Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:
![Deflections of the pavement for the selected sets of stiffnesses. From left: model A, model B. Deflections between (from 2.4 to 4.0) [m] are not recorded.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64737a3e4e662f30ba53f8da/j_sgem-2023-0016_fig_007.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251205%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251205T005703Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=5e3d6c20cafaa82cc59e22b1cb4b5a384e037af9dc2bb0e2948fd2d78e65df84&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 8:

Figure 9:

Figure 10:

Figure 11:

Figure 12:

Figure 13:

Figure 14:

Figure 15:

Figure 16:

Summary of data for the applied model of the layered pavement_
| Model A | Model B | Model C | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layer | hj [cm] | vj [-] | Ej [MPa] | hj [cm] | vj [-] | Ej [MPa] | hj [cm] | vj [-] | Ej [MPa] |
| W0 | 15÷25 | 0,2 | 32000 | 15÷25 | 0,2 | 32000 | 15÷25 | 0,2 | 32000 |
| W1 | 300 | 0,25 | 50÷200 | 100÷200 | 0,25 | 50÷200 | 20 | 0,17 | 9100÷13850 |
| W2 | - | - | - | 300 | 0,25 | 50÷200 | 380 | 0,25 | 50÷200 |