
Figure 1:
Geological map indicating the two traverses and the sampling points.

Figure 2:
Variation between the magnetic intensity and that of (a) Uranium concentration, (b) Thorium concentration, (c) Potassium concentration at T1.

Figure 3:
Variation between the magnetic intensity and that of (a) Uranium concentration, (b)Thorium concentration, (c) Potassium concentration at T2.

Figure 4:
Contour map showing the distribution of (a) magnetic intensity, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T1.

Figure 5:
Contour map showing the distribution of (a) magnetic intensity, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T2.

Figure 6:
3D Surface plot of (a) magnetic anomaly, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T1.

Figure 7:
3D surface plot of (a) magnetic anomaly, (b) uranium concentration, (c) thorium concentration, (d) potassium concentration in T2.

Figure 8:
Regression plot between magnetic anomalous response to (a) uranium concentration, (b) thorium concentration, (c) potassium concentration.