, Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna, 1988.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Hauswald, R. Umfangslogik und analytisches Urteil bei Kant, Kant-Studien (101), 2010, pp. 283-308.10.1515/kant.2010.019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Juhos, B. Inwieweit ist Schopenhauer der Kantischen Ethik gerecht geworden? Wien: Phil. Diss., 1926.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Kleszcz, R. Criticism and Rationality in the Lvov-Warsaw School, In D. Kubok (ed.), Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean? The Tradition of Philosophical Criticism and Its Forms in the European History of Ideas, Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2018, pp. 161-172.10.1515/9783110567472-011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Koßler, M. Die eine Anschauung – der eine Gedanke. Zur Systemfrage bei Fichte und Schopenhauer, In L. Hühn (ed.), Die Ethik Arthur Schopenhauers im Ausgang vom Deutschen Idealismus (Fichte/Schelling), Würzburg: Ergon, 2006, pp. 349-364.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Koßler, M. Language as an ‘Indispensable Tool and Organ’ of Reason: Intuition, Concept and Word in Schopenhauer, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 15-24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Kotarbiński, T. Reism: Issues and Prospects, Logique et Analyse 11 (44), 1968, pp. 441-458.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Kotarbiński, T. Przedmowa, In A. Schopenhauer, Erystyka czyli sztuka prowadzenia sporów, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1973.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Lemanski, J. Schopenhauers Gebrauchstheorie der Bedeutung und das Kontextprinzip: Eine Parallele zu Wittgensteins 〉Philosophischen Untersuchungen〈, Schopenhauer Jahrbuch (97), 2016, pp. 171-195.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Lemanski, J. Means or End? On the Valuation of Logic Diagrams, Logiko-filosofskie studii (14), 2016, pp. 98–122.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Moktefi, A. Schopenhauer’s Eulerian diagrams, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 111-128.10.1007/978-3-030-33090-3_8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. McLaughlin, P., and O. Schlaudt. Kant’s Antinomies of Pure Reason and the ‘Hexagon of Predicate Negation’, Logica Universalis (14), 2020, pp. 51-67.10.1007/s11787-020-00240-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Schlick, M. Nietzsche und Schopenhauer, In M. Schlick (ed. Iven, M.), Gesamtausgabe: Abteilung II: Nachgelassene Schriften, vol. 5.1, Wien, New York: Springer, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Schopenhauer, A. Philosophische Vorlesungen. Vol. I, In A. Schopenhauer (ed. P. Deussen and F. Mockrauer), Schopenhauers sämtliche Werke. Vol. IX., München: Piper, 1913.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Schopenhauer, A. Philosophische Vorlesungen. Vol. II, In A. Schopenhauer (ed. P. Deussen and F. Mockrauer), Schopenhauers sämtliche Werke. Vol. X., München: Piper, 1913.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Schopenhauer, A. The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 1., translated and edited by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Schopenhauer, A. Der handschriftliche Nachlass: Bd. III. Berliner Manuskripte (1818-1830), ed. by A. Hübscher, Frankfurt a.M.: W. Kramer, 1970.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Schopenhauer, A. Parerga and Paralipomena. Vol. 2., transl. by A. Del Caro, C. Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.10.1017/9781139029636
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Stapleton, G., Jamnik, M., and A. Shimojima. What Makes an Effective Representation of Information: A Formal Account of Observational Advantages, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 26 (5), 2017, pp. 143-177.10.1007/s10849-017-9250-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Tennant, N. A General Theory of Abstraction Operators, The Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214), 2004, pp. 105-133.10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00344.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Woleński, J. The History of Epistemology, In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Wolenski (eds.) Handbook of Epistemology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2004, pp. 3-54.10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Woleński, J. Reism, In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/reism/ (11.05.2020).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Xhignesse, M.-A. Schopenhauer’s Perceptive Invective, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 95-109.10.1007/978-3-030-33090-3_7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Zaręba, M. Reizm Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego a prakseologiczna koncepcja sprawstwa, Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria 3 (83), 2012, pp. 559-575.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article