References
- Almquist, J., Orpwood, G., Lundquist E & Lidar, M. (2019). Analysing validity: The case of Swedish national tests in year 6 science. Research Report 2019. University of Uppsala
- Barwell, R., Clarkson, P., Halai, A., Kazima, M., Moschkovich, M., Planas, N., Phakeng, M.S., Valero, P. & Villavicencio Ubillús, M. (Eds.). (2021). Mathematics Education and Language Diversity. The 21st ICMI Study. Springer. (International Commission on Mathematical Instruction).
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175-192.
- Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Heidelberg: Springer (Mathematics Education Library 19). (Original: 1998). Théorie des situations didactiques. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.)
- Caillot, M. (2007). The Building of a New Academic Field: the case of French didactiques. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 131–134.
- Chevallard, Y. (2010). La didactique, dites-vous? Éducation et Didactique, 4(1), 139-148.
- Christensen, T.S., Hobel, P., Niss, M. and Rørbech, H. (eds) (2021). Sammenlignende fagdidaktik 6. Fagdi- daktisk vidensproduktion – samarbejde mellem forskere og praktikere i praksis (Comparative subject didactics 6. Subject didactic production of knowledge – collaboration between researchers and practicians in practice). Sammenlignende fagdidaktik. https://tidsskrift.dk/sammenlignendefagdi-daktik/index
- Clarke, D. J. (2001). Teaching/Learning. In D. J. Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms (pp. 291–320). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
- Clarke, D. J. (2006). Using international comparative research to contest prevalent oppositional dichotomies. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 38(5), 376–387.
- Cramer, C. & Schreiber, F. (2018). Subject Didactics and Educational Sciences: Relationships and their Implications for Tacher Education from the View- point of Educational Sciences. RISTAL. Research in Subject-Matter Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 150-164.
- Deng, Z. (2016). Bringing curriculum theory and didactics together: a Deweyan perspective. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 75-99.
- Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’ curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179-196.
- Dorier, J.-L., Leutenegger, F. & Schneuwly, B. (eds.) (2013). Didactique en construction - Constructions en didactique(s). Collection Raisons Educatives. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- GeoCapabilities (2016). Subject-Specific Project of the European Union on the contribution of Geography as a school subject to the overall education of learners, coordinated by the London Institute of Education (D. Lambert). www.geocapabilities.org (15.09.2022). (See also Lambert 2014).
- Gundem, B. B. (1998). Understanding European Didactics: an overview. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (eds.) (1998/2002). Didaktik and/or Curriculum. An International Dialogue. Bern/New York: Peter Lang. (Cited by Hamilton 2007 - ‘The manifold European traditions of didactics’).
- Hamilton, D. (1999). The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England?). Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 7,1 135-152.
- Hnik, O. (2014). Didaktika literatury: výzvy oboru: od textů umělecké povahy k didaktice esteticko-výchov-ného oboru. Praha: Karolinum.
- Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained Teaching: the common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109-124.
- Hordern, J. (2022). Deliberative educational traditions and the post-truth society. In E. Krogh, A. Qvortrup & S. T. Graf (eds.), Bildung, Knowledge and Global Challenges in Education: Didaktik and Curriculum in the Anthropocene Era. London: Routledge, pp. 113-129.
- Hordern, J., Muller, J. & Deng, Z. (eds.) (2021). Towards Powerful Educational Knowledge? Perspectives from Educational Foundations, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik. Special Issue of Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2). London.
- Horlacher, R. (2017). The Educated Subject and the German Concept of Bildung. London: Routledge.
- Hudson, B. & Schneuwly, B. (eds.) (2007). Didactics – Learning and Teaching in Europe. Thematic Issue of European Educational Research Journal, 6(2). doi: 10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.12.
- Hudson, B. & Meyer, M. (eds.) (2011). Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning and Teaching in Europe. Opladen: Budrich.
- Hudson, B., Gericke, N., Olin-Scheller, C. & Stolare, M. (eds.) (2022a). International Perspectives on Knowledge and Quality. Implications for Innovation in Teacher Education Policy and Practice. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
- Hudson, B., Gericke, N., Olin-Scheller, C. & Stolare, M. (eds.) (2022b). International Perspectives on Knowledge and Curriculum. Epistemic Quality across School Subjects. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. (Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13-30. (Reprinted in Westbury, Hopmann & Riquarts (eds.), (2000), pp 139-159).
- Klafki, W. (2000). The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 85-107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Konieczka-Śliwińska, D. (2016). Higher Education Reform in Poland. An Example of Training for Candidates for the Teaching Profession. Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal, 8/1, 43–54. Krogh, E. (2022). Subject matter didactics as an academic discipline: reflections on the Danish setting. Unpublished manuscript.
- Krogh, E. Qvortrup, A. & Graf, S. T. (eds.) (2021). Didaktik and Curriculum in Ongoing Dialogue. London: Routledge.
- Lambert, D. (2014). Curriculum leadership and the knowledge-led school. In M. Young, D. Lambert, & M. Roberts (Eds.), Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice (pp. 157-187). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Ligozat, F., Coquidé, M., Marlot, C., Verscheure, I. & Sensevy, G. (2014). Didactiques et/ou didactique. Poursuivre le travail de problématisation. Éducation & Didactique, 8(1), 101-115.
- Ligozat, F., Amade-Escot, C. & Östman, L. (2015). Beyond Subject Specific Approaches of Teaching and Learning: Comparative Didactics. Interchange 46:4, 313–321. (DOI 10.1007/s10780-015-9260-8). (Special Issue on Comparative Didactics).
- Ligozat, F. & Almqvist, J. (2018). Conceptual frameworks in didactics – learning and teaching: Trends, evolutions and comparative challenges. Special Issue of European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 3-16.
- Ligozat, F., Almqvist, J., Klette, K. (eds.) (in print). Didactics in a Changing World. European Perspectives on Teaching, Learning and the Curriculum. London: Routledge.
- Marty, L., Venturini, P., Almqvist, J. (2018). Teaching Traditions in Science Education in Switzerland, Sweden and France: A comparative analysis of three curricula. European Educational Research Journal (online), 17(1): 51-70.
- Mesiti, C., Artigue, M., Hollingsworth, H., Cao, Y. & Clarke, D. (eds). (2021). Teachers Talking about their Classrooms. Learning from the Professional Lexicons of Mathematics Teachers around the World. London: Routledge.
- Muller, J. & Hoadley, U. (2021). A pedagogic compact: retrieving ‘powerful’ educational knowledge from Didaktik and curriculum studies. Special Issue “Towards Powerful Educational Knowledge?” Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 166-178 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887360 ).
- Nielsen, F.V. (2005). Didactology as a Field of Theory and Research in Music Education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Spring, 2005), pp. 5-19.
- Nielsen, F.V. (2011). Sammenlignende fagdidaktik: Genstandsfelt, perspektiver og dimensioner (Comparative subject didactics: field of objects, perspectives and dimensions). In E. Krogh and F.V. Nielsen (eds.). Sammenlignende fagdidaktik. Cursiv nr 7. https://dpu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/institut-fordidaktik/cursivskriftserie/Cursiv_7.pdf.
- Nielsen, F.V. (2012). Fagdidaktik som integrativt relationsfelt (Subject didactics as an integrative field of relations). In E. Krogh and F.V. Nielsen (eds.). Sammenlignende fagdidaktik 2 (Comparative subject didactics 2). Cursiv no. 9, 2012.
- Ongstad, S. (2021). Education as language and communication (L&C). In E. Krogh, A. Qvortrup and S.T. Graf (eds.). Didaktik and Curriculum in Ongoing Dialogue, pp. 234-253. Routledge. For open access, see https://www.routledge.com/Didaktik-and-Curriculum-in-Ongoing-Dialogue/Krogh-QvortrupGraf/p/book/9780367568085
- Potvin, P. & Messier, G. (2022). “La didactique” in the province of Québec. Asserting itself while still fragile and under tension. Unpublished manuscript.
- Rakhkochkine, A. (2011). The development of didactics in Russia: National traditions and international influences. In B. Hudson & M. Meyer (eds.), Beyond Fragmentation (pp. 339-350). Opladen: Budrich.
- Rothgangel, M., Abraham, U., Bayrhuber, H., Frederking, V., Jank, W. & Vollmer, H. J. (eds.) (2021). Lernen im Fach und über das Fach hinaus. Bestands- aufnahmen und Forschungsperspektiven aus 17 Fachdidaktiken im Vergleich. 2. Auflage. (Allgemeine Fachdidaktik, Band 2). Münster: Waxmann.
- Rothgangel, M. & Vollmer, H. J. (2020). Towards a Theory of Subject-Matter Didactics. Research in Suject-Matter Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 126-151. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rt1838 ).
- Schneuwly, B. (2011). Subject didactics – An academic field related to the teacher profession and teacher education. In B. Hudson & M. Meyer (eds.), Beyond Fragmentation (pp. 275-286). Opladen: Budrich.
- Schneuwly, B. (2014). Didactique: construction d’un champ disciplinaire. Éducation et Didactique, 8(1), 13-22. (https://DOI10.4000/educationdi-dactique.1860 ).
- Schneuwly, B. (2021). ‘Didactiques’ is not (entirely)‘Didaktik’: The origin and atmosphere of a recent academic field. In Didaktik and Curriculum in Ongoing Dialogue (pp. 164-184). Routledge.
- Schneuwly, B. & Vollmer, H. J. (2018). Bildung and Subject Didactics: Exploring a Classical Concept for Building New Insights. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 37-50.
- Schneuwly, B. (2022). Subject Matter Didactics as an academic discipline. Geneva: Unpublished Ms.
- Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: Meaning and significance. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 1-30). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Schweitzer 2022 (in this volume). International Knowledge Transfer in Subject-Oriented Didactics. The Example of Religious Education.
- Schweitzer, F. & Schreiner, P. (eds.) 2021. International Knowledge Transfer in Religious Education. Münster: Waxmann.
- Sensevy, G. (2011a). Le sens du savoir. Éléments pour une théorie de l’action conjointe en didactique. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Sensevy, G. (2011b). Overcoming Fragmentation: Towards a Joint Action Theory in Didactics. In Hudson, B. & Meyer, M. (eds), Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning and Teaching in Europe. Opladen: Budrich, 60-76.
- Sensevy, G. (2012). About the Joint Action Theory in Didactics. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 15, 503–516. (DOI 10.1007/s11618-012-0305-9).
- Vollmer, H, J. (2007). Zur Situation der Fachdidaktiken an deutschen Hochschulen. Erziehungswissenschaft, 18 (35), 85-103. Also online unter: http://www.fachdidaktik.org
- Vollmer, H. J. (2017). Zur jüngeren Entwicklung der Fachdidaktiken in Deutschland. In H. Bayrhuber et al., (pp. 11–14). Münster: Waxmann.
- Vollmer, H. J. & Bayrhuber, H. (2020). List of subject- didactic terms and expressions (unpublished collection). Hamburg: University of Hamburg.
- Vollmer, H. J. (2021a). Bildung as the Central Category of Education? Didactics, Subject Didactics and General Subject Didactics in Germany. In E. Krogh, A. Qvortrup & S. T. Graf (eds.), Didaktik and Curriculum in ongoing dialogue. London: Routledge, 137-163.
- Vollmer, H. J. (2021b). Powerful Educational Knowledge through Subject Didactics and General Subject Didactics. Recent Developments in German-Speaking Countries. Special Issue “Towards Powerful Educational Knowledge: Educational Foundations, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik”. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53:2, 229-246 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887363 ).
- Vollmer, H. J. & Vogt, K. (2022). Didactics of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. State of the art and research perspectives. (Unpublished).
- Vollmer, H. J. & Klette, K. (in print). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Subject Didactics – an Inter-Continental Dialogue?. In F. Ligozat, Almqvist, J. & Klette, K. (eds.), Didactics in a Changing World. European Perspectives on Teaching, Learning and the Curriculum. London: Routledge, Chapter 2.
- Vondrova, N. (2019). Subject Didactics Research is one of the major research areas in the Faculty of Education of Charles University. Prague: Charles University. Principal Investigator: Nada Vondrova (https://cuni.cz/UKEN-450.html).
- Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a Reflective Practice: What Might Didaktik Teach Curriculum? In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts, (Eds), Teaching as Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15-39). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Wilbergh, I. (2016). Bringing Teaching Back In Norwegian NOU, the school of the future in light of Allgemeine Didaktik Theory of Wolfgang Klafki. Nordic Journal of Pedagogy and Critique, 2, 111-124.
- Young, M. & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229-250. (https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3017)
- Young, M. & Muller, J. (2016). Curriculum and the Specialization of Knowledge. London: Routledge. Zierer, K. (ed.) (2020). Thementeil “Allgemeine Didaktik und Fachdidaktik“. In: Jahrbuch für Allgemeine Didaktik, 2019. Hohengehren: WBV Media.
- Zierer, K. & Seel, N.M. (2012). General didactics and instructional design. Eyes like twins: a transatlantic dialogue about similarities and differences. About the past and future of Two Sciences of Learning and Teaching. SpringerPlus, 1(15), 2-22. (https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-15).