Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An influence of track stiffness discontinuity on pantograph base vibrations and catenary–pantograph dynamic interaction Cover

An influence of track stiffness discontinuity on pantograph base vibrations and catenary–pantograph dynamic interaction

By: Danuta Bryja and  Adam Hyliński  
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Zhai, W., Wang, K., Cai, C. (2009). Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Vehicle System Dynamics, 47(11), 1349–1376.
  2. Galvín, P., Romero, A., Domínguez, J. (2010). Vibrations induced by HST passage on ballast and non-ballast tracks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30, 862–873.
  3. Yang, X., Gu, S., Zhou, S., Yang, J., Zhou, Y., Lian, S. (2015). Effect of track irregularity on the dynamic response of a slab track under a high-speed train based on the composite track element method. Applied Acoustics, 99, 72–84.
  4. Cho, Y. H. (2008). Numerical simulation of the dynamic responses of railway overhead contact lines to a moving pantograph, considering a nonlinear dropper. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 315, 433–454.
  5. Cho, Y. H., Lee, K., Park Y., Kang, B., Kim, K. (2010). Influence of contact wire pre- sag on the dynamics of pantograph–railway catenary. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 52, 1471–1490.
  6. Massat, J-P., Laurent, C., Bianchi, J-P., Balmès, E. (2014). Pantograph catenary dynamic optimisation based on advanced multibody and finite element co-simulation tools. Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(Supplement), 338–354.
  7. Ambrósio, J., Pombo, J., Pereira, M., Antunes, P. and Mósca, A. (2012). Recent developments in pantograph-catenary interaction modelling and analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1(1), 249–278.
  8. Ambrósio, J., Pombo, J., Pereira, M., Antunes, P., Mósca, A. (2012). A computational procedure for the dynamic analysis of the catenary-pantograph interaction in high-speed trains. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 50(3), 681–699.
  9. Pombo, J., Antunes, P., Ambrósio, J. (2012). A study on multiple pantograph operations for high-speed catenary contact. In B. H. V. Topping (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology (paper 139). Stirlingshire, Scotland: Civil-Comp Press.
  10. Poetsch G., Evans J., Meisinger R., Kortüm W., Baldauf W., Veitl A., Wallaschek J. (1997). Pantograph/catenary dynamics and control. Vehicle System Dynamics, 28, 159–195.
  11. Pombo, J., Ambrosio, J. (2013). Environmental and track perturbations on multiple pantograph interaction with catenaries in high-speed trains. Computers and Structures, 124, 88–101.
  12. Bryja, D., Popiołek (Hyliński), A. (2017). Analiza drgań wieszara cięgnowego jako modelu kolejowej sieci trakcyjnej obciążonej ruchem pantografów. Journal of Civil Engineering, Environment and Architecture, 34(2), 177–190.
  13. Bryja, D., Prokopowicz, D. (2016). Dyskretno-ciągły model obliczeniowy sprzężonego układu dynamicznego: pantograf - napowietrzna sieć trakcyjna. Przegląd Komunikacyjny. 71(5), 44–51.
  14. Bryja, D., Hyliński, A. (2019). Droppers’ stiffness influence on dynamic interaction between the pantograph and railway catenary. Railway Reports, 63(183), 89–98.
  15. Bryja, D., Popiołek (Hyliński), A. (2018). Numeryczna symulacja drgań sieci trakcyjnych na liniach KDP, z uwzględnieniem nieliniowej pracy linek wieszakowych. In P. Kozioł, A. Szarata & W. Drozd (Eds.), Inżynieria kolejowa - szanse i wyzwania (pp. 55–76). Kraków, Poland: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej.
  16. CENELEC. (2002). EN 50318:2002 Railway applications – Current collection systems –Validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. Brussels: Central Secretariat of European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization.
  17. Bryja, D., Gisterek, I., Popiołek (Hyliński), A. (2015). Analiza numeryczna wpływu nierówności progowej na drgania toru kolejowego spowodowane przejazdem pociągu dużych prędkości. Inżynieria i Budownictwo, 71(10), 532–536.
  18. Bryja, D. Popiołek (Hyliński), A. (2015). Analiza drgań pojazdów kolejowych w trakcie ich przejazdu przez nierówność progową toru. Przegląd Komunikacyjny, 70(9), 68–72.
  19. Bryja, D., Popiołek (Hyliński), A. (2018). Drgania sieci trakcyjnej spowodowane przejazdem pociągu dużych prędkości przez nierówność progową toru kolejowego. Przegląd komunikacyjny, 73(6), 7–12.
  20. Benra, F. K., Dohmen, H. J., Pei, J., Schuster, S., & Wan, B. (2011). A comparison of one-way and two-way coupling methods for numerical analysis of fluid-structure interactions. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2011, doi:10.1155/2011/853560.
  21. Esveld, C. (2014). Modern Railway Track. Zaltbommel: MRT-Productions.
  22. Bryja, D., Gisterek, I., Popiołek (Hyliński), A. (2015). A computational method for acceleration analysis of a railway track with a stiffness discontinuity. In J. Kruis, Y. Tsompanakis & B.H.V. Topping (Eds.), Proc. of the Fifteenth Int. Conf. on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Prague - Czech Republic, 1–4 September 2015, (pp. 1–13). Stirlingshire, Scotland: Civil-Comp Press.
  23. Bryja, D., Hołubowski, R., Gisterek, I. (2014). Railroad vehicle modelling in probabilistic vibration analysis of a railway bridge with randomly fluctuating track ballast stiffness. In A. Cunha et al (Eds.), Proc. of the Ninth European Conference on Structural Dynamics EURODYN 2014, Porto - Portugal, 30 June – 2 July, (pp. 2737–2744). Porto: Clássica, Artes Gráficas.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 124
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2019
|
Accepted on: Nov 3, 2019
|
Published on: Jun 30, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Danuta Bryja, Adam Hyliński, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.