Evaluation of the effect of Intubation Box Use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision® and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Coordinates	TRUVIEW Laryngoscope (n=30)		P value^†	King Vision^® Laryngoscope (n=30)		P value^†
Coordinates	Without I.B.	With I.B.	P value^†	Without I.B.	With I.B.	P value^†
Time to Successful Intubation (sec)	21.2±1.69	31.13±2.15	<0.001	15.80±1.13	23.37±1.17	<0.001
First Pass Intubation Success Rate^*	29	24	0.103	30	26	0.112
Click	0	7	0.011	0	6	0.024
Pogo Score^*	75–100	75–100	0.744	100	100	1.00

Values are presented as numbers or mean ± S.D.

I.B: intubation box, POGO: percentage of glottic opening.

* Values are presented as numbers (%)

† statistically significant difference (P<0.05)

Comparison of Coordinates of Tracheal Intubation Difficulty Among the Two Laryngoscopes With And Without Use of Intubation Box.

Coordinates	With Intubation Box			Without Intubation Box
Coordinates	TRUVIEW video-laryngoscope (n=30)	King Vision^® video-laryngoscope (n=30)	P value^†	TRUVIEW video-laryngoscope (n=30)	King Vision^® video-laryngoscope (n=30)	P value^†
Intubation Time (sec)	31.13±2.15	23.37±1.17	<0.001	21.20±1.69	15.80±1.13	<0.001
First Pass Success^*	24	26	0.729	29	30	1.00
Click	7	6	1.00	0	0	1.00
POGO Score^*	75%(n=6)	100(N=30)	0.011	75%(n=5)	100(n=30)	0.021
	100%(n=24)			100%(n=25)