Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical analysis of the transport of brine in the Odra River downstream of a mine's discharge Cover

Numerical analysis of the transport of brine in the Odra River downstream of a mine's discharge

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

(a) Examples of mixing zone for river discharges: (A) a traditional shoreline discharge, (B) a submerged offshore single-port discharge, (C) a regular perpendicular diffuser design and (D) a diffuser design for navigating rivers or rivers with other cross-sectional limitations. BMZ – the width of mixing zone, LMZ – the length of the mixing zone downstream. BMZ at distance LMZ must be greater than BMZ specified in the water legislation [4]. (b) Photo of a fragment of the discharge installation damaged by sediment (after disassembly).
(a) Examples of mixing zone for river discharges: (A) a traditional shoreline discharge, (B) a submerged offshore single-port discharge, (C) a regular perpendicular diffuser design and (D) a diffuser design for navigating rivers or rivers with other cross-sectional limitations. BMZ – the width of mixing zone, LMZ – the length of the mixing zone downstream. BMZ at distance LMZ must be greater than BMZ specified in the water legislation [4]. (b) Photo of a fragment of the discharge installation damaged by sediment (after disassembly).

Figure 2

A diagram of the flow of the KGHM mine water [13].
A diagram of the flow of the KGHM mine water [13].

Figure 3

The discharge system during construction.
The discharge system during construction.

Figure 4

Cross section of the discharge installation, dimensions in mm [14].
Cross section of the discharge installation, dimensions in mm [14].

Figure 5

The relationship between the flow of the Odra River and its natural salinity.
The relationship between the flow of the Odra River and its natural salinity.

Figure 6

Three-dimensional model of the Odra riverbed, with the brine outflow zone marked.
Three-dimensional model of the Odra riverbed, with the brine outflow zone marked.

Figure 7

Image of the brine concentration in the cross section at the end of the model: (a) grid 1 × 1 × 0.5 – 500,000 elements, (b) grid 0.67 × 0.67 × 0.31 – 1,912,500 elements and (c) grid 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.25 – 4,400,000 elements.
Image of the brine concentration in the cross section at the end of the model: (a) grid 1 × 1 × 0.5 – 500,000 elements, (b) grid 0.67 × 0.67 × 0.31 – 1,912,500 elements and (c) grid 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.25 – 4,400,000 elements.

Figure 8

Spatial distribution of chloride for low flow 41 m3 s−1 at elevation (a) 68.45, (c) 69.08, (e) 69.38 m asl and for high flow 318 m3 s−1 at elevation (b) 68.45, (d) 69.08, (f) 72.13 m asl.
Spatial distribution of chloride for low flow 41 m3 s−1 at elevation (a) 68.45, (c) 69.08, (e) 69.38 m asl and for high flow 318 m3 s−1 at elevation (b) 68.45, (d) 69.08, (f) 72.13 m asl.

Figure 9

Distribution of chloride in the cross section at the end of the model for flow values: (a) Qi = 41 m3 s−1, (b) Qi = 51 m3 s−1, (c) Qi = 77.2 m3 s−1, (d) Qi = 113 m3 s−1, (e) Qi = 169 m3 s−1 and (f) Qi = 318 m3 s−1.
Distribution of chloride in the cross section at the end of the model for flow values: (a) Qi = 41 m3 s−1, (b) Qi = 51 m3 s−1, (c) Qi = 77.2 m3 s−1, (d) Qi = 113 m3 s−1, (e) Qi = 169 m3 s−1 and (f) Qi = 318 m3 s−1.

Figure 10

Distribution of the concentration of brine in the outlet cross section for (a) Qi = 41 m3 s−1 and (b) Qi=318 m3 s−1.
Distribution of the concentration of brine in the outlet cross section for (a) Qi = 41 m3 s−1 and (b) Qi=318 m3 s−1.

Input data and results_

No.QiAiuxiqduzdCdCavgCmax

m3 s−1m2m s−1m3 s−1m s−1kg m−3kg m−3kg m−3
14163.580.6450.2820.0007400.27290.341
25175.250.6780.4250.0010400.33060.341
377.2106.110.7280.7670.0018400.39330.497
4113139.070.8131.4670.0035400.51250.632
5169173.750.9732.0000.0047400.46780.560
6318246.771.2892.0000.0047400.25000.340

The results of the maximum concentration value and the component values of velocity vector ux_

DistanceCase(i)(ii)(iii)Error (ii) - (i), %Error (iii) - (ii), %
X = 250 mCs (kg m−3)0.9910.9990.9970.80−0.14
X = 250 mux (m s−1)0.9991.0001.0000.12−0.13
X = 500 mCs (kg m−3)2.0222.1402.1735.521.52
X = 500 mux (m s−1)1.4421.4481.4370.43−0.71

Measured values of the brine concentration at selected depths in the Odra River upstream and downstream the discharge_

LocationSalinity of the Odra River at selected depths

kg m−3kg m−3kg m−3kg m−3

mmmm
80 m upstream the discharge0.1880.1880.1810.185
2.21.50.60.0
420 m downstream the dischargeLeft riverbank0.6140.5940.5940.565
2.52.00.60.0
Middle of the river's current0.5490.5660.5650.565
2.51.50.50.0
Right riverbank0.2660.2460.2630.257
1.51.00.50.0

Brine propagation simulation results (Cs) compared with the measurements of chloride content (Cm) at the end of the model section_

Left riverbankMiddle of the river's currentRight riverbank

hCsCmΔHCsCmΔhCsCmΔ

mkg m−3kg m−3kg m−3mkg m−3kg m−3kg m−3mkg m−3kg m−3kg m−3
0.00.4000.3800.0200.00.2870.380−0.0930.00.2180.0720.146
0.50.4010.413−0.0120.50.2870.384−0.0970.50.2190.0820.137
1.50.4070.4060.0011.50.2900.379−0.0891.00.2200.0590.161
2.50.4100.426−0.0162.50.2920.361−0.0691.50.2240.0780.146
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 366 - 379
Submitted on: Oct 23, 2021
|
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2021
|
Published on: Dec 22, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Szymon Zieliński, Stanisław Kostecki, Paweł Stefanek, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.