Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of Waste Toothbrush Fiber on Strength and Freezing–Thawing Behavior in High Plasticity Clay Cover

Influence of Waste Toothbrush Fiber on Strength and Freezing–Thawing Behavior in High Plasticity Clay

Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Toothbrush bristles (a) after cutting, (b) after mixing with dry soil, (c) after adding optimum water content.
Toothbrush bristles (a) after cutting, (b) after mixing with dry soil, (c) after adding optimum water content.

Figure 2

Closed system full automatic freezing–thawing test cabinet.
Closed system full automatic freezing–thawing test cabinet.

Figure 3

Stress–strain curves of samples at (a) 0 cycle, (b) 3 cycles, (c) 6 cycles, (d) 9 cycles, (e)12 cycles.
Stress–strain curves of samples at (a) 0 cycle, (b) 3 cycles, (c) 6 cycles, (d) 9 cycles, (e)12 cycles.

Figure 4

Unconfined compression test: (a) unreinforced sample (9 cycles), (b) reinforced sample (toothbrush bristles 0.8% ratio, 9 cycles).
Unconfined compression test: (a) unreinforced sample (9 cycles), (b) reinforced sample (toothbrush bristles 0.8% ratio, 9 cycles).

Figure 5

Waste toothbrush bristle ratio vs. undrained shear strength.
Waste toothbrush bristle ratio vs. undrained shear strength.

Figure 6

Relationship between (a) the peak UCS ratio, (b) the ultimate UCS ratio and freezing–thawing cycles.
Relationship between (a) the peak UCS ratio, (b) the ultimate UCS ratio and freezing–thawing cycles.

Figure 7

Relationship between FTML and freezing–thawing cycles.
Relationship between FTML and freezing–thawing cycles.

Prepared samples, WTB ratios and number of freezing–thawing cycles_

Sample DescriptionWTB Ratio (%)Number of Cycles
Unreinforced0.00–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-10.20–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-20.40–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-30.60–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-40.80–3–6–9–12

Some properties of clayey soil used in tests_

PropertiesValue
Liquid limit1, wL (%)57.8
Plastic limit2, wP (%)24.4
Plasticity index, IP (%)33.4
Optimum water content3, wopt (%)23.6
Maximum dry unit weight3, γdmax (kN/m3)15.3
Soil class (USCS)CH
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2020-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 21
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 15, 2020
Published on: Oct 23, 2020
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Fatih Isik, R. Kagan Akbulut, A. Sahin Zaimoglu, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.