Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded strip footing on spatially variable cohesive soil Cover

Bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded strip footing on spatially variable cohesive soil

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

FE model scheme.
FE model scheme.

Figure 2

Reaction in displaced nodes (as a function of displacement) obtained in deterministic calculations. Maximum values (bearing capacities) are marked on the vertical axis.
Reaction in displaced nodes (as a function of displacement) obtained in deterministic calculations. Maximum values (bearing capacities) are marked on the vertical axis.

Figure 3

Distribution of vertical displacement in elements adjacent to the strip foundation.
Distribution of vertical displacement in elements adjacent to the strip foundation.

Figure 4

Exemplary realisation of random field modelling cohesion for θv = 1 m and θh = 10 m
Exemplary realisation of random field modelling cohesion for θv = 1 m and θh = 10 m

Figure 5

Cumulated equivalent plastic strain obtained for realisation of cohesion random field presented in Fig. 4 for a) e = 0.0 m, b) e = 0.5 m
Cumulated equivalent plastic strain obtained for realisation of cohesion random field presented in Fig. 4 for a) e = 0.0 m, b) e = 0.5 m

Figure 6

Estimated normal distributions of the bearing capacity obtained for θv = 1 m and θh = 10 m for different values of eccentricity e.
Estimated normal distributions of the bearing capacity obtained for θv = 1 m and θh = 10 m for different values of eccentricity e.

Figure 7

Influence of horizontal SOF θh on the mean value μQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.
Influence of horizontal SOF θh on the mean value μQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.

Figure 8

Influence of horizontal SOF θh on SD σQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.
Influence of horizontal SOF θh on SD σQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.

Figure 9

Influence of horizontal SOF θh on CoV δQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.
Influence of horizontal SOF θh on CoV δQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.

Figure 10

Influence of eccentricity e on SD σQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.
Influence of eccentricity e on SD σQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.

Figure 11

Influence of eccentricity e on CoV δQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.
Influence of eccentricity e on CoV δQ for a) θv = 0.5 m and b) θv = 1.0 m.

Comparison of semi-analytical and numerical values of bearing capacity_

Eccentricity e (m)00.1 m0.2 m0.3 m0.4 m0.5 m
QFEM (kN/m)217.28197.43176.81156.12135.44114.68
B* = 2.000 mQan (kN/m)205.66185.10164.53143.96123.40102.83
Relative difference (%)5.656.667.468.459.7611.52
B* = 2.113 mQan (kN/m)217.28196.72176.15155.58135.02114.45
Relative difference (%)0.000.360.380.340.310.20

Assumed model parameters_

ElasticityMohr–Coulomb plasticity

Young's modulus, EPoisson's ratio, νCohesion mean value, μcCohesion standard deviation, σcInternal friction angle, ϕDilation, angle, ψ
Soil200 MPa0.3320 kPa2 kPa
Footing32 GPa0.00

The values of β and pf calculated (based on Table 3) for θv = 1 m θh = 10 m and Q = 159_95 kN/m_

Eccentricity e (m)

0.000.010.020.100.200.300.40.5
β (−)3.803.693.572.661.19−0.53−2.62−5.27
pf (−)7.2×10−51.1×10−41.8×10−43.9×10−31.2×10−17.0×10−1≈1.0≈1.0

Obtained and interpolated values of μQ and δQ_

θv (m)θh (m)μQQEccentricity e (m)

0.000.01*0.02*0.100.200.300.40.5
0.52.0μ Q(kN/m)210.19--194.21173.95153.71133.45113.14
δQ (%)3.65--4.084.334.634.995.42
5.0μ Q(kN/m)210.13--193.88173.78153.66133.52113.29
δQ(%)4.70--5.245.515.816.176.60
10.0μQ (kN/m)210.24--193.95173.79153.64133.44113.18
δQ (%)5.27--5.695.936.206.486.80
30.0μQ (kN/m)211.68--194.51174.27154.02133.72113.33
δQ (%)5.37--5.675.906.166.476.85
1.02.0μQ (kN/m)209.72--194.14173.97153.81133.59113.31
δQ (%)4.51--5.075.345.635.966.31
5.0μQ (kN/m)209.70--194.03173.92153.78133.60113.33
δQ (%)5.77--6.136.386.656.957.25
10.0μQ (kN/m)209.88208.32206.75194.25174.18154.07133.89113.60
δQ (%)6.266.306.346.646.887.147.427.74
30.0μQ (kN/m)211.35--194.66174.53154.38134.19113.90
δQ (%)6.60--6.867.067.277.527.79
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 425 - 437
Submitted on: Nov 4, 2021
Accepted on: Nov 15, 2021
Published on: Dec 16, 2021
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Jędrzej Dobrzański, Marek Kawa, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.