Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Safety analysis of the Żelazny Most tailings pond: qualitative evaluation of the preventive measures effectiveness

Open Access
|Jun 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

TSF Żelazny Most.
TSF Żelazny Most.

Figure 2

Loading berms on the northern dam.
Loading berms on the northern dam.

Figure 3

Locations of relief wells in the considered area.
Locations of relief wells in the considered area.

Figure 4

Technological sections (red) and cross-sections (green) selected for analysis.
Technological sections (red) and cross-sections (green) selected for analysis.

Figure 5

Geotechnical cross-sections along the boreholes located in a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.
Geotechnical cross-sections along the boreholes located in a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.

Figure 6

Numerical models of the dam with the substrate: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.
Numerical models of the dam with the substrate: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.

Figure 7

Geometry of the FE model in the VaN cross-section for individual stages of the dam raise, corresponding to the crest elevation [m a.s.l.]: a) 140.0, b) 150.0, c) 160.0, d) 173.5, e) 180.0, f) 189.0, g) 195.0.
Geometry of the FE model in the VaN cross-section for individual stages of the dam raise, corresponding to the crest elevation [m a.s.l.]: a) 140.0, b) 150.0, c) 160.0, d) 173.5, e) 180.0, f) 189.0, g) 195.0.

Figure 8

Exemplary calibration results: a) benchmark, b) piezometer, and c) inclinometer.
Exemplary calibration results: a) benchmark, b) piezometer, and c) inclinometer.

Figure 9

Horizontal displacement (ux [mm]) as a function of dam elevation: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.
Horizontal displacement (ux [mm]) as a function of dam elevation: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.

Figure 10

Vertical displacement (uy [mm]) as a function of dam elevation: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.
Vertical displacement (uy [mm]) as a function of dam elevation: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.

Figure 11

Potential failure mechanism for a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.
Potential failure mechanism for a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.

Figure 12

Evolution of FOS with the increase of the dam height: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.
Evolution of FOS with the increase of the dam height: a) cross-section VIIIN and b) cross-section VaN.

Technical parameters of TSF Żelazny Most (last update in September 2020)_

ParameterValueUnit
The volume according to the damming curve660.0mln m3
Water volume8mln m3
Tailings volume652mln m3
Pond water elevation184.50m a.s.l.
The crest elevation187.50/190.00m a.s.l.
The area of the TSF Żelazny Most (Main Object) with infrastructure~1580ha
The area on the inner side of the crest1180ha
The reservoir area560ha
Beach area620ha
The dam length in axis14,330m
The height of the dams40.0–73.0m

Factors of safety for analyzed variants_

FOS

Dam elevationCaseVIIINVaN
180 m a.s.l.Reference case (without any preventive measures)1.591.67
Loading berm1.591.66
Relief wells1.631.83
Both relief wells and loading berm1.631.83
195 m a.s.l.Reference case (without any preventive measures)1.351.29
Loading berm1.661.58
Relief wells1.381.39
Both relief wells and loading berm1.621.59

Summary of the preventive measures effectiveness with regard to safety of the dam_

Evaluated featureCaseCross-section

VIIINVaN
Horizontal displacements rateLoading berm
Relief wells
Both
Vertical displacements rateLoading berm
Relief wells
Both
Factor of safety (FOS)Loading berm
Relief wells
Both

Geotechnical parameters of the layers used in the calculations_

ParameterγdγsatϕcψEν

Unit[kN/m3][kN/m3][°][kPa][°][MPa][-]
Loading berm21.0022.0035110800.20
Dam (1)19.0020.503419800.20
Dam (2)19.0020.503419800.20
Beach (3)18.0019.503419800.20
Sediments (4)17.0018.503419800.20
Layer 7n16.0620.001811.8960.25
Layer 8n16.0620.001211.21000.30
Layer 9n17.3020.5014.551.5360.25
Layer 10n16.8020.001011.0360.25
Layer 12n16.8020.002712.7960.25
Layer 13n17.6721.002822.8960.25
Layer 15n17.9721.302432.4960.25
Layer 16n16.8720.5036111.02400.20
Layer 17n16.0620.003116.02400.20
Layer 18n15.8619.803015.02400.20
Layer 19n16.8020.002412.4960.25
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 181 - 194
Submitted on: May 7, 2021
Accepted on: May 11, 2021
Published on: Jun 30, 2021
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Dariusz Łydżba, Adrian Różański, Maciej Sobótka, Michał Pachnicz, Szczepan Grosel, Matylda Tankiewicz, Paweł Stefanek, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.