Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining System

James, Anu; Kurian, Babu

doi:10.2478/sgem-2018-0004

Abstract

Diaphragm walls are deep embedded earth retaining structures. They also act as a part of the foundation. Geotechnical codes of practice from various countries provide procedures for the analysis of deep foundations. Not many standards are available that directly regulate the analysis of diaphragm walls. This paper compares the analysis of diaphragm walls performed using the foundation codes of different countries. Codes including EN 1997-1, BS 8002, BS 8004, BS EN 1538, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, AS 4678, AS 5100.3, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, CAN/CSA S6, IS 9556 and IS 4651 are chosen for the study. Numerical studies and calculations are done using the finite element software Plaxis 2d. Comparative study is performed based on the values of displacements and the forces developed. Study also evaluates the effect of differences in partial safety factors. The outcome of research emphasises the need for development of comprehensive analysis procedures.

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2012). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington DC.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2016). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington DC.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bakhoum, M.M., Mourad, S.A. & Hassan, M.M. (2016). Comparison of actions and resistances in different building design codes. J. Adv. Res. 7(5), 757–767. 10.1016/j.jare.2015.11.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
British Standards Institution. (2000). British standard: Execution of special geotechnical works - Diaphragm walls. BS EN 1538:2000. London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
British Standards Institution. (2004). UK National Annex to Eurocode 7 Geotechnical design, General rules. BS NA EN 1997-1:2004. London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
British Standards Institution. (2015). British standard: Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BS 8002:2015. London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
British Standards Institution. (2015). British standard: Code of practice for foundations. BS 8004:2015. London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, D., Wulleman, T. & Bottiau, M. (2016). A comparison of design practice of bored piles/drilled shafts between Europe and North America. The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute. 10(2), 54-63. 10.1080/19375247.2016.1254375
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bureau of Indian Standards. (1980). Indian standard: Code of practice for design and construction of diaphragm walls. IS 9556:1980(R2003). New Delhi.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bureau of Indian Standards. (1989). Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-Part 2 Earth Pressures. IS 4651 (Part 2):1989. New Delhi.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2014). Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-General design considerations. IS 4651 (Part 4). New Delhi.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Canadian Geotechnical Society. (2006). Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 4th edition. Canada.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Canadian Standards Association. (2006). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-06. Ontario.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Canadian Standards Association. (2014). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-14. Ontario.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European committee for standardization. (2004). European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 1: General rules. EN 1997-1:2004. Brussels.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European committee for standardization. (2004). European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. EN 1997-2:2004. Brussels.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fellenius, B.H. (2014). Piled foundation design as reflected in codes and standards. Proceedings of the DFI-EFFC International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, 21-23 May 2014 ( pp 1013-1030). Stockholm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fenton, G.A., Naghibi, F., Dundas, D., Bathurst, R.J.& Griffiths, D.V. (2016) Reliability-Based Geotechnical Design in the 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Can. Geotech. J. 53(2), 236-251. 10.1139/cgj-2015-0158.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Khabbaz, H. & Aung, Y. (2015). Anchored wall design: comparing the global and partial factors of safety incorporating the Australian standards. International Journal of Geomate 9(1), 1395-1402. 10.21660/2015.17.4291.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewandowska, A.S. & Czajewska, M.M. (2007). Design of diaphragm walls according to EN 1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2007 (pp_291-296). Madrid: IOS Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simpson, B. (2000). Partial factors: where to apply them? International Workshop on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering, 18 November 2000. Melbourne.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Standards Australia. (2002). Australian standard: Earth Retaining Structures. AS 4678-2002. Sydney.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Standards Australia. (2002). Structural design actions-permanent, imposed and other actions. AS/NZS 1170-1-2002. Sydney.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Standards Australia. (2004). Australian standard: Bridge design Part 3 Foundations and soil-supporting structures. AS 5100-3-2004. Sydney.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tabsh, S.W. (2013). Comparison between reinforced concrete designs based on the ACI 318 and BS 8110 codes. Structural Engineering & Mechanics. 48(4), 467-477. 10.12989/sem.2013.48.4.467.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wijaya, J. & Taiebat, H. (2009). Factor of safety in AS-4678: Earth retaining structures. Australian Geomechanics Journal. 44 (4), 27-31.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining System

Abstract

Paradigm

My account