Supervised probabilistic failure prediction of tuned mass damper-equipped high steel frames using machine learning methods

Farrokhi, Farshid; Rahimi, Sepideh

doi:10.2478/sgem-2019-0043

Abstract

In this study, firstly, the behavior of a high steel frame equipped with tuned mass damper (TMD) due to several seismic records is investigated considering the structural and seismic uncertainties. Then, machine learning methods including artificial neural networks (ANN), decision tree (DT), Naïve Bayes (NB) and support vector machines (SVM) are used to predict the behavior of the structure. Results showed that among the machine learning models, SVM with Gaussian kernel has better performance since it is capable of predicting the drift of stories and the failure probability with R² value equal to 0.99. Furthermore, results of feature selection algorithms revealed that when using TMD in high steel structures, seismic uncertainties have greater influences on drift of stories in comparison with structural uncertainties. Findings of this study can be used in design and probabilistic analysis of high steel frames equipped with TMDs.

References

Ahmad, M. F., Haydar, S., Bhatti, A. A., Bari, A. J. (2014). Application of artificial neural network for the prediction of biosorption capacity of immobilized Bacillus subtilis for the removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solution. Biochemical engineering journal, 84, 83–90.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Asefpour Vakilian, K., Massah, J. (2018). A portable nitrate biosensing device using electrochemistry and spectroscopy. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(8), 3080–3089.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Basak, D., Pal, S., Patranabis, D. C. (2007). Support vector regression. Neural Information Processing-Letters and Reviews, 11(10), 203–224.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S. M. (2011). Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search. Engineering Structures, 33(9), 2716–2723.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chey, M. H., Chase, J. G., Mander, J. B., Carr, A. J. (2010). Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: Application. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39(1), 69–89.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cramér H. (2016). Mathematical Methods of Statistics, vol. 9. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Debbarma R., Debnath D. (2013). Earthquake Response Control of 3-Story Building Structures by Tuned Mass Damper. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 2, 187–192.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deierlein, G. G., Reinhorn, A. M., Willford, M. R. (2010). Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design. NEHRP seismic design technical brief, 4, 1–36.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Farrokhi, F., Rahimi, S. (2017). Probabilistic failure analysis of high steel frames with tuned mass damper. In XI Conference on Steel and Composite Construction, Coimbra, Portugal, 23 and 24 November, 2017, 507–514.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giaralis, A., Taflanidis, A. A. (2018). Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(2), e2082.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of machine learning research, 3, 1157–1182.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hashemi, A., Asefpour Vakilian, K., Khazaei, J., Massah, J. (2014). An artificial neural network modeling for force control system of a robotic pruning machine. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 38(1), 35–41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huang, J., Cai, Y., Xu, X. (2007). A hybrid genetic algorithm for feature selection wrapper based on mutual information. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(13), 1825–1844.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kappos, A. J., Papanikolaou, V. K. (2016). Nonlinear dynamic analysis of masonry buildings and definition of seismic damage states. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 10(1), 192–209.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krishnan, S. (2007). Case studies of damage to 19-storey irregular steel moment-frame buildings under near-source ground motion. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 36(7), 861–885.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, H., Huo, L. (2010). Advances in structural control in civil engineering in China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lin, S. W., Lee, Z. J., Chen, S. C., Tseng, T. Y. (2008). Parameter determination of support vector machine and feature selection using simulated annealing approach. Applied soft computing, 8(4), 1505–1512.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, H., Li, J., Wong, L. (2002). A comparative study on feature selection and classification methods using gene expression profiles and proteomic patterns. Genome informatics, 13, 51–60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, H., Liu, L., Zhang, H. (2009). Boosting feature selection using information metric for classification. Neurocomputing, 73(1), 295–303.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marano, G. C., Greco, R., Chiaia, B. (2010). A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329(23), 4880–4890.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Massah, J., Asefpour Vakilian, K. (2019). An intelligent portable biosensor for fast and accurate nitrate determination using cyclic voltammetry. Biosystems Engineering, 177, 49–58.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J. G., Mitchell, T. M. (2013). Machine Learning, An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mohebbi, M., Shakeri, K., Ghanbarpour, Y., Majzoub, H. (2013). Designing optimal multiple tuned mass dampers using genetic algorithms (GAs) for mitigating the seismic response of structures. Journal of Vibration and Control, 19(4), 605–625.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moustakidis, S. P., Theocharis, J. B. (2010). SVM-FuzCoC: A novel SVM-based feature selection method using a fuzzy complementary criterion. Pattern Recognition, 43(11), 3712–3729.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Muto, M., Krishnan, S. (2011). Hope for the best, prepare for the worst: Response of tall steel buildings to the shakeout scenario earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 27(2), 375–398.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pozos-Estrada, A., Hong, H. P. (2015). Sensitivity Analysis of the Effectiveness of Tuned Mass Dampers to Reduce the Wind-Induced Torsional Responses. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 12(13), 2520–2538.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A. W., Chung, R. M. (1997). A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26(6), 617–635.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soto, M. G., Adeli, H. (2013). Tuned mass dampers. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 20(4), 419–431.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sun, X., Liu, Y., Li, J., Zhu, J., Chen, H., Liu, X. (2012). Feature evaluation and selection with cooperative game theory. Pattern recognition, 45(8), 2992–3002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vickery, B. J., Galsworthy, J. K., Gerges, R. (2001). The behaviour of simple non-linear tuned mass dampers. In 6th World Congress of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Melbourne, Australia.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, L., Shi, W., Zhou, Y. (2019). Study on self-adjustable variable pendulum tuned mass damper. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28(1), e1561.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Supervised probabilistic failure prediction of tuned mass damper-equipped high steel frames using machine learning methods

Abstract

Paradigm

My account