Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effective and Democratic Governance as the Condition of Digital Social Innovations in Europe Cover

Effective and Democratic Governance as the Condition of Digital Social Innovations in Europe

Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Adam, Frane, and Maruša Gorišek. 2020. “Meritokracija Med Mitom, Normo in Realnostjo.” Družboslovne Razprave 36 (94/95): 217–38.
  2. Almond, Gabriel. 1966. “Comparative Politics.” edited by G. Bigham Powell. Boston, Toronto: Little, Brown and Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_1.
  3. Baker, Susan, and Abid Mehmood. 2015. “Social Innovation and the Governance of Sustainable Places.” Local Environment 20 (3): 321–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.842964.
  4. Blondel, Jean. 1972. Comparing Political Systems. Praeger.
  5. Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=52899.
  6. Economist Intelligence Unit. n.d. “Social Innovation Index 2016. Perspectives from The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)”. Accessed March 27, 2021. https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/technology-innovation/old-problems-new-solutions-measuring-capacity-social-innovation-across-world-0.
  7. Etzioni, Amitai. 1964. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  8. Friedrich, Carl J. 1972. The Pathology of Politics: Violence, Betrayal, Corruption, Secrecy and Propaganda. New York: Harper and Row.
  9. Galego, Diego, Frank Moulaert, Marleen Brans, and Gonçalo Santinha. 2021. “Social Innovation & Governance: A Scoping Review.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630.
  10. Gaye Karacay. 2021. “The Role of Societal Culture in Social Innovation: Creating Social Value via Social Entrepreneur Standpoint”. In Creating Social Value Through Social Entrepreneurship, edited by Mine Afacan Fındıklı and Duygu Acar Erdur, 86–101. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4727-4.ch005.
  11. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.
  12. Greckhamer, Thomas, Santi Furnari, Peer C. Fiss, and Ruth V. Aguilera. 2018. “Studying Configurations with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Best Practices in Strategy and Organization Research”. Strategic Organization 16 (4): 482–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487.
  13. Harrison, Lawrence E., and Samuel P. Huntington. 2001. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.
  14. Hickson, David J., and Derek S. Pugh. 2002. Management Worldwide: Distinctive Styles Among Globalization, 2nd ed. London: Penguin.
  15. Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  16. Hofstede, Geert. 2011. “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
  17. Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind ; Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. Revised and Expanded Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. ‘Hofstede Insights’. n.d. Hofstede Insights. Accessed July 2, 2021. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/.
  19. Hyden, Goran. 1999. “Governance and Reconstitution of Political Order.” In State Conflict and Democracy in Africa, 179–97. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. https://www.rienner.com/title/State_Conflict_and_Democracy_in_Africa.
  20. Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  21. Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Illustrated edition. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Jelovac, Dejan, and Mateja Rek. 2010. Komuniciranje v medkulturnem okolju. Ljubljana: Vega.
  23. Kleindienst, Petra. 2017. “Understanding the Different Dimensions of Human Dignity: Analysis of the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia on the »Tito Street« Case.” DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review 8 (3): 117–37. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/danb-2017-0009.
  24. Kleindienst, Petra. 2019. “Zgodovinski temelji sodobne paradigme človekovega dostojanstva.” Phainomena.
  25. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
  26. Massey, Andrew, and Karen Johnston-Miller. 2016. “Governance: Public Governance to Social Innovation?” Policy & Politics 44 (4): 663–75. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314×14042230109592.
  27. Mikulan Kildi, Janja, and Victor Cepoi. 2017. “The Importance of the Political Order for Peace.” Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research 9 (1): 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-12-2015-0206.
  28. Minkov, Michael, and Geert Hofstede. 2011. “The Evolution of Hofstede's Doctrine.” Edited by Katharina Chudzikowski, Gerhard Fink, and Wolfgang Mayrhofer. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 18 (1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601111104269.
  29. Nesta. 2019. “The European Digital Social Innovation Index.” Nesta. 2019. https://www.nesta.org.uk/feature/european-digital-social-innovation-index/.
  30. Parra, Constanza. 2013. “Social Sustainability: A Competing Concept to Social Innovation?” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Trans-disciplinary Research, 142–54. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  31. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  32. Parsons, Talcott. 1967. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: The Free Press.
  33. Pierre, Jon, and B. Guy Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  34. Ragin, Charles. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://books.google.si/books/about/Fuzzy_Set_Social_Science.html?id=nZC2dLUH-OAC&redir_esc=y.
  35. Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond.
  36. Ragin, Charles C., and Sean Davey. n.d. Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 3.1b. Irvine: Department of Sociology, University of California. Accessed March 27, 2021. http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml.
  37. Rauschmayer, Felix, Jouni Paavola, and Heidi Wittmer. 2009. “European Governance of Natural Resources and Participation in a Multi-Level Context: An Editorial’. Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (3): 141–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.504.
  38. Rek, Mateja. 2006. ‘Dileme transnacionalne civilne družbe’. Družboslovne razprave 22 (51): 33–54.
  39. Rek, Mateja. 2012. “Civic Experts : The Case of the EU.” Research in Social Change 4 (1): 37–61.
  40. Smith, David Horton, and Jacqueline Macaulay, eds. 1980. Participation in Social and Political Activities, 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  41. Social Progress Imperative. n.d. “Social Progress Index”. Social Progress Imperative. Accessed March 27, 2021. https://www.socialprogress.org/.
  42. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14.2. n.d. College Station: StataCorp LLC. Accessed March 27, 2021. https://www.stata.com/stata14/.
  43. Swyngedouw, Erik. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869.
  44. Sztompka, P. 1993. “Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies.” Zeitschrift Für Soziologie 22: 85–95.
  45. Thomas, Vinod. 2000. The quality of growth. Oxford University Press ; http://digitallibrary.un.org/record/429262.
  46. United Nations Development Programme. n.d. “Human Development Index (HDI) | Human Development Reports.” Accessed sJuly 16, 2021. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.
  47. World Bank. n.d. “WGI 2020 Interactive > Home.” Accessed March 27, 2021. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/.
  48. Yale Center for Environmental Law, and Policy and Center for International Earth Science Information Network Earth Institute, Columbia University. 2020. “Environmental Performance Index.” 2020. https://epi.yale.edu/about-epi.
  49. Ziegler, Rafael. n.d. ‘Social Innovation and the Capability Approach’. Global Trends, 4.
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 62
Published on: Aug 29, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Tea Golob, Matej Makarovič, Matevž Tomšič, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.