Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining System Cover

Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining System

By: Anu James and  Babu Kurian  
Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2012). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington DC.
  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2016). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington DC.
  3. Bakhoum, M.M., Mourad, S.A. & Hassan, M.M. (2016). Comparison of actions and resistances in different building design codes. J. Adv. Res. 7(5), 757–767. 10.1016/j.jare.2015.11.001.
  4. British Standards Institution. (2000). British standard: Execution of special geotechnical works - Diaphragm walls. BS EN 1538:2000. London.
  5. British Standards Institution. (2004). UK National Annex to Eurocode 7 Geotechnical design, General rules. BS NA EN 1997-1:2004. London.
  6. British Standards Institution. (2015). British standard: Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BS 8002:2015. London.
  7. British Standards Institution. (2015). British standard: Code of practice for foundations. BS 8004:2015. London.
  8. Brown, D., Wulleman, T. & Bottiau, M. (2016). A comparison of design practice of bored piles/drilled shafts between Europe and North America. The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute. 10(2), 54-63. 10.1080/19375247.2016.1254375
  9. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1980). Indian standard: Code of practice for design and construction of diaphragm walls. IS 9556:1980(R2003). New Delhi.
  10. Bureau of Indian Standards. (1989). Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-Part 2 Earth Pressures. IS 4651 (Part 2):1989. New Delhi.
  11. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2014). Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-General design considerations. IS 4651 (Part 4). New Delhi.
  12. Canadian Geotechnical Society. (2006). Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 4th edition. Canada.
  13. Canadian Standards Association. (2006). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-06. Ontario.
  14. Canadian Standards Association. (2014). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-14. Ontario.
  15. European committee for standardization. (2004). European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 1: General rules. EN 1997-1:2004. Brussels.
  16. European committee for standardization. (2004). European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. EN 1997-2:2004. Brussels.
  17. Fellenius, B.H. (2014). Piled foundation design as reflected in codes and standards. Proceedings of the DFI-EFFC International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, 21-23 May 2014 ( pp 1013-1030). Stockholm.
  18. Fenton, G.A., Naghibi, F., Dundas, D., Bathurst, R.J.& Griffiths, D.V. (2016) Reliability-Based Geotechnical Design in the 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Can. Geotech. J. 53(2), 236-251. 10.1139/cgj-2015-0158.
  19. Khabbaz, H. & Aung, Y. (2015). Anchored wall design: comparing the global and partial factors of safety incorporating the Australian standards. International Journal of Geomate 9(1), 1395-1402. 10.21660/2015.17.4291.
  20. Lewandowska, A.S. & Czajewska, M.M. (2007). Design of diaphragm walls according to EN 1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2007 (pp_291-296). Madrid: IOS Press.
  21. Simpson, B. (2000). Partial factors: where to apply them? International Workshop on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering, 18 November 2000. Melbourne.
  22. Standards Australia. (2002). Australian standard: Earth Retaining Structures. AS 4678-2002. Sydney.
  23. Standards Australia. (2002). Structural design actions-permanent, imposed and other actions. AS/NZS 1170-1-2002. Sydney.
  24. Standards Australia. (2004). Australian standard: Bridge design Part 3 Foundations and soil-supporting structures. AS 5100-3-2004. Sydney.
  25. Tabsh, S.W. (2013). Comparison between reinforced concrete designs based on the ACI 318 and BS 8110 codes. Structural Engineering & Mechanics. 48(4), 467-477. 10.12989/sem.2013.48.4.467.
  26. Wijaya, J. & Taiebat, H. (2009). Factor of safety in AS-4678: Earth retaining structures. Australian Geomechanics Journal. 44 (4), 27-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2018-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2083-831X | Journal ISSN: 0137-6365
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 29
Submitted on: Dec 9, 2017
|
Accepted on: Mar 23, 2018
|
Published on: Jun 4, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Anu James, Babu Kurian, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.