Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of the soil constitutive models on the seismic analysis of pile-supported wharf structures with batter piles in cut-slope rock dike Cover

The influence of the soil constitutive models on the seismic analysis of pile-supported wharf structures with batter piles in cut-slope rock dike

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Finite element model of the wharf.

Figure 2

Stiffness parameters of standard drained triaxial test results: (1) for the MC model, (2) for the HS model, (3) for the HSS model [66]

Table 1

Soil parameters used for the MC model.

ParametersUnitDense sandLoose sandRockfill
φ°3733.245
ψ°2170
CkN/m20.50.515
ν-0.30.30.2
EkN/m26.032 × 1041.638 × 1042.232 × 104
Table 2

Soil parameters used for HS model

ParametersUnitDense sandLoose sandRockfill
E50refkN/m26.032 × 1041.638 × 1042.232 × 104
EoedrefkN/m24.826 × 1041.310 × 1041.786 × 104
EurrefkN/m21.810 × 1044.914 × 1046.696 × 104
PrefkN/m2100100100
M-0.50.50.5
K0nc-0.39820.45240.2929
Rf-0.90.90.9
Figure 3

Characteristic stiffness-strain behavior in logarithmic scale (after Atkinson and Sallfors [36] and Mair[76]) (Atkinson, 2000)[77].

Table 3

Additional input parameters of HSS model.

ParametersUnitDense sandLoose sandRockӿll
γ0.7-4.918 × 10–43.629 × 10–44.246 × 10–4
G0refkN/m21.051 × 1059.108 × 1041.038 × 105
Figure 4

Calibration of soil parameters of MC model in numerical soil element tests for rockfill, dense sand and loose sand.

Table 4

Pile and deck properties.

ParametersUnitPileDeck
EAkN/m162.75 × 10417.85 × 106
EIkN.m2/m70.49 × 10396.724 × 103
wkN/m/m0.6336.9436
ν-0.20.2
Figure 5

Unscaled input accelerogram from 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.

Figure 6

Total displacements with MC model.

Figure 7

Total displacements with HS model.

Figure 8

Total displacements with HSS model.

Figure 9

Nodal displacement vectors for the wharf supported piles (m)[28].

Figure 10

Pore pressure of the numerical model

Figure 11

Total pore pressure contours (Pa)[28].

Figure 12

Total displacements of the piles.

Table 5

Lateral and vertical displacement time histories at the top and at the toe of the rock dike.

ModelLateral and vertical displacements at the rock dike topLateral and vertical displacements at the rock dike toe
MCgraphic/j_sgem-2019-0050_fig_013.jpggraphic/j_sgem-2019-0050_fig_014.jpg
HSgraphic/j_sgem-2019-0050_fig_015.jpggraphic/j_sgem-2019-0050_fig_016.jpg
HSSgraphic/j_sgem-2019-0050_fig_017.jpggraphic/j_sgem-2019-0050_fig_018.jpg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0050 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X (formerly 0137-124X) | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 191 - 209
Submitted on: Jun 21, 2019
Accepted on: May 7, 2020
Published on: Jul 5, 2020
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Lylia Deghoul, Smail Gabi, Adam Hamrouni, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.