Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comment On Energy-Efficient Alternative for Different Types of Traditional Soil Binders Cover

Comment On Energy-Efficient Alternative for Different Types of Traditional Soil Binders

By: Himanshu Jangde and  Farhan Khan  
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. Chang, I., et al., Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020. 24. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385
  2. S. Control et al., “EC-5 EC-5,” no. November, pp.1–8, 2009.
  3. Starry, T.E.K.a.D.W., Modern Soil Stabilization Techniques. 2007
  4. army, u., Military Soils Engineering, D.o.t. Army, Editor. 4 June 1997: Washington, DC.
  5. Soil Binders, s.w. services, Editor. 2008.
  6. Afrin, H., A Review on Different Types Soil Stabilization Techniques. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology, 2017. 3(2). DOI: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20170302.12
  7. Xu, D.-M., et al., Chemical stabilization remediation for heavy metals in contaminated soils on the latest decade: Available stabilizing materials and associated evaluation methods–A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021. 321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128730
  8. Imbabi, M.S., C. Carrigan, and S. McKenna, Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2012. 1(2): p. 194–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.001
  9. Aspin J. An improvement in the modes of producing an artificialstone. In: Patent ed., 5022:1824, UK, 1824.
  10. Toma, I.-O., et al., Strength and elastic properties of mortars with various percentages of environmentally sustainable mineral binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2013. 43: p. 348–361. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.061
  11. Harnisch, N.M.J., A blueprint for a climate friendly cement industry. 2012
  12. Xu, J.-H., et al., CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's cement industry compared to IEA's Cement Technology Roadmap up to 2050. Applied Energy, 2014. 130: p. 592–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.004
  13. Gartner, E.M. and D.E. Macphee, A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011. 41(7): p. 736–749. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.006
  14. Bell, F.G., Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Engineering Geology 42 (1996) 1996: p. 223–237
  15. Dash, S.K. and M. Hussain, Lime Stabilization of Soils: Reappraisal. 2012. 24(6): p. 707–714. DOI: doi:10.1061/(ASCE) MT.1943-5533.0000431
  16. Thyagaraj, T. and S. Zodinsanga, Laboratory Investigations of In Situ Stabilization of an Expansive Soil by Lime Precipitation Technique. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015. 27(7). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001184
  17. Hopkins, T.L.B.a.T.C., Stabilization of Subgrade Soil using Hydrated Lime Product. 1997
  18. Consoli, N.C., et al., Control factors for the long term compressive strength of lime treated sandy clay soil. Transportation Geotechnics, 2014. 1(3): p. 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.07.005
  19. Ola, S.A., The potentials of lime stabilization of lateritic soils. Engineering Geology, 1977. 11(4): p. 305–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(77)90036-9
  20. Zhao, H., et al., Reexamination of Lime Stabilization Mechanisms of Expansive Clay. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015. 27(1). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001040
  21. Amadi, A.A. and A. Okeiyi, Use of quick and hydrated lime in stabilization of lateritic soil: comparative analysis of laboratory data. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 2017. 8(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40703-017-0041-3
  22. source: https://www.pulpandpaper-technology.com/products/ankur-minerals/quick-lime-powder.
  23. Alzubaidi, R. and S.H. Lafta, Effect of Strain Rate on the Strength Characteristics of Soil–Lime Mixture. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2013. 31(4): p. 1317–1327. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-013-9653-3
  24. Cherian, C. and D.N. Arnepalli, A Critical Appraisal of the Role of Clay Mineralogy in Lime Stabilization. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2015. 1(1). DOI: 10.1007/s40891-015-0009-3
  25. Di Sante, M., et al., Influence of delayed compaction on the compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of soil–lime mixtures. Engineering Geology, 2015. 185: p. 131–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.005
  26. Mohanty, S., et al., Strength and durability of flyash, GGBS and cement clinker stabilized dispersive soil. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2021. 191: p. 103358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103358
  27. S, K.S.K. and N.N. Patil, Evaluation of strength, durability characteristics of Flyash, GGBFS and alccofine based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.290
  28. source: https://sodimate-inc.com/hydrated-lime/.
  29. TOMMY C. HOPKINS, T.L.B.a.D.Q.H., MODIFICATION OF IDGHWAY SOIL SUBGRADES. 1995
  30. Ullah, S., et al., Adsorption behavior of mercury over hydrated lime: Experimental investigation and adsorption process characteristic study. Chemosphere, 2021. 271: p. 129504. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129504
  31. Deng, X., et al., Effect of hydrated lime on structures and properties of decorative rendering mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. 256. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119485
  32. Das, A.K. and D. Singh, Evaluation of fatigue performance of asphalt mastics composed of nano hydrated lime filler. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 269. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121322
  33. Yilmaz, I. and B. Civelekoglu, Gypsum: An additive for stabilization of swelling clay soils. Applied Clay Science, 2009. 44(1): p. 166–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.01.020
  34. Divya Krishnan, K., et al., Study on Behaviour of Soil with Phosphogypsum as Stabiliser. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2016. 9(23). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/95980
  35. Liu, Y., G.Z. Li, and C.W. Du, Research on the Effects of Calcination Temperature on the Physical Properties of Titanium Gypsum. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014. 711: p. 189–192. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.711.189
  36. Survey, U.S.G., Miniral Commodities Summaries 2013. 2013.
  37. A. Mohammadi, M.D., Aff.M.ASCE, I. Shooshpasha and S. Asadollahi, Mechanical Properties of Sandy Soil Stabilized with Modified Sulfur. 2014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001059.
  38. B. CZARNECK, J.E.G., Effect of Different Admixtures on the Durability of Sulphur Concrete Made with Different Aggregates. Engineering Geology, 28 (1990) 105–118, 1989
  39. Alan, H.V., Sulfur Concrete Goes Global. Concrete International. 20(1)
  40. Grugel, R.N. and H. Toutanji, Sulfur “concrete” for lunar applications – Sublimation concerns. Advances in Space Research, 2008. 41(1): p. 103–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.08.018
  41. Vlahovic, M.M., et al., Durability of sulfur concrete in various aggressive environments. Construction and Building Materials, 2011. 25(10): p. 3926–3934. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.024
  42. Enayaty-Ahangar, T. and S. Motahari, Fiber Reinforcement of DCPD-Modified Sulfur Mortar. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014. 26(1): p. 1–5. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000778
  43. ABRAHAM, H., ASPHALTS AND ALLIED SUBSTANCES. 4 ed. 198.
  44. Raymond, M. and W.L. Leffler, Oil and Gas Production in Nontechnical Language. 2006: PennWell Corporation.
  45. Valentin, J., et al., A comprehensive study on adhesion between modified bituminous binders and mineral aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124686
  46. source: https://www.asphalt.com.au/why-asphalt/bitumen-vs-asphalt/.
  47. Shen, W., et al., Quantifying CO2 emissions from China's cement industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 50: p. 1004–1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.031
  48. Rolfe, A., et al., Technical and environmental study of calcium carbonate looping versus oxy-fuel options for low CO2 emission cement plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018. 75: p. 85–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.05.020
  49. Cao, Z., et al., Toward a better practice for estimating the CO2 emission factors of cement production: An experience from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. 139: p. 527–539. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.070
  50. Schuhmacher, M., J.L. Domingo, and J. Garreta, Pollutants emitted by a cement plant: health risks for the population living in the neighborhood. Environ Res, 2004. 95(2): p. 198–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.08.011
  51. Prisciandaro, M., G. Mazziotti, and F. Veglió, Effect of burning supplementary waste fuels on the pollutant emissions by cement plants: a statistical analysis of process data. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2003. 39(2): p. 161–184. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(02)00170-2
  52. Puppala, A.J., Advances in ground modification with chemical additives: From theory to practice. Transportation Geotechnics, 2016. 9: p. 123–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.08.004
  53. Bailey, H.K., ASPHALT REJUVENATION. 2009.
  54. G. S. Li, G.W.a.E.M.G., Formation and hydration of low-CO2 cements based on belite, calcium sulfoaluminate and calcium aluminoferrite. 2007
  55. Alvarez-Ayuso, E., et al., Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. J Hazard Mater, 2008. 154(1–3): p. 175–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.008
  56. Burduhos Nergis, D.D., et al., Geopolymers and Their Uses: Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018. 374. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/374/1/012019
  57. Al Makhadmeh, W.a. and A. Soliman, Effect of activator nature on property development of alkali-activated slag binders. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2020. 10(4): p. 240–256. DOI: 10.1080/21650373.2020.1833256
  58. Diaz Caselles, L., et al., Stabilization of soils containing sulfates by using alternative hydraulic binders. Applied Geochemistry, 2020. 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104494
  59. Du, Y.-J., et al., New phosphate-based binder for stabilization of soils contaminated with heavy metals: Leaching, strength and microstructure characterization. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014. 146: p. 179–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.035
  60. Jin, F., F. Wang, and A. Al-Tabbaa, Three-year performance of in-situ solidified/stabilised soil using novel MgO-bearing binders. Chemosphere, 2016. 144: p. 681–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.046
  61. Wang, D., H. Wang, and X. Wang, Compressibility and strength behavior of marine soils solidified with MgO—A green and low carbon binder. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2016. 35(6): p. 878–886. DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2016.1258095
  62. Feng, Y.-S., et al., Performance of two novel binders to stabilize field soil with zinc and chloride: Mechanical properties, leachability and mechanisms assessment. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 189: p. 1191–1199. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.072
  63. Zheng, W., et al., A review on compatibility between crumb rubber and asphalt binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 297. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123820
  64. Chen, Y., et al., Evaluation of crumb rubber modification and short-term aging on the rutting performance of bioasphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 193: p. 467–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.192
  65. Lei, Y., et al., Evaluation of the effect of bio-oil on the high-temperature performance of rubber modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 191: p. 692–701. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.064
  66. Wan Azahar, W.N.A., et al., The Potential of Waste Cooking Oil as Bio-Asphalt for Alternative Binder – an Overview. Jurnal Teknologi, 2016. 78(4). DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.8007
  67. Junaid, M., et al., Moisture susceptibility and fatigue performance of asphalt binder modified by bone glue and coal fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 308: p. 125135. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125135
  68. Huang, J., et al., A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685
  69. Hosseinpour, Z., et al., Synthesis of a biopolymer via a novel strain of Pantoea as a soil stabilizer. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021. 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100425
  70. Chang, I. and G.-C. Cho, Strengthening of Korean residual soil with β-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 2012. 30: p. 30–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.030
  71. Saleh, S., et al., Improving the strength of weak soil using polyurethane grouts: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 2019. 202: p. 738–752. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.048
  72. Correia, A.A.S., P.J. Venda Oliveira, and D.G. Custódio, Effect of polypropylene fibres on the compressive and tensile strength of a soft soil, artificially stabilised with binders. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015. 43(2): p. 97–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.008
  73. Almajed, A., et al., Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP)-Based methods for ecofriendly stabilization of different types of natural sands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122627
  74. Kushwaha, S.S., et al., Stabilization of Red mud using Eko soil enzyme for highway embankment. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018. 5(9): p. 20500–20512. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.427
  75. Feng, Y.S., et al., Geoenvironmental properties of industrially contaminated site soil solidified/stabilized with a sustainable by-product-based binder. Sci Total Environ, 2021. 765: p. 142778. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142778
  76. Brahmachary, T.K. and M. Rokonuzzaman, Investigation of random inclusion of bamboo fiber on ordinary soil and its effect CBR value. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 2018. 9(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40703-018-0079-x
  77. Lv, S., et al., Experimental investigation on the performance of bone glue and crumb rubber compound modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124734
  78. Rizvi, H.R., M.J. Khattak, and A.A. Gallo, Rheological and mechanistic characteristics of Bone Glue modified asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 2015. 88: p. 64–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.023
  79. Ramiandrisoa Antsa Lalaina, R., Andrianary Philipe, Rakotoarivonizaka Ignace, Study Of The Soil Stabilization Mechanism By Natural Stabilizers – Case Sweet Potato - Banana - Zebu Manure. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 2021. 25: p. 304–320
  80. Do, T.M., et al., Development of a new cementless binder for marine dredged soil stabilization: Strength behavior, hydraulic resistance capacity, microstructural analysis, and environmental impact. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 186: p. 263–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.130
  81. Yuan, Q., et al., Supercritical CO2 coupled with mechanical force to enhance carbonation of fly ash and heavy metal solidification. Fuel, 2022. 315: p. 123154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123154
  82. Mohd Nasir, N.H., et al., Development of composite material from Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate and fly ash: Four decades progress review. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022. 5: p. 100280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100280
  83. Fu, H., et al., Preparation, characterization and properties study of a superhydrophobic ceramic membrane based on fly ash. Ceramics International, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.014
  84. Ma, S., et al., Influence of alkali-resistant glass fiber on seismic performance of precast ceramsite concrete sandwich wall panels. Structures, 2022. 38: p. 94–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.081
  85. Rajesh, D., et al., Mechanical characterization of glass fiber and glass fiber reinforced with aluminium particulated polymer composite. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.202
  86. Patil, S., T.H. Patel, and E. Yashodha, The effect of rice husk ash, silica fume, and quarry dust on glass fibre reinforced concrete's strength properties. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.458
  87. Yan, R., et al., Damage evolution behavior of cold plasma treated glass fiber/vinyl ester resin composites under bending load by acoustic emission. Composites Communications, 2022. 30: p. 101075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2022.101075
  88. Ghadir, P., et al., Shear strength and life cycle assessment of volcanic ash-based geopolymer and cement stabilized soil: A comparative study. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021. 31. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100639
  89. Liu, L.-K., et al., Hydrothermal-processed volcanic ash-based geopolymers for immobilization of sodium salt wastes containing Cs. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2021. 158: p. 108251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108251
  90. Nana, A., et al., Mechanical strength and microstructure of metakaolin/volcanic ash-based geopolymer composites reinforced with reactive silica from rice husk ash (RHA). Materialia, 2021. 16: p. 101083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101083
  91. Aziz, A., et al., Effect of acidic volcanic perlite rock on physio-mechanical properties and microstructure of natural pozzolan based geopolymers. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2021. 15: p. e00712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00712
  92. Gobinath, R., et al., Studies on strength characteristics of black cotton soil by using novel SiO2 combination as a stabilizing agent. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020. 27: p. 657–663. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.597
  93. Naeem, I., et al., Prospective usage of magnesium potassium phosphate cement combined with Bougainvillea alba derived biochar to reduce Pb bioavailability in soil and its uptake by Spinacia oleracea L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2021. 208: p. 111723. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111723
  94. Yang, B., et al., Assessment of soils stabilized with lignin-based byproducts. Transportation Geotechnics, 2018. 17: p. 122–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.10.005
  95. Zhao, D., Reactive MgO-modified slag-based binders for cemented paste backfill and potential heavy-metal leaching behavior. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 298: p. 123894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123894
  96. Wang, Z., et al., Hydration properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag binders modified by MgO with different reactivity. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 44: p. 103252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103252
  97. Shah, V. and A. Scott, Use of kaolinite clays in development of a low carbon MgO-clay binder system. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021. 144: p. 106422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106422
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2022-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 72 - 87
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2022
|
Accepted on: Nov 17, 2022
|
Published on: Jan 25, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Himanshu Jangde, Farhan Khan, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.