Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examining the effect of physical presence on perceived classroom climate in hyflex spaces Cover

Examining the effect of physical presence on perceived classroom climate in hyflex spaces

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Arbaugh, J.B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (COI) framework: An exploratory study. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
  2. Bandura A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  3. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 248-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  5. Beatty, B. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex
  6. Carlson, R., Dwyer, K., Bingham, S., Cruz, A., Prisbell, M., & Fuz, D. (2006). Connected classroom climate and communication apprehension: Correlations and implications for the basic course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 18, 1-27.
  7. Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments; A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17 (1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3
  8. Dwyer, K., Bingham, S., Carlson, R., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A., & Fuz, D. (2004). Communication and climate: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21, 264-272.
  9. Fraser, B. (2018). Milestones in the evolution of the learning environments field over the past three decades. In D. Zandvliet, & B. Frasier (Eds.), Thirty years of Learning Environments: Looking back and looking forward (pp.1-19). Boston: MA: Brill Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004387720_001
  10. Garrison, E.R, Anderson, T., & Archer W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conference in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2. 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  11. Gascoigne, C. (2012a). Classroom climate and student-to-student interaction in the post-secondary French classroom. The French Review, 85(4), 717-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tfr.2012.0303
  12. Gascoigne, C. (2012b). Toward an understanding of the relationship between classroom climate and performance in postsecondary French: An application of the classroom climate inventory. Foreign Language Annals, 45(2), 193-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01186.x
  13. Gascoigne, C. (2022) Reemerging spaces: Examining classroom climate in the Hyflex Realm. The Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 25,1, 1-18.
  14. Laforune, A.M., & Lakhal, S. (2019). Differences in student perceptions of the Community of Inquiry in a blended synchronous delivery mode. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 45(3), 1-19.
  15. Mcarthur, J. (2015). Matching instructors and spaces of learning: The impact of classroom space on behavioral, affective, and cognitive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/766
  16. McBrien, J., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
  17. Miller, A., Sellnow, D., & Strawser, M. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(2), 202-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418
  18. Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020, June). Decolonization of knowledge-construction in university classrooms: The Place of social constructivism. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development, 9(2), 183+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A673002744/AONE?u=txshracd2590&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=52950a6d
  19. Owston, R. (2013). Blended learning policy and implementation: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.03.002
  20. Romero-Hill, E., & Ripine, C. (2021). Hybrid flexible instruction: Exploring faculty preparedness. Online Learning Journal, 25(3), 289-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2426
  21. Schneider, B., M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
  22. Semin, G., & Smith, E. (2013). Socially situated cognition in perspective. Social Cognition 31(2), 125-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.125
  23. Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online learning environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks (10)1, 35+, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A284325460/AONE?u=txshracd2590&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=8fa9c1e6
  24. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
  25. Smith, E., & Semin, G. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 36 53-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8
  26. Stanton, A., Zandvliet, D., & Dhaliwal, R. (2018). Impacts of learning environments on student well-being in higher education. In D. Zandvliet, & B. Frasier (Eds.), Thirty years of Learning Environments: Looking back and looking forward (pp.141-150). Boston: MA: Brill Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004387720_008
  27. Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. (2016). Towards a framework of interaction in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881391
  28. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
  29. Tinto, V. (2012). Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804545.001.0001
  30. Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key elements of building online community: Comparing faculty and student perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 234-246.
  31. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language (Translation newly revised and edited / by Alex Kozulin.). MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11193-000
  32. Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2015). Understanding classroom roles in inquiry education: Linking role theory and social constructivism to the concept of role diversification. SAGE Open, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015607584
  33. Zandvliet, D. (2018). Looking back and looking forward. In D. Zandvliet, & B. Frasier (Eds.), Thirty years of Learning Environments: Looking back and looking forward (pp.59-71). Boston: MA: Brill Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004387720_004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2025-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 55
Published on: Jun 21, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Carolyn Gascoigne, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.