References
- Borowczyk, M., & Frankowski, Z. B. (1981). Dynamic and static sounding results interpretation. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Proc. 10th International Conference, Stockholm, June 1981. Vol. 2, (A.A. Balkema).
- EN1997-2:2007. Eurocode 7. Geotechnical design - Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. CEN, Brussels.
- Gruchot, A. (2019). Assessment of soil compaction and shear strength of the side dam of the Maziarnia water reservoir. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus, 18(3), 133–147.
https://doi.org/10.15576/asp.fc/2019.18.3.133 - Hawrysz, M., & Stróżyk, J. (2015). The controversial interpretation of dynamic probing results in engineering practice. Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika, 3, 203–207. (in Polish)
- Jamiolkowski, M., Leroueil, S., & lo Presti, D.C.F. (1991). Design parameters from theory to practice. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Coastal Development, Yokohama, Japan.
- Jamiolkowski, M., lo Presti, D. C. F., & Manassero, M. (2003). Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from CPT and DMT.
https://doi.org/10.1061/40659(2003)7 - Jamiolkowski, M., lo Presti, D.C.F., & Manassero, M. (2001). Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from cone penetration test (CPT) and flat dilatometer test (DMT). ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 119, 201–238.
- Koda, E., Tkaczyk, A., Lech, M., & Osiński, P. (2017). Application of Electrical Resistivity Data Sets for the Evaluation of the Pollution Concentration Level within Landfill Subsoil. Applied Sciences, 7(3):262,
https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030262 - Larsson, R. (1989). The dilatometer test for assessing soil layer sequences and properties in the ground. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Information No. 10. (in Swedish)
- Lech, M., Skutnik, Z., Bajda, M., & Markowska-Lech, K. (2020). Applications of Electrical Resistivity Surveys in Solving Selected Geotechnical and Environmental Problems. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(7):2263.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072263 - Marchetti, S. (1980). In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng, 106, 299–321.
- Marchetti, S. (1992). The Flat Dilatometer Test. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Publication No FHWA-SA-91-044.
- Marchetti, S., & Monaco, P. a. V. (2018). Recent improvements in the use, interpretation, and applications of DMT and SDMT in practice. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 41(5)
https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj2017038 - Mayne, P. W., Christopher, B. R., & DeJong, J. (2002). Subsurface Investigations — Geotechnical Site Characterization Reference Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NHI Course No. 132031, 132031.
- Meardi, G. (1971). Discussion: The Correlation of Cone Size in the Dynamic Cone Penetration Test with the Standard Penetration Test. Geotechnique, 21, 184–190.
- Młynarek, Z. (2013). Session report: Direct push-in in situ test. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Site Characterization 4, ISC-4, 1.
- Młynarek, Z., Wierzbicki, J., & Wołyński W. (2018). Use of functional cluster analysis of CPTU data for assessment of a subsoil rigidity. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 40(2): 117–124.
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2018-0017 - Młynarek, Z., Wierzbicki, J., & Lunne, T. (2021). Usefulness of the CPTU method in evaluating shear modulus G0 changes in the subsoil. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 43(3) 195–205.
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0008 - Nepelski, K. (2020). Interpretation of CPT and SDMT tests for Lublin loess soils exemplified by Cyprysowa research site. Budownictwo i Architektura, 18(3) 063–072.
https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.890 . - Pinheiro, C., Molina-Gómez, F., Rios, S., Viana da Fonseca, A., & Miranda, T. (2018). Correlations between Dynamic Penetrometer Light and Cone Penetration Tests in Intermediate Soils: a Statistical Comparison. XIX Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica Geotecnia e Desenvolvimento Urbano COBRAMSEG 2018, Brasil, 1–9.
- PN-B-04452:2002. Geotechnics. In situ investigations. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, Warsaw. (in Polish).
- Rabarijoely S. (2018). A New Approach to the Determination of Mineral and Organic Soil Types Based on Dilatometer Tests (DMT). Applied Sciences 8(11):2249.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112249 - Rabarijoely, S., Lech, M., & Bajda, M. (2021). Determination of Relative Density and Degree of Saturation in Mineral Soils Based on In Situ Tests. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 14(22), 6963.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226963 - Reynolds, J.M. (2011). An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. New 437 York.
- Tanaka, H., & Tanaka, M. (1998). Characterization of sandy soils using CPT and DMT. Soils and Foundations, 38(3).
https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.3_55 - Tarnawski M. (2010). The need for verification of the interpretation of dynamic tests. Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika, 31(3), 441–443. (in Polish)
- Totani, G., Marchetti, S., Monaco, P., & Calabrese, M. (2001). Use of the Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT) in geotechnical design. Intnl. Conf. On In situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Bali, Indonesia, 1–6.
- Ura, M., & Tarnawski, M. (2014). Interpretation of relative density of non-cohesive soils on the grounds of static and dynamic penetrometer results. Przegląd geologiczny, 62(10/2), 715–720 (in Polish).
- Virsis, E., Paeglitis, A., & Jateikienė, L. (2023). Analysis of Physical and Mechanical Soil Properties Determined Using Interpretations of Dilatometer Test (DMT) and Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Methods. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 18(2)
https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2023-18.605