Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigating the Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Adopt E-Learning in a Small Island Developing State (SIDS) Economy: Evidence from Mauritius Cover

Investigating the Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Adopt E-Learning in a Small Island Developing State (SIDS) Economy: Evidence from Mauritius

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Al-Harbi. K.A, (2011). 'e-Learning in the Saudi tertiary education Potential and challenges" Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol.9, pp 31-46.10.1016/j.aci.2010.03.002
  2. Al-Adwan. A.M, Al-Adwan, A.H. and Smedley. J. (2013), 'Exploring students acceptance of e- learning using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian Universities', International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, Vol.9 Issue 2. pp.4-18
  3. Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M.M Chatfield and Migdadi. M. (2015). "The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-govemment adoption and use", Computer in Human Behaviour, Vol.53 pp. 189-203.10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025
  4. Alkandari B„ (2010), 'An Investigation of the Factors Affecting Students' Acceptance and Intention to Use E-Learning Systems at Kuwait University: Developing a Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning Environments". https://repository.cardiffmet.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10369/7531/Badriah%20Alkandari%20Thesis%
  5. Arbaugh. j, B, (2002), 'Managing trie on-line classroom: a study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses". Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol.13, pp. 203-223.10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00049-4
  6. Arbaugh. J. B.. and Duray. R. (2002) 'Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses-An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs', Management Learning, Vol.33 Iss 3, pp. 331-34710.1177/1350507602333003
  7. Aguda-Peregrina, A.F., Hemadez-Garcia, A and Pascual-Miguel, F.J. (2014), "Behavioural intention, use behaviour and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning", Computer in Human Behaviour, Vol.34, pp.301-31410.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
  8. Berger, N, S, (1999), "Pioneering experiences in distance learning: Lessons learned". Journal of Management Education, Vol. 23, pp. 684-690.10.1177/105256299902300606
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). 'Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use. and user acceptance of information technology'. MIS Quarterly, Vol.13 Issue 3, pp 319-340.10.2307/249008
  10. Costabile. M.F., De Marsilo, M., Lanzitotti, R., Plantamura, V.L and Roselli, T. (2005). 'On the Usability Evaluation of E-Learning Applications', System Sciences, HICSS '05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  11. Davis, F. D.. Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw. P. R. (1989) "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models." Management Science, Vol.35 Issue 8, pp.982-100310.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  12. Dwivedi, Y, Wade, K. & Schneberger, M.R. (2012), Information Systems: Explaining and predicting our digital society, Vol.2. Springer Science & Business Media10.1007/978-1-4419-9707-4
  13. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  14. Finley. M. (1992). "Belling the bully", HR Magazine, Vol.37 Issue 3, pp.82-86.
  15. Gefen, D., & Straub. D. (2000). "The relative importance ot perceived ease of use In IS Adoption*. Journal of Vie Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, Issue 8, pp.1-2810.17705/1jais.00008
  16. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan
  17. Harlwick, J, and Barki, K, (1994), 'Explaining the role of user participation in information system use*, Management Science, Vol.40, Issue 4. pp.440-46510.1287/mnsc.40.4.440
  18. Hinton, P.R., Brownlow, C, McMurray, I and Cozens, B. (2004), SPSS Explained, First Edition, Routledge Publication, New York10.4324/9780203642597
  19. Hsu M. K.. Wang S. W„ & Chiu K. K. (2009), 'Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self- efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior An empirical study of online MBA learners', Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.25, pp.412-42010.1016/j.chb.2008.10.003
  20. Hung. S.Y. Chang. CM., and Kuo. S.R (2013). 'User acceptance, of mobile e-govemment services: An empirical study" Government Information Quarterty, Vol.30, Issue 1, pp.33-4410.1016/j.giq.2012.07.008
  21. Jahangir N. and Begum N. (2008). 'The role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, security and privacy, and customer attitude to engender customer adaptation in the context of electronic banking". African Journal of Business Management, Vol.2 Issue 1, pp. 32-40.
  22. Jong, D. and Wang, T.S. (2009), "Student acceptance of web-based learning system", In proceeding of the 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications (WISA 2009), pp.533-536
  23. Joo, y,j, Bong, M. and Choi. H.J. (2000), *Se|f-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic serf-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in a web-based instruction'. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol.48, Issue 2, pp5-1710.1007/BF02313398
  24. Karjaluoto. H„ Mattila. M„ and Pento. T. (2002). "Factors underlying attitude formation towards online banking in Finland'. International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 20 Issue 6, pp.261-27210.1108/02652320210446724
  25. Kattoua, T., Al-Lozi. M. and Alrowwad, A. (2016), "A Review of Literature on E-Leaming Systems in Higher Education", International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (UBMER), Vol 7, lss.5. pp. 754-762
  26. Kim, K.. S Moore J. (2005). 'Web-Based Learning: Factors Affecting Student' Satisfaction and Learning Experience', First Monday, Vol. 10,11-34.10.5210/fm.v10i11.1294
  27. King. W.R. and He. J. (2006). "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model'. Journal Information and Management Archive, Vol 43 Issue 6. pp.740- 75510.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
  28. Lee. M. K. O.. Cheung. C. M. K.. & Chen. Z. (2005). 'Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation'. Information & Management, Vol.42 pp.1095-1104.10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
  29. Lee. V. and Hsiao. C. (2014), "An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance', Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 30, Issue 5, pp.562-579.10.14742/ajet.381
  30. Lee. B,. Yoon. J, and Lee, I., (2009), "Computers & Education Learners' acceptance of e- learning in South Korea: Theories and results'. Computers & Education, Vol 53, Iss 4 pp.1320-1329. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.01410.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
  31. Legris. P, and Ingham. J,. (2003), 'Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model A critical review of the technology acceptance model'. Information & Management. Vol.40 pp.191-20410.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  32. Legris, P., Ingham. J., & Collerette. P. (2002). "Why do people use information technology' A critical review of the technology acceptance model". Information & Management, Vol. 40. pp.191-20410.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  33. Leidner. D. L„ and Jarvenpaa. S. L. (1995), "The rise of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view". MIS Quarteriy, Vol. 19, pp.265-29110.2307/249596
  34. Liaw, S,S, and Huang, H.M, (2011), "A study of investigating learner's attitudes towards e- leaming". 5" International Conference on Distance Learning and Education, Vol, 12, pp.28-32
  35. Loewenthal, K. M. (2004), An introduction to psychological tests and scales, 2"° edition ,Hove, UK: Psychology Press
  36. Lopez. D.A and Manson. D.P. (1997). *A Study of Individual Computer Self-efficacy and Perceived Usefulness of the Empowered Desktop Information System'. Science and Education, pp.83-92
  37. Masoumi, D. (2010), Quality in e-leaming within a cultural context: The Case of Iran. Gothenburg studies in educational sciences. Sweden
  38. Moon. J.W and Kim, Y.G. (2001). " Extending the TAM for a World-Wide- Web context". Information and Management, Vol. 38, Issue 4, pp.217-32010.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  39. Mulwa. A.S, (2017), 'The influence of |CT Infrastructure on readiness to adopt e-leaming in secondary schools in the Kituiu District Kenya", University of Nairobi. Department of Extra-Mural Studies
  40. Olson: P,w„ (2005),, "Significant success factors in distance learning", International Journal of Case Method Research & Application, Vol.17, pp.235-245
  41. Park, S, Y. (2009). "An analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model In understanding university students* behavioral intention to use e-Learning". Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp.150-162
  42. Park, N. (2010). 'Adoption and use of computer-based voice over Internet protocol phone service: Towards an integrated model', Journal of Communication, Vol.60, Issue 1, PP40-7210.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01440.x
  43. Park, N,. Roman R„ Lee, S. and Chung. J.E. (2009). "User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An adoption of the technology acceptance model", International Journal of Information Management, Vol.29, Issue 3, ppl96-20910.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.07.001
  44. Pelias. N.. (2014). "The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life". Computer in Human Behaviour, DOI:10.1016Vj.chb.2014.02.048.
  45. Pituch. K. A.. 5 Lee. Y. K. (2006). "The influence of system characteristics on e-learnmg use", Computers & Education, Vol. 47, pp.222-244.10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
  46. Punnoose. A.C. (2012). 'Determinants of Intention to Use eLearning based on the Technology Acceptance Model*. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Volume: 11, pp.1-3710.28945/1744
  47. Rabaa'i, A.A. (2016), 'Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to assess Students Behavioural Intentions to adopt an e-Leaming System: The Case of Moodle as a Learning Tool". Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol 7. Issue 1 pp. 13-30
  48. Romiszowski. A,J„ (2004), "How is the E-leaming Baby ? Factors Leading to Success or Failure of an Educational Technology Innovation". Educational Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp.5-27
  49. Salmon. G. (2000). -Computer mediated conferencing for management learning at the open university', Management Learning, Vol. 31, pp. 491-502.10.1177/1350507600314005
  50. Sanchez-Prieto, J., CHmos-Miguelafiez. S. and Garcia-Pefialvo, F. (2017), 'MLearning and pre- service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model". Computers in human behavior, Vol. 72, Issue 1 pp.644-65410.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061
  51. Santos, D. Renda. L.M. and Shintaro. O. (2013), "Understanding E-Learning Adoption among Brazilian Universities: An Application of the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior". Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol.49 Issue 3 pp.363-37910.2190/EC.49.3.e
  52. Schepers, J, and Wetzels. M, (2007). "A meta-analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model: Investigation subjective norm and moderations effects, Information and Management, Vol. 44, pp 90-10310.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
  53. Selim. H. M. (2003), 'An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course web sites'. Computers & Education, Vol.40, pp.343-^36010.1016/S0360-1315(02)00142-2
  54. Selim, H.M., (2007). "Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance Confirmatory factor models", Computers & Education. Vol. 49, pp-396-41310.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
  55. Shroff, R.H., Deneen. C.C, and Ng. E.M.W (2011). "Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 27, Issue4 pp. 600-61810.14742/ajet.940
  56. Simmering. M. J.. Posey, C„ & Piccoli G. (2009). 'Computer Self-Efficacy and MotJvation to Leam in a Self-Directed Online Course". Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Vol 7, Issue 1, pp. 99-12110.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00207.x
  57. Snae, C. and Brueckner. M. (2007), 'Ontology-Driven E-Learning System Based on Roles and Activities for Thai Learning Environment", Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, Vol 3. Pp.1-1710.28945/382
  58. Su. S, & Tsai. C„ (2013), "Extending the TAM Model to Explore the Factors Affecting Intention to Use Telecare Systems'. Journal of Computers, Vol. 8 Issue 2, pp.525-53210.4304/jcp.8.2.525-532
  59. Subramanian. G.H. (1994), "A Replication of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Measurement*. Decision sciences, Vol.25, Issue 5, pp. 863-874.10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01873.x
  60. Suki. N. M. and Ramayah. T. (2010), 'User acceptance of the e-govemment services in Malaysia: Structural equation modelling approach', Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, Vol. 5. pp.395-41310.28945/1308
  61. Sun. P., Tsai. R.. Finger. G„ Chen, Y. and Yeh. D. (2007), "What drives a successful e- Leaming? An empirical Investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction", Computers & Education, pp. 1-20
  62. Sun. H, and Zhang. P, (2006) "The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance". International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, pp.53-7810.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
  63. Tagoe. M.A. and Abakah. E. (2014).* Determining Distance Education Students' Readiness for Mobile Learning at University of Ghana Using the Theory of Planned Behavior". International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, Vol.10 No.1, pp91-l06
  64. Tang. Y, & Wei, H,. (2013), "The Journal of Academic Librarianship Distance Learners' 'Self- efficacy and Information Literacy Skills." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol 39 Issue 6, pp.517-521. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.00810.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.008
  65. Tarhlni. A,. Hone, K. & Liu. X, (2014). "The effects of individual differences on e-leammg users' behaviour in developing countnes: A structural equation model". Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.41, pp.153-16310.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020
  66. Taylor, J. (1996), 'The continental classroom: teaching labor studies on-line". La&or Studies Journal, Vol.21, pp.19-38.
  67. Taylor, S. and Todd. P.A. (1995). 'Understanding Information technology usage: a test of competing models", Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 Issue 2, pp. 144-176.10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  68. Teo. T. (2008). 'A path analysis of pre-service teachers attitudes toward computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context', Interactive Learning Environments, Vol.18 Issue 1, pp65-7910.1080/10494820802231327
  69. Thurmond. V.A.. Wambach. K. and Connors. H.R. (2002), "Motivation online performance: the influences of goal setting and Internet self- efficacy'. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp149-16010.1177/089443930202000205
  70. Venkatesh, V. (1999), "Creation of favourable user perceptions: Exploring the role Intrinsic motivation'. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, Issue 2. pp239-26010.2307/249753
  71. Venkatesh. V. and Davis F. (2000), 'A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model". Management Science, Vol. 46 pp. 186-204.10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  72. Womble. J. C. (2007). "E-leaming: The Relationship among Learner Satisfaction, Self-efficacy, and Usefulness". (Doctoral dissertation), Alliant International University, Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=oSyz3R5YTAIC
  73. Wu, J„ Tennyson, R.D, and Hsia, T,, (2010), "Computers & Education A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-leaming system environment'. Computers & Education, Vol.55 lss.1,pp.155-16410.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
  74. Yousafzai. S. Y., Foxall, G. R., and Pallister, J. G. (2007), "Technology acceptance: A meta- analysis of the TAM: Part 1", Journal of Modeling in Management, Vol. 2,251-280.10.1108/17465660710834453
  75. Yuen, A. H. K. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Vol 10, Issue 3 pp.365-382
  76. Yuen, A.H.K. and Ma. W.K. (2008). "Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology". Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 229-24310.1080/13598660802232779
  77. Zamuddm. A. & Kamaluddin, N.. (2012). 'Exploring Malay students' commitment in Online Learning - A Case of Business Management Students". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67 (November 2011), pp.81-92. Retrieve from http://dx.doi.Org/lO.l016/j.sbspro.2012.11.309.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.309
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2018-0040 | Journal eISSN: 2344-5416 | Journal ISSN: 1842-4120
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 160
Published on: Jan 18, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2019 Rajesh Sannegadu, Dhuvandranah Seethiah, Kiran Dookhony-Ramphul, Raj Gunesh, Krishan Seethiah, Heeranee Jugessur, published by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.