Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical construct validity and subgroup stability of the Romanian version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in nerve-conduction-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome – a cross-sectional study Cover

Clinical construct validity and subgroup stability of the Romanian version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in nerve-conduction-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome – a cross-sectional study

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

STROBE-style flow diagram of patient and hand selection. Detailed exclusion criteria are provided in Table 1. CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; NCS, nerve conduction studies.

Table 1.

Number of excluded patients/hands (216 patients, 355 hands)

Exclusion criterionPatientsHands
history of paresis or cervical radiculopathy11
diabetic polyneuropathy1012
previous fractures or malunited callus of wrist22
prior carpal tunnel decompression surgery710
local glucocorticoid injection ≤3 months11
local physiotherapy ≤3 months11
pregnancy or postpartum ≤6 months24
decompensated hypothyroidism12
rheumatoid arthritis2234
psoriatic arthritis810
spondyloarthritis58
systemic lupus erythematosus1015
systemic sclerosis2229
Sjögren’s disease913
gout78
undifferentiated arthritis11
lack of diagnostic nerve conduction study criteria711
Total116162

[i] Note: Exclusion categories were recorded as mutually exclusive for reporting purposes. When more than one exclusion criterion was met, the primary reason for exclusion was recorded. The following exclusion criteria did not apply to any screened patient: age under 18 years, diagnosis of acute carpal tunnel syndrome, proximal compressive neuropathies (e.g., thoracic outlet syndrome), use of oral contraceptives within the preceding 6 months, acromegaly, chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis.

Table 2.

General and CTS characteristics of the sample (n = 100)

demographicsCTS characteristics
age (years)58.5±9.8right dominant hand95%
women93.0%left dominant hand3.0%
menopause age (years)47.8±5.6ambidextrous2.0%
urban dwelling62.0%history of CTS67.0%
secondary school10.0%time from menopause to CTS (years)12.0±9.5
high school64.0%bilateral CTS97.0%
college26.0%unilateral CTS of dominant hand3.0%
professionally active57.0%unilateral CTS of nondominant hand0
smoking, current18.0%professional vibration exposure23.0%
smoking, ever37.0%occupation involving manual load handling82.0%
alcohol, frequent48.0%keyboard work38.0%
BMI (kg/m2)29.2±5.0professional repetitive maneuvers83.0%
arterial hypertension57.0%extended flexion or extension52.0%
Raynaud’s phenomenon3.0%cold work environment30.0%

[i] Notes: “Professional vibration exposure” referred to regular use of vibrating tools or equipment. “Occupation involving manual load handling” referred to regular lifting, carrying, pushing, or pulling of objects during work. “Keyboard work” referred to regular occupational computer or keyboard use. “Professional repetitive maneuvers” referred to repeated hand or wrist movements performed as part of work tasks. “Extended flexion or extension” referred to sustained or repeated wrist flexion or extension during occupational activity. “Cold work environment” referred to regular work in low-temperature environments or exposure to cold surfaces/materials.

[ii] Abbreviations: BMI – body mass index; CTS – carpal tunnel syndrome.

Figure 2.

Median SSS (left; p = 0.006) and FSS scores (right; p < 0.001) according to the NCS-defined CTS severity class. P-values represent the significance level of Kruskal-Wallis tests. Per-group hand counts of NCS severity categories: mild (n=56), moderate (n=90) and severe (n=47).

Abbreviations: BCTQ - Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; CTS – carpal tunnel syndrome; FSS - Functional Status Scale; SSS - Symptom Severity Scale.

Table 3.

Exploratory item-level analysis of the BCTQ questions and NCS-defined CTS severity (n=193 hands).

mild (n=56)moderate (n=90)severe (n=47)
SSS question 60.004227.3%21.3%6.4%*
427.3%25.8%55.3%*
SSS question 80.049229.1%*12.4%10.6%
40%*11.2%10.6%
SSS question 90.005230.9%*14.6%10.6%
51.8%*15.7%25.5%*
SSS question 100.01251.8%*15.7%10.6%
SSS question 110.00249.1%11.2%36.2%*
FSS question 1<0.001158.2%48.3%6.4%*
314.5%18.046.8%*
50%0%4.3%*
FSS question 2<0.001152.7%*39.3%6.4%*
45.5%*16.9%29.8%*
501.1%17.0%*
FSS question 3<0.001130.9%23.6%4.3%*
410.9%19.1%40.4%*
FSS question 4<0.001240.0%*13.5%10.6%
320.0%21.3%42.6%
FSS question 50.03757.3%16.9%29.8%*
FSS question 70.001429.1%29.5%53.2%*
FSS question 80.006147.3%40.3%19.1%*
3 29.1%18.0%44.7%*

[i] Notes: Only response categories contributing to significant χ2 associations are displayed. Asterisks (*) indicate standardized residuals ≥±1.96. Analyses are exploratory and were not corrected for multiple comparisons.

[ii] Abbreviations: BCTQ - Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; CTS - carpal tunnel syndrome; FSS - BCTQ’s Functional Status Scale; NCS - nerve conduction studies; SSS – BCTQ’s Symptom Severity Scale.

Figure 3.

Forest plots of linear mixed models to predict SSS (panel A) and FSS scores (panel B).

Notes: Each estimate comes from a separate adjusted model as specified in Table 4. For Tinel's and Phalen's signs, the plotted coefficient represents absence versus presence of the sign.

Abbreviations: FSS - Functional Status Scale; MCV - Motor Conduction Velocity; SCV - Sensory Conduction Velocity; SSS - Symptom Severity Scale.

Table 4.

Associations between BCTQ scores and clinical, NCS, and patient-reported measures

Spearman’slinear mixed models* for F/SSS
rhopB95% CIppseudo-R2
grip strengthSSS−0.1610.028−0.431−0.727; −0.1350.0050.108
FSS−0.392<0.001−0.355−0.552; −0.158<0.0010.289
SCVSSS−0.330<0.001−0.298−0.429; −0.166<0.0010.181
FSS−0.308<0.001−0.273−0.361; −0.184<0.0010.332
MCVSSS−0.1900.012−0.221−0.415; −0.0270.0260.054
FSS−0.272<0.001−0.250−0.374; −0.126<0.0010.168
F waveSSS0.0070.924−0.067−0.191; 0.0560.283-
FSS−0.1850.011−0.100−0.193; −0.0080.0340.005
SNAPSSS−0.333<0.001−0.276−0.411; −0.142<0.0010.130
FSS−0.337<0.001−0.208−0.299; −0.117<0.0010.197
CMAPSSS−0.1330.077−0.855−1.428; −0.2810.0040.127
FSS−0.3050.000−0.879−1.268; −0.490<0.0010.189
DMLSSS0.300<0.0011.4840.661; 2.308<0.0010.127
FSS0.311<0.0011.3280.750; 1.905<0.0010.187
EQ-5D-5L DSSSSS0.381<0.0010.8820.488; 1.277<0.0010.125
FSS0.592<0.0010.9880.720; 1.255<0.0010.337
Mann Whitneylinear mixed models* for F/SSS
no vs. yes&pB95% CIppseudo-R2
Absence of Tinel’s signSSS31 (13) vs 36 (15)<0.001−6.569−9.529; −3.610<0.0010.239
FSS18 (13) vs 25 (13)<0.001−3.739−5.675; −1.802<0.0010.338
Absence of Phalen’s signSSS30 (12) vs 35 (13)<0.001−6.124−9.012; −3.236<0.0010.224
FSS15 (11) vs 24 (13)<0.001−4.235−6.012; −2.457<0.0010.365

* mixed linear models additionally included, for grip strength, the covariates: age, sex and CTS severity; for SCV, MCV and F wave, the covariates: age, sex and education level; for EQ-5D-5L, Tinel and Phalen signs, the covariates: age, sex, grip strength and CTS severity. Each predictor was analyzed in a separate linear mixed-effects model with patient ID as random intercept. Models for grip strength were adjusted for age, sex, and NCS severity; SCV/MCV/F-wave models for age, sex, and education; EQ-5D-5L, Tinel's sign, and Phalen's sign models for age, sex, grip strength, and NCS severity. Spearman correlations and Mann-Whitney tests are descriptive and exploratory, as they do not account for within-patient clustering. Presence of the clinical sign (Tinel’s and Phalen’s) was the reference category.

& BCTQ scores are reported as median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: BCTQ - Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; CI - confidence interval; CMAP - Compound Muscle Action Potential; CTS - carpal tunnel syndrome; DML - distal motor latency; DSS – descriptive severity score; FSS - Functional Status Scale; MCV - Motor Conduction Velocity; SCV - Sensory Conduction Velocity; SNAP - Sensory Nerve Action Potential; SSS - Symptom Severity Scale.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2026-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2501-062X (formerly 1220-4749) | Journal ISSN: 1220-4749
Language: English, Romanian
Submitted on: May 19, 2026
Published on: May 27, 2026
Published by: N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Daniela Nicoleta Popescu, Claudiu Popescu, Oana Morari, Natalia Blidaru, Alice Rakoczy, Magda Ileana Parvu, Cătălin Codreanu, Luminița Enache, published by N.G. Lupu Internal Medicine Foundation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.