Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Antisymmetry, Morphological Merger, and Chinese Resultative Compounding Cover

Antisymmetry, Morphological Merger, and Chinese Resultative Compounding

By: Xuhui Hu  
Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2016. The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Baker, Mark C. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 169–225.
  4. Borer, Hagit. 2005a. Structuring sense, volume 1, In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Borer, Hagit. 2005b. Structuring sense, volume 2, The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring sense, volume 3, Taking forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1997. Resultative compounds and lexical relational structures. In Feng-fu Tsao & H. Samuel Wang (eds.), Chinese languages and linguistics III: Morphology and lexicon. 167–197.
  8. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  9. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49.
  13. Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595.
  15. Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2020. A head movement approach to Talmy’s Typology. Linguistic Inquiry 51(3). 425–470.
  16. Hale, Ken & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  17. Hale, Ken & Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  18. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapopor (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Haugen, Jason D. 2009. Hyponymous objects and Late Insertion. Lingua 119. 242–262.
  21. Hu, Xuhui. 2018. Encoding events: Functional structure and variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Hu, Xuhui. 2022a. Predicate formation in the XS-Model. In Linnaea Stockall, Luisa Martí, David Adger, Isabelle Roy & Sarah Ouwayda (eds.), For Hagit: A celebration (QMUL Occasional Papers in Linguistics 47) https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sllf/media/sllf-new/department-of-linguistics/hagit-borer-celebration/Hu.pdf.
  23. Hu, Xuhui. 2022b. Same root, different categories: Encoding direction in Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 53(1). 41–85.
  24. Huang, C.-T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Richard Larson, Sabine latridou, Uptal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.), Control and grammar, 109–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  25. Huang, C.-T. James. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 253. 1–43.
  26. Huang, C.-T. James. 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Yen-hui Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, Wei-Tian Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  28. Kayne, Richard. 2022. Antisymmetry and externalization. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 43. 1–20.
  29. Li, Yafei. 1990. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8. 177–207.
  30. Li, Yafei. 1995. The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 255–282.
  31. Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, Morphological Merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 253–270. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  32. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 201–225.
  33. Marantz, Alec. 2007. Phases and words. In Sook-Hee Choe, Dong-Wee Yang, Yang-Soon Kim, Sung-Hun Kim, & Alec Marantz (eds.), Phases in the theory of grammar, 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.
  34. Mateu, Jaume. 2012. Conflation and incorporation in resultatives. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 252–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  35. May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  36. Pylkkänen, Linda. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  37. Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77. 766–797.
  39. Roberts, Ian G. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  40. Roberts, Ian G. 2019. Parameter hierarchies and universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Roberts, Ian G. & Anders Holmberg. 2010. Introduction. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Syntactic variation in the minimalist program: The null subject parameter, 1–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Rothstein, Susan. 2003. Secondary predication and aspectual structure. In Ewald Lang, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Handbook on adjuncts, 553–590. Berlin: Mouton.
  43. Snyder, William. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77(2). 324–342.
  44. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2001. The structures of depictive and resultative constructions in Chinese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22. 191–221.
  45. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2007. A syntactic account of the Direct Object Restriction in Chinese. Language Research 43. 53–75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/scl-2023-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2470-8275 | Journal ISSN: 1017-1274
Language: English
Page range: 95 - 122
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2022
Accepted on: Mar 6, 2024
Published on: Sep 14, 2024
Published by: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Xuhui Hu, published by The Chinese University of Hong Kong, T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.