References
- Maniar A, Jagannathan B. (2020). The aerosol box. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 36, Suppl S1, 141–43. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_283_20
- Begley L, Lavery KE, Nickson CP, Brewster DJ. (2020). The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthesia, 75, 1014–21. doi: 10.1111/anae.15115
- Sorbello M, Rosenblatt W, Hofmeyr R, Greif R, Urdaneta F. (2020). Aerosol boxes and barrier enclosures for airway management in COVID-19 patients: a scoping review and narrative synthesis. Br J Anaesth., 125(6), 880–94. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.038
- Canelli R, Connor CW, Gonzalez M, Nozari A, Ortega R. (2020). Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med., 382, 1957–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007589
- Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. (1998). Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med., 5, 919–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x
- Dwivedi D, Bhatia P, Aggarwal M, Sen S, Hooda B, Dudeja P. (2020). A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study. J Mar Med Soc, 22, Suppl S1, 88–92. doi: 10.4103/jmms.jmms_100_20
- Kannaujia A, Haldar R, Shamim R, Mishra P, Agarwal A. (2021). Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID19 era: A manikin based pilot study. Saudi J Anaesth 2021;15:86–92. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_1062_20.
- Wakabayashi R, Ishida1 T, Yamada T, Kawamata M. (2020). Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty. Journal of Anesthesia, 34, 790–93. doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02835-2
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Protective Barrier Enclosures Without Negative Pressure Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic May Increase Risk to Patients and Health Care Providers-Letter to Health Care Providers. U.S. Food Drug Adminstration.
- Priyanka AS, Nag K, Hemanth Kumar V R, Singh DR, Kumar S, Sivashanmugam T. (2017). Comparison of King Vision® and TRUVIEW laryngoscope for postextubation visualization of vocal cord mobility in patients undergoing thyroid and major neck surgeries: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth Essays Res, 11, 238–42. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200240
- Bag SK, Hemanth Kumar V R, Krishnaveni N, Ravishankar M, Velraj J, Aruloli M. (2014). A comparative study between TRUVIEW PCD laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottic opening and ease of intubation: A crossover study. Anesth Essays Res, 8, 372–76. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143152