Have a personal or library account? Click to login

(Un)Real: The role of cognitive biases in young people’s assessment of news accuracy

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621
  2. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  3. Baek, T. H. (2017). The value of the third-person effect in theory building. Review of Communication, 17(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2017.1295164
  4. Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2018). Fake News and The Economy of Emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
  5. Balmas, M. (2014). When Fake News Becomes Real: Combined Exposure to Multiple News Sources and Political Attitudes of Inefficacy, Alienation, and Cynicism. Communication Research, 41(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212453600
  6. Banning, S. A. (2001). Do You See What I See?: Third-Person Effects on Public Communication Through Self-Esteem, Social Stigma, and Product Use. Mass Communication and Society, 4(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0402_01
  7. Banning, S. A. (2006). Third-Person Effects on Political Participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300404
  8. Banning, S. A., & Sweetser, K. D. (2007). How Much Do They Think It Affects Them and Whom Do They Believe?: Comparing the Third-Person Effect and Credibility of Blogs and Traditional Media. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701665114
  9. Beauvais, C. (2022). Fake news: Why do we believe it? Joint Bone Spine, 89(4), 105371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371
  10. Boulianne, S., & Humprecht, E. (2023). Perceived Exposure to Misinformation and Trust in Institutions in Four Countries Before and During a Pandemic. International Journal of Communication, 17(0), Article 0.
  11. Brosius, H.-B., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.142
  12. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.4.353
  13. Chung, M., & Kim, N. (2021). When I Learn the News is False: How Fact-Checking Information Stems the Spread of Fake News Via Third-Person Perception. Human Communication Research, 47(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa010
  14. Cooke, N. A. (2017). Posttruth, Truthiness, and Alternative Facts: Information Behavior and Critical Information Consumption for a New Age. The Library Quarterly, 87(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1086/692298
  15. Corbu, N., Halagiera, D., Jin, S., Stanyer, J., Strömbäck, J. (…), Aalberg, T. (2025). Illusory superiority about misinformation detection and its relationship to knowledge and fact-checking intentions: Evidence from 18 countries. Mass Communication and Society.
  16. Corbu, N., Oprea, D. A., & Frunzaru, V. (2022). Romanian adolescents, fake news, and the third-person effect: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Children and Media, 16(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1992460
  17. Corbu, N., Oprea, D. A., Negrea-Busuioc, E., & Radu, L. (2020). ‘They can’t fool me, but they can fool the others!’ Third person effect and fake news detection. European Journal of Communication, 35(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903686
  18. Davison, W. P. (1983). The Third-Person Effect in Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
  19. Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
  20. European Commission. (2022a). EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/new-push-european-democracy/protecting-democracy/strengthened-eu-code-practice-disinformation_en
  21. European Commission. (2022b, October 27). The EU’s Digital Services Act. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-services-act_en
  22. European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent high level group on fake news and online disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union. Accesat: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=50271
  23. Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D (2012). “qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data.” Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18.
  24. Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI (2018). “Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper.” Behavior Research Methods, 50, 195–212.
  25. Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003040130125
  26. Golan, G. J., & Day, A. G. (2008). The First-Person Effect and Its Behavioral Consequences: A New Trend in the Twenty-Five Year History of Third-Person Effect Research. Mass Communication and Society, 11(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430802368621
  27. Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X-Rating: The Third-Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00712.x
  28. Guo, L., & Johnson, B. G. (2020). Third-Person Effect and Hate Speech Censorship on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120923003
  29. Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2020). Misinformation and Polarization in a High-Choice Media Environment: How Effective Are Political Fact-Checkers? Communication Research, 47(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671
  30. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations (pp. ix, 326). John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
  31. Hoorens, V., & Ruiter, S. (1996). The optimal impact phenomenon: Beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<599::AID-EJSP773>3.0.CO;2-7
  32. INSCOP. (2023, November 9). Sondaj INSCOP pentru News.ro—Aproape 2/3 dintre români se declară îngrijoraţi foarte mult şi destul de mult de efectele războiului Israel-Hamas. Ameninţările teroriste, cea mai mare temere /Aproape 50% sunt mai îngrijoraţi de conflictul din Ucraina. Accessed: https://www.news.ro/social/sondaj-inscop-news-aproape-2-3-dintre-romani-declara-ingrijorati-foartemult-destul-mult-efectele-razboiului-israel-hamasamenintarile-teroriste-cea-mare-temere-aproape-50-ingrijorati-conflictul-1922400009002023110821377273
  33. Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034
  34. Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
  35. Kahneman, D. (2012). Gândire rapidă, gândire lentă. Publica.
  36. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596
  37. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
  38. Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
  39. Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12164
  40. Lewandowsky, M., & Jankowski, M. (2023). Sympathy for the devil? Voter support for illiberal politicians. European Political Science Review, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577392200042X
  41. Liu, P. L., & Huang, L. V. (2020). Digital Disinformation About COVID-19 and the Third-Person Effect: Examining the Channel Differences and Negative Emotional Outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(11), 789–793. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0363
  42. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
  43. McIntosh, R. D., Moore, A. B., Liu, Y., & Della Sala, S. (2022). Skill and self-knowledge: Empirical refutation of the dual-burden account of the Dunning–Kruger effect. Royal Society Open Science, 9(12), 191727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191727
  44. Michael, R. B., & Breaux, B. O. (2021). The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of “fake news.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00278-1
  45. Molina, M. D., Sundar, S. S., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2021). “Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224
  46. Moravec, P. L., Minas, R. K., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Fake News on Social Media: People Believe What They Want to Believe When it Makes No Sense At All. MIS Quarterly, 43(4), 1343-A13.
  47. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  48. Nygren, T., Guath, M., Axelsson, C.-A. W., & Frau-Meigs, D. (2021). Combatting Visual Fake News with a Professional Fact-Checking Tool in Education in France, Romania, Spain and Sweden. Information, 12(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050201
  49. Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. Political Behavior, 42(3), 939–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
  50. Pantazi, M., Hale, S., & Klein, O. (2021). Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation. Political Psychology, 42(S1), 267–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12797
  51. Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin.
  52. Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Comm. & Society, 3(1), 57-85.
  53. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
  54. Perloff, R., M. (1989). Ego-Involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage. Communication Research, 16(2), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016002004
  55. Perloff, R. M. (1999). The Third Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_4
  56. Rassin, E. (2008). Individual differences in the susceptibility to confirmation bias. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 64(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03076410
  57. Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.163
  58. Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491
  59. Shane, T. (2020, July 27). The psychology of misinformation: How to prevent it. First Draft. https://firstdraftnews.org/articles/the-psychology-ofmisinformation-how-to-prevent-it/
  60. Stanovich, K. E. (2020). Why humans are cognitive misers and what it means for the Great Rationality Debate. In Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality. Routledge.
  61. Statista. (2025, January 30). Romania: People’s attitude regarding the war in Ukraine 2023. Accessed: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1424955/romania-people-s-attitude-regarding-the-war-in-ukraine/
  62. Ştefăniţă, O., Corbu, N., & Buturoiu, R. (2018). Fake news and the third-person effect: They are more influenced than me and you. Journal of Media Research, 11(3).
  63. Steppat, D., Castro Herrero, L., & Esser, F. (2022). Selective exposure in different political information environments – How media fragmentation and polarization shape congruent news use. European Journal of Communication, 37(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211012141
  64. Stubenvoll, M., Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2021). Media Trust Under Threat: Antecedents and Consequences of Misinformation Perceptions on Social Media. International Journal of Communication, 15(0), Article 0.
  65. Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the Third-Person Perception: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
  66. Suntwal, S., Brown, S., & Patton, M. (2020). How does Information Spread? An Exploratory Study of True and Fake News. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64464
  67. Tandoc Jr., E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
  68. Terren, L. T. L., & Borge-Bravo, R. B.-B. R. (2021). Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research, 9. https://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/rcr/article/view/16
  69. The Economist. (2022, April 2). The invasion of Ukraine is not the first social media war, but it is the most viral. Accessed: https://www.economist.com/international/the-invasion-of-ukraine-is-not-the-first-social-media-war-but-it-is-the-most-viral/21808456
  70. Tsay-Vogel, M. (2020). Third‐Person Effect. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0130
  71. Tully, M., Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Designing and testing news literacy messages for social media. Mass Communication and Society, 23(1), 22-46.
  72. Vajpayee, A., Sheokand, U., & Sanghani, P. (2022). Vulnerability Of Fake News In The Human MindAnd Cognition. NeuroQuantology, 20, 1406–1413.
  73. Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
  74. van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Hameleers, M., & Ohme, J. (2023). Can Fighting Misinformation Have a Negative Spillover Effect? How Warnings for the Threat of Misinformation Can Decrease General News Credibility. Journalism Studies, 24(6), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2187652
  75. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder. Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking (Council of Europe Report DGI(2017)09).
  76. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
  77. Yang, J., & Tian, Y. (2021). “Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I Am”: Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 103
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 10, 2025
Published on: Oct 14, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Nicoleta Corbu, Andreea Stancea, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.