References
- Al Alo v. Slovakia, 32084/19 (ECtHR February 10, 2022). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-215746
- Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom, 26766/05 and 22228/06 (ECHR [GC] December 15, 2011). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108072
- Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (U.S. Supreme Court June 23, 2011).
- Butkevich v. Russia, 5865/07 (ECtHR February 13, 2018). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180832
- Chernika v. Ukraine, 53791/11 (ECtHR March 12, 2020). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201641
- Code of Criminal Procedure of Slovakia. (2005, May 24). Law. Slovakia. Retrieved from https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/svk/2005/code_of_criminal_procedure_html/Code_of_Criminal_Procedure_of_Slovakia_English.pdf
- Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. European Convention on Human Rights, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15.
- Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (US Supreme Court 2004).
- Criminal Procedure Law. (2010, November 18). Official gazette No. 150.
- Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (U.S. Supreme Court June 16, 2006).
- European Commission. (2024). North Macedonia 2024 Report. Brussels: European Commission. doi:https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/north-macedonia-report-2024_en
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (2024).
- Federal Rules of Evidence. (2024).
- Federal Rules of Evidence Advisory Committee. (1974 Enactment). Notes.
- G. Kalajdžiev, G. Lažetić Bužarovska. (2013). Acceleration of proceedings – one of the aims of criminal procedure reform in the Republic of Macedonia. In I. J. Stanisavljević, & I. J. Stanisavljević (Ed.), Simplified Forms of Procedure in Criminal Matters: regional criminal procedure legislation and experiences in application (pp. 108-123). Belgrade: OSCEMissiontoSerbia. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/3/d/103129.pdf
- G. Lažetic, G. Kalajdziev, B. Misoski, D. Ilić Dimoski. (2020). The Pre-Trial Procedure in Republic of North Macedonia. In R. E. Edward Johnston (Ed.), A comparative analysis of pre-trial procedure in Europe: the search for an ideal model (pp. 133-156). Istanbul: Istanbul University Press. doi:10.26650/B/SS26.2020.014.07
- Giles v. California, 554 U.S. 353 (U.S. Supreme Court June 25, 2008).
- Hammon v. Indiana, 547 U.S. 813 (U.S. Supreme Court June 19, 2006).
- Keskin v. The Netherlands, 2205/16 (ECtHR January 19, 2021). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207365
- Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (U.S. Supreme Court June 25, 2009).
- Mirilashvili v. Russia, 6293/04 (ECtHR December 11, 2008). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90099
- Paić v. Croatia, 47082/12 (ECHR March 29, 2016). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-161752
- Papdakis v. FYROM, 50254/07 (ECtHR February 26, 2013). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116827
- Pichugin v. Russia, 38623/03 (ECtHR October 23, 2012). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-114074
- Satlanis, C. (2022). The free objective evaluation of the evidence in European criminal law. In Yearbook of International & European Criminal and Procedural Law (Vol. 1, pp. 342-404). CEIJ. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10576939
- Schatschaschwili v. Germany, 9154/10 (ECHR [GC] December 15, 2015). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159566
- Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (U.S. Supreme Court June 21, 2023).
- Thomas v. the United Kingdom, 19354/02 (ECtHR May 10, 2005).
- United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171 (US Supreme Court June 23, 1975).
- US Constitution. (n.d.).