Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
One-year mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing TAVI: a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis Cover

One-year mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing TAVI: a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Full Article

Introduction

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive valvular disease of ageing populations, often complicated by pulmonary hypertension (PH). The coexistence of PH in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates imposes additional haemodynamic burden, elevating right-ventricular (RV) load and impairing peri-procedural stability [13]. While TAVI has transformed AS management across risk strata, the specific mortality burden associated with PH in this population warrants further characterisation [4].

Mechanistically, PH often arises from chronic left-sided pressure overload, pulmonary venous hypertension and eventual pulmonary vascular remodelling [57]. These changes can lead to right-ventricular-pulmonary-arterial (RV–PA) uncoupling and diminished cardiac output reserve. Prior research has indicated that PH may be associated with increased frailty and mortality [810]. However, with ongoing technological and procedural refinements in TAVI, it is important to synthesise contemporary evidence regarding the observed mortality rates in patients with PH [11].

Previous reviews have been limited by heterogeneous PH definitions, mixed-risk populations and incomplete long-term data [1215]. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis to (i) quantify 1-year all-cause mortality among TAVI patients with PH, (ii) assess the influence of study quality on reported mortality rates and (iii) identify methodological and biological factors contributing to outcome variation. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current mortality landscape for TAVI patients with PH, highlighting areas for improved standardisation and future research.

Methods

1. Protocol and registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024582949).

2. Search strategy

A comprehensive electronic search was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science from database inception to 18 September 2024, with no language restrictions. The strategy combined text words and MeSH terms related to ‘transcatheter aortic valve implantation’, ‘TAVI’, ‘pulmonary hypertension’ and ‘mortality’. Reference lists of eligible papers and relevant reviews were hand-searched to identify additional studies. Full search syntax is available in Supplementary Appendix 1.

3. Eligibility criteria

Studies were included if they (1) enrolled adults (≥18 years) with severe AS undergoing TAVI, (2) defined PH by echocardiography or right-heart catheterisation, (3) reported ≥1-year all-cause mortality or longer follow-up and (4) were primary observational cohorts with extractable outcome data. Systematic reviews were considered for qualitative synthesis to provide context on prior research but were not included in the quantitative meta-analysis.

Exclusion criteria include duplicate cohorts, non-TAVI populations, small series (<10 patients), abstracts without full text or studies lacking outcome reporting.

4. Study selection

Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full texts using Covidence. Conflicts were resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer. The database search identified 54 records. After removing duplicates (n = 4), 50 titles/abstracts were screened and 17 studies met the inclusion criteria (11 observational cohorts for quantitative synthesis and 6 systematic reviews for qualitative synthesis). No additional eligible studies were found through citation or grey-literature searches. The study selection process is summarised in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (Figure 1).

Figure 1

PRISMA diagram. TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

5. Data extraction

Two reviewers independently extracted data using standardised Cochrane templates capturing study design, setting, sample size, mean age, PH definition and measurement method, follow-up duration and primary/secondary outcomes. Extracted data were cross-verified for accuracy before synthesis.

6. Quality and risk-of-bias assessment

Quality of observational cohorts was evaluated with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) (maximum 9 stars: 4 for Selection, 2 for Comparability, 3 for Outcome). Systematic reviews were appraised using the ROBIS tool across four domains (study eligibility, identification/selection, data collection, synthesis) for the qualitative context. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The detailed NOS scores for observational studies are presented in Table 1, and ROBIS assessments for included systematic reviews are summarised in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 1

NOS quality scores.

Author, yearSelection (0–4)Comparability (0–2)Exposure/outcome (0–3)Total score (max 9)
Ben-Dor, 2011 [1]3 – Clear TAVR cohort, well-defined PH and outcomes1 – Adjusted for major confounders (age, EF)2 – Outcome data from registry follow-up6/9
Boxhammer, 2024 [11]4 – Comprehensive systematic selection per PRISMA2 – High comparability across included studies3 – Detailed exposure definitions and synthesis9/9
Miyamoto, 2022 [10]3 – Clear inclusion (AS + TAVR + PH), defined outcomes2 – Multivariate analysis controlling for confounders3 – Prospective data with validated measures8/9
Schewel, 2015 [4]3 – Consecutive TAVR cohort, PH defined echocardiographically and invasively2 – Groups balanced for baseline risk3 – Robust outcome assessment (RHC validation)8/9
D’Ascenzo, 2015 [5]3 – Multi-centre registry, clear inclusion/exclusion2 – Adjusted for multiple covariates3 – Standardised data collection and outcomes8/9
Testa, 2016 [6]3 – Defined PH subgroups in TAVR patients2 – Adjusted for key comorbidities2 – Outcome ascertainment moderate quality7/9
Bishu, 2014 [7]3 – Consecutive TAVR cases, PH defined by ECHO1 – Partial adjustment for confounders2 – Retrospective but consistent outcomes6/9
Luçon, 2014 [2]4 – Very large TAVR cohort (n > 2000), robust selection2 – Full multivariate modelling3 – Validated outcome measures (mortality)9/9
Alushi, 2019 [8]3 – Prospective invasive cohort, clear PH definition2 – Adjusted for baseline characteristics3 – Comprehensive follow-up for outcomes8/9
Lindman, 2015 [3]3 – PARTNER I registry, well-defined PH and outcomes2 – Propensity matching for confounders3 – Robust outcome assessment8/9
Rodés-Cabau, 2010 [9]3 – Canadian multicentre, clear inclusion/exclusion2 – Adjusted for baseline variables2 – Long-term follow-up for mortality7/9

1 AS, aortic stenosis; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; PH, pulmonary hypertension.

Table 2

ROBIS quality assessment (systematic reviews)

Author, yearEligibility criteriaSearch and selectionData handlingSynthesis and reportingOverall judgement
Khalil, 2024 [12]Adults with severe AS undergoing TAVR; PH status and mortality outcomes clearly definedPRISMA-based, multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, WoS), dual screeningDual extraction, NOS usedRandom-effects meta-analysis; sensitivity and subgroup analyses; transparent reportingLow risk/high quality
Tang, 2017 [13]Clear inclusion: TAVR, PH-assessed, mortality outcomes reportedPRISMA-guided, 2 independent reviewers, comprehensive database searchData extracted systematically; NOS usedRandom-effects model, meta-regression, publication bias (EGGER/ BEGG).Low risk/high quality
Desai, 2023 [14]Clear inclusion: TAVR + PH studies ≥100 pts. excluded poor-quality studiesPRISMA-based multi-database search, dual screeningStructured data extraction and NOS quality gradingNarrative synthesis (heterogeneity prevented pooling)Moderate quality/some concerns
Meybodi, 2024 [15]Included TAVR studies with PH data and outcomes; excluded duplicates/overlapsComprehensive multi-database search (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest), predefined strategyExtracted ORS, meta-regression to test covariates; publication bias tested (EGGER, Begg)Pooled 33 studies, random-effects model, heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis describedLow risk/high quality
Boxhammer, 2022Severe AS + PH, focus on non-invasive diagnostics; English-only inclusionSystematic PubMed Central® search with explicit search terms and PRISMA flowAbstract + full-text screening, duplicate removal; descriptive data extractionNarrative synthesis across 39 studies (echo, CT/MRI, biomarkers)Moderate quality/some concerns (narrative only)
Kokkinidis, 2018Severe as undergoing TAVR; studies reporting PH and mortalitySystematic search; inclusion criteria clearData pooled appropriately, risk of bias discussedRandom-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity/ subgroup analysesModerate-high quality

1 AS, aortic stenosis; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; PH, pulmonary hypertension.

Table 3

ROBIS summary (low-to-moderate overall risk)

Author, yearTypeInclusion criteriaNo. of studiesPH definitionMain findingsQuality toolOverall judgement
Khalil, 2024 [12]Systematic review + meta-analysisSevere AS + TAVI, PH & mortality reported15Echo or RHCPooled PH ↑ mortalityROBISLow risk/high quality
Tang, 2017 [13]Systematic review + meta-analysisTAVI, PH assessed, mortality outcomes11Per studyPH increased mortalityROBISLow risk/high quality
Desai, 2023 [14]Systematic review≥100 pts, TAVI + PH10VariousNarrative synthesis onlyROBISModerate/some concerns
Meybodi, 2024 [15]Systematic review + meta-analysisTAVI + PH data33VariousPooled analysis confirms riskROBISLow risk/high quality
Boxhammer, 2022Systematic review (diagnostic)Severe AS + PH (non-invasive)39Echo, CT, MRIPH diagnosis methods heterogeneousROBISModerate/some concerns
Kokkinidis, 2018Systematic review + meta-analysisSevere as undergoing TAVI20Echo-basedPH associated with mortalityROBISModerate–high quality

1 AS, aortic stenosis; PH, pulmonary hypertension; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

7. Statistical analysis

Study-level event proportions for 1-year all-cause mortality were logit-transformed and pooled using a DerSimonian–Laird random effects model. Results are expressed as pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was quantified using Cochran Q and I2 statistics (low < 25%, moderate 25–75%, high > 75%). Subgroup analyses were prespecified by study quality (NOS ≥ 8 vs 6–7) and PH definition (echocardiography vs right-heart catheterisation). Sensitivity analyses used leave-one-out resampling. Publication bias was explored using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test (if ≥10 studies). All analyses were conducted in RevMan 5.3 and R (meta package v6.3-1).

Results

1. Study characteristics

Eleven observational cohorts (N = 10,665 patients) were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Six systematic reviews were included for qualitative synthesis and contextualisation. Cohort sizes ranged from 277 to 2435 patients, with mean ages between 79 years and 85 years. Most studies defined PH as sPAP ≥ 40 mm Hg by echocardiography, while others used mPAP ≥ 25 mm Hg via right-heart catheterisation. Follow-up durations ranged from 12 months to 36 months. Baseline characteristics and outcome data for all included observational cohorts are shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Characteristics of observational studies.

Author, yearPopulation/designNPH definitionMean age (years)Ejection fraction (%)1-year mortality (%)Key findings
Ben-Dor, 2011 [1]Single-centre TAVI registry509sPAP ≥ 40 mmHg (echo)81.747.544.0PH independently predicted mortality
Boxhammer, 2024 [11]Single-centre, sex-stratified303sPAP threshold per study82.65517.2Higher risk signal; sex interaction
Miyamoto, 2022 [10]OCEAN-TAVI (multicentre)1,872sPAP > 36 mmHg (echo)84.758.515.9Residual/new-onset PH ↑ mortality
Schewel, 2015 [4]Single-centre (Hamburg)559mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg (RHC)79.849.523.4Invasive PH remained an independent predictor
D’Ascenzo, 2015 [5]Multicentre (Italy)674sPAP > 40 mmHg (echo)81.5 ± 5.651 ± 11.631.0Persistent PH strongest predictor
Testa, 2016 [6]CoreValve multicentre registry900sPAP > 60 mmHg79.55011.6Severe PH predicts 1-year mortality
Bishu, 2014 [7]Single-centre (Mayo Clinic)277PASP tertiles (≥49 mmHg)81 ± 853 ± 1535.0Highest tertile → highest mortality
Luçon, 2014 [2]FRANCE-2 (national)2435sPAP ≥ 40/ ≥ 60 mmHg83 ± 749 ± 1528.0PH independently predicted mortality
Alushi, 2019 [8]Prospective invasive cohort617Echo/RHC PH80 ± 856 ± 427.0Invasive PH and RV parameters predictive
Lindman, 2015 [3]PARTNER I registry2180mPAP ≥ 25 (mod/sev ≥ 35)83 ± 85525.0PH predicted mortality – - esp. in women
Rodés-Cabau, 2010 [9]Canadian multicentre339sPAP > 60 mmHg81 ± 855 ± 1422.1PH associated with late mortality

1 PH, pulmonary hypertension; RV, right-ventricular; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

2. Quantitative data synthesis (meta-analysis)

Across the 11 observational cohorts, the pooled 1-year allcause mortality was 24.5% (95% CI 20.0%-29.6%; I2 = 96.7%). High-quality studies (NOS ≥ 8; n = 7, N = 8640) reported a pooled 1-year mortality of 23.7% (95% CI 19.7%-28.1%), while moderatequality studies (NOS 6–7; n = 4, N = 2025) showed 26.2% (95% CI 13.2%–45.3%). The pooled 1-year mortality across all cohorts is illustrated in the forest plot in Figure 2. Subgroup analyses stratified by study quality are shown in Figure 3 (high-quality studies) and Figure 4 (moderate-quality studies). Due to significant heterogeneity in reporting and definitions across the included studies, a robust quantitative subgroup analysis based on specific PH definitions (e.g., echocardiographic vs right-heart catheterisation) or severity was not feasible within the scope of this meta-analysis.

Figure 2

Overall 1-year mortality forest plot. CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3

High-quality studies (NOS ≥ 8). CI, confidence interval; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Figure 4

Moderate-quality studies (NOS 6–7). CI, confidence interval; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

3. Qualitative synthesis of systematic reviews

Six systematic reviews were included to provide a broader context of the existing literature on PH and TAVI outcomes. These reviews consistently reported an association between PH and adverse outcomes after TAVI, highlighting the complexity and variability in PH definitions and prognostic implications. They also underscored the need for standardised assessment and reporting. Details of these systematic reviews and their quality assessments are provided in Tables 2 and 3.

Discussion

This systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis provide a comprehensive synthesis of 1-year all-cause mortality rates among patients with PH undergoing TAVI. Drawing on data from 11 observational cohorts comprising over 10,000 patients, our findings indicate a substantial pooled 1-year mortality rate of 24.5% in this specific patient population. This underscores that patients with PH continue to experience high mortality rates following TAVI, even amidst advancements in procedural technology and patient selection. The consistency of these rates across high- and moderate-quality studies (23.7% vs 26.2%) suggests a persistent clinical challenge (see Figures 24).

1. Mechanistic and pathophysiological insights from literature

The observed high mortality rates in patients with PH undergoing TAVI are likely influenced by a complex interplay of factors, as highlighted by existing literature. Chronic left-sided pressure overload in AS can lead to post-capillary PH, which may progress to combined pre- and post-capillary disease involving increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary vascular remodelling [57]. These changes can impair RV–pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling, limiting the RV’s ability to adapt to haemodynamic shifts during and after TAVI. Individual studies, such as those by Alushi et al. [8] and Schewel et al. [4], have demonstrated that invasively measured PH, particularly when associated with elevated PVR or reduced RV function, is strongly associated with mortality. Similarly, Lindman et al. [3] and Ben-Dor et al. [1] observed that PH severity correlates with 1-year mortality, even after adjusting for comorbidities and baseline left ventricular function in their respective cohorts. Furthermore, the persistence or progression of PH post-procedure, rather than its absolute baseline value, has been suggested by some studies (e.g., D’Ascenzo et al. [5], Testa et al. [6] and Luçon et al. [2]) to be a powerful determinant of long-term outcomes. These insights, derived from individual study analyses, provide a pathophysiological context for the high mortality rates observed in our descriptive meta-analysis.

2. Determinants of heterogeneity

A prominent feature of the current synthesis is the substantial heterogeneity observed across studies (I2 ≈ 96.7%). This high degree of heterogeneity is not purely statistical but reflects genuine clinical and methodological diversity among the included observational cohorts. Key factors contributing to this variability include the definition and quantification of PH, which varied markedly – ranging from echocardiographic systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP ≥ 40 mmHg) to invasive mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg). Echocardiographic estimations are known to have variability and can sometimes overstate prevalence, whereas invasive right-heart catheterisation, while offering greater precision, was used in only a subset of cohorts. The inconsistent application of PH severity classifications (mild, moderate or severe) and the distinction between pre- and post-capillary phenotypes further contribute to this heterogeneity. Additionally, differences in device generation, operator experience and evolving procedural strategies (e.g., transfemoral vs transapical approaches) across the study periods may also play a role. Despite this variability, the consistent finding of high 1-year mortality rates across studies, even in contemporary series such as Boxhammer [11] and Miyamoto [10], highlights the enduring clinical significance of PH in this population.

3. Comparison with previous reviews

Earlier systematic reviews, including those by Tang [13], Kokkinidis (2018) and Desai [14], have consistently reported an association between PH and mortality after TAVI [16]. More recent meta-analyses by Khalil [12] and Meybodi [15] have further confirmed this association. Our descriptive meta-analysis contributes to this body of evidence by specifically quantifying the pooled 1-year all-cause mortality rate in TAVI patients with PH from primary observational cohorts and stratifying these results by study quality. While previous reviews often mixed different endpoints or included systematic reviews in their quantitative synthesis, our approach provides a focused descriptive estimate of mortality from primary data. The stratification by study quality (NOS ≥ 8 vs 6–7) yielded remarkably consistent mortality estimates (23.7% vs 26.2%), suggesting that the observed high mortality is robust across studies of varying methodological rigour. This synthesis, by focusing on primary observational data for quantitative pooling and using systematic reviews for qualitative context, offers a refined perspective on the mortality burden.

4. Clinical implications

The consistent finding of high 1-year mortality rates in TAVI patients with PH has direct implications for clinical practice. While PH should not necessarily contraindicate TAVI, its presence signals the need for enhanced peri-procedural vigilance and post-procedural surveillance. Comprehensive pre-TAVI right-heart evaluation, including assessment of RV systolic function, tricuspid regurgitation severity and PVR, should be routinely incorporated for candidates with suspected PH. Optimisation of volume status and afterload reduction prior to TAVI may improve haemodynamic stability, particularly in patients with combined post-capillary or mixed PH. Post-procedural reassessment of pulmonary pressures and RV function can help identify patients with persistent PH who may benefit from closer follow-up or consideration of adjunctive pharmacotherapy targeting pulmonary vasculature, as suggested by individual studies [17,18].

Future research should aim to standardise PH assessment and classification in TAVI populations. Integrating echocardiographic, invasive and biomarker-based measures into a unified framework could refine prognostic modelling. Prospective, multicentre studies with standardised right-heart catheterisation and longitudinal follow-up are essential to delineate reversible vs fixed components of PH. Moreover, clinical trials exploring pulmonary vasodilator or RV-targeted therapies – particularly in patients with mixed or residual PH – may open new avenues for improving outcomes beyond mechanical valve replacement.

Conclusion

Patients with PH undergoing TAVI exhibit a high 1-year all cause mortality rate, approaching 25%. This descriptive meta-analysis highlights that despite technological progress and procedural refinements, PH continues to represent a significant clinical challenge in this population. The substantial heterogeneity observed across studies underscores the need for standardised PH phenotyping and the integration of comprehensive right-heart functional assessment into pre-TAVI evaluation. Such measures are essential to improve risk stratification, optimise patient selection and guide post-procedural management, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients.

Notes

[5] Conflicts of interest Conflicts of interest

None declared.

[6] Registration

PROSPERO CRD42024582949.

[7] Data availability

All data derived from published sources.

[8] Ethics

Not applicable (systematic review of published studies).

[9] Declaration of interest, funding and ethical statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this work. No funding sources were received for the preparation, analysis or publication of this systematic review. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of data extracted exclusively from previously published studies. Therefore, ethical committee approval and patient consent were not required, as no new human participants or identifiable data were involved. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

[10] Central message

This is the largest systematic review evaluating cardiac CT for the detection of pulmonary hypertension, including 43 studies and ~40,000 patients.

[11] Perspective message

The review highlights critical methodological gaps and provides clear recommendations for future research, including standardisation of CT thresholds, prospective validation and uniform reporting.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjc-2026-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2734-6382 | Journal ISSN: 1220-658X
Language: English
Published on: Aug 7, 2026
Published by: Romanian Society of Cardiology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Haytham Emara, Nadia Emara, Aigerim Sadykova, Ali Hammoud, Shady Emara, published by Romanian Society of Cardiology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.