Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Withdrawal versus continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cover

Withdrawal versus continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram showing the study selection process for the systematic review of withdrawal versus continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with HFimpEF.

Figure 2.

Forest plot showing pooled odds ratio for relapse of left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure recurrence after withdrawal versus continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy. Squares represent individual study estimates and the diamond represents the pooled effect using a random-effects model.

Quality assessment of observational studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

StudySelection (0–4)Comparability (0–2)Outcome (0–3)Total score (0–9)
Chen et al., 2021 [10]4127
Lee et al., 2023 [11]4228
Chen et al., 2025 [8]4228
Vaduganathan et al., 2024 [9]4228
Basile et al., 2025 [12]4228

Risk of bias assessment of interventional studies using RoB2

StudyRandomization ProcessDeviations from Intended InterventionsMissing Outcome DataOutcome MeasurementSelection of Reported ResultsOverall Risk
Halliday, 2019LowSome concernsLowLowLowLow risk
Segan, 2025LowSome concernsLowLowLowLow risk
Bakhsh, 2020Some concernsSome concernsLowLowSome concernsSome concerns

GRADE assessment of certainty of evidence

OutcomeNo. of studiesStudy designRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication biasOverall certainty
Relapse of left ventricular systolic dysfunction3Randomized/prospective withdrawal studiesNot seriousNot seriousNot seriousSeriousNot suspectedModerate
Heart failure hospitalization3Observational cohortsSeriousNot seriousNot seriousSeriousNot suspectedLow
Mortality3Observational cohortsSeriousSeriousNot seriousSeriousNot suspectedVery low

Study characteristics of the included studies

StudyCountryStudy designPopulationSample size
Halliday, 2019 [5]United KingdomRandomized clinical trialRecovered dilated cardiomyopathy51
Bakhsh, 2020 [6]CanadaPilot withdrawal studyRecovered dilated cardiomyopathy22
Chen, 2021 [10]ChinaProspective observational cohortDilated cardiomyopathy with improved EF70
Segan, 2025 [7]AustraliaRandomized clinical trialAtrial fibrillation–mediated cardiomyopathy with recovered EF60
Lee, 2023 [11]South KoreaProspective registry cohortPost-myocardial infarction HF with restored EF726
Chen, 2025 [8]ChinaRetrospective cohortHF with improved EF4,560
Vaduganathan, 2024 [9]InternationalRegistry cohortHF with improved EF8,728
Basile, 2025 [12]SwedenRegistry-based observational cohortHF with improved EF8,728

Interventions and reported outcomes

StudyInterventionComparatorPrimary reported outcomes
Halliday, 2019 [5]Withdrawal of HF therapyContinued HF therapyRelapse of cardiomyopathy
Bakhsh, 2020 [6]Withdrawal of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockersContinued therapyDecline in LVEF; recurrence of LV dysfunction
Chen, 2021 [10]Spironolactone withdrawalContinued spironolactoneRelapse of cardiomyopathy
Segan, 2025 [7]Withdrawal of HF therapyContinued therapyMaintenance of LVEF; quality of life
Lee, 2023 [11]Discontinuation of RAAS inhibitorsContinued RAAS inhibitorsAll-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, HF hospitalization
Chen, 2025 [8]GDMT discontinuationContinued GDMTMajor adverse cardiovascular events; recurrent HF
Vaduganathan, 2024 [9]Withdrawal of GDMT componentsContinued GDMTCardiovascular mortality; HF hospitalization
Basile, 2025 [12]Withdrawal of RASi/ARNi, beta-blockers, or MRAContinued therapyCardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization

Search strategies used in the electronic databases

DatabaseSearch StrategyResults
PubMed (MEDLINE)(“Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction” [MeSH] OR HFrEF OR “systolic heart failure”) AND (“Recovered Ejection Fraction” OR “improved ejection fraction” OR “recovered LVEF” OR HFrecEF) AND (“Drug Withdrawal”[MeSH] OR “therapy withdrawal” OR “treatment discontinuation” OR “withdrawal of pharmacologic treatment”)14
Embase(‘heart failure with reduced ejection fraction’/exp OR ‘systolic heart failure’ OR HFrEF) AND (‘ejection fraction’/exp AND (recovered OR improved)) AND (‘drug withdrawal’/exp OR ‘treatment discontinuation’ OR ‘therapy interruption’ OR ‘pharmacologic withdrawal’)184
LILACS (BVS/DeCS)(“insuficiencia cardíaca con fracción de eyección reducida” OR “insuficiencia cardíaca sistólica” OR HFrEF) AND (“fracción de eyección recuperada” OR “mejoría de fracción de eyección”) AND (“retiro del tratamiento” OR “suspensión de la terapia” OR “abandono del tratamiento” OR “interrupción terapéutica”)12
Cochrane CENTRAL(“heart failure” OR HFrEF) AND (“recovered ejection fraction” OR HFimpEF OR HFrecEF) AND (“therapy withdrawal” OR “drug discontinuation” OR “treatment withdrawal”)38
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2026-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2501-062X | Journal ISSN: 1220-4749
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 8, 2026
Published on: Jul 22, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Juan Camilo Hernández Jaramillo, Juan Esteban Suárez Muñoz, María Cristina Oviedo Arroyo, María José Díaz Gutiérrez, Gloria Ibis Tirado Romero, published by N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT