Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of fibre content on the geotechnical properties of peat Cover

Effect of fibre content on the geotechnical properties of peat

Open Access
|Mar 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Peatlands in Poland and the location of the study area (based on Majtyka, 2013).

Figure 2

Set of oedometers used for the tests.

Figure 3

The relation between organic content Iom and natural water content wn.

Figure 4

The relation between bulk density ρ and initial void ratio e0.

Figure 5

The relation between natural water content wn and the initial void ratio e0.

Figure 6

The relation between vertical strain ɛv and effective vertical stress σv′.

Figure 7

Vertical strain ɛv versus time t depending on the stress level σv for (a) fibric peat, (b) hemic peat, (c) sapric peat.

Figure 8

The relation between (a) void ratio e and effective vertical stress σv′ and (b) effective vertical stress σv′ and void ratio e.

Figure 9

The relation between compression index Cc and (a) natural water content wn and (b) initial void ratio e0.

Figure 10

Secondary compression index Cα versus compression index Cc.

Degree of decomposition of peat soil based on the von Post scale (Landva and Pheeney, 1980)_

Peat classificationDecompositionPlant structureMaterial extruded on squeezing (passing between fingers)
Fibric peatH1NoneEasily identifiedClear, colourless water
H2InsignificantEasily identifiedYellowish water
H3Very slightStill identifiableBrown, muddy water
H4SlightNot easily identifiedDark brown, muddy water
Hemic peatH5ModerateRecognisable, but vagueMuddy water and some peat
H6Moderately strongIndistinctAbout one-third of peat squeezed out, dark brown water
Sapric peatH7StrongFaintly recognisableAbout one-half of peat squeezed out, very dark brown water
H8Very strongVery indistinctAbout two-thirds of peat squeezed out, also some pasty water
H9Nearly completeAlmost unrecognisableNearly all the peat squeezed out as a paste
H10CompleteNo discernibleAll the peat passes between the fingers, no free water visible

Physical properties of the tested peat_

Peat designationP1P2P3P4P5P6P7P8
Depth of sampling (m)3.11.92.33.64.75.01.01.4
Bulk density ρ (g/cm3)1.0101.0451.0391.0291.0341.0311.1271.112
Particle density ρs (g/cm3)1.4431.4731.5301.4611.5241.4891.4741.492
Natural water content wn (%)828.3465.4335.7449.0315.8451.4236.5320.2
Organic content Iom (%)94.8690.7383.4292.3984.1688.5790.6188.23
Initial void ratio e0 (−)12.266.9695.4156.7945.1566.9633.3994.638
Degree of decompositionH3H5H6H5H6H5H8H7
Peat classificationFibricHemicSapric

Averaged values of the constrained modulus of the tested peat_

Vertical stress (kPa)Constrained modulus Eoed (kPa)

Fibric peatHemic peatSapric peat
15181.7266.9683.8
32111.6179.9321.5
64186.8224.7348.5
96327.4Not investigatedNot investigated
128Not investigated534.0428.0
256Not investigatedNot investigated738.9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 143
Submitted on: May 9, 2022
|
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2022
|
Published on: Mar 9, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Iwona Chmielewska, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.