References
- *Báez, J.C., Marquart, M., Chung, R.Y.E., Ryan, D., & Garay, K. (2019). Developing and supporting faculty training for online social work education: The Columbia University School of Social Work Online Pedagogy Institute. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(4-5), 505-518.
- Bagon, S., Gacnik, M., & Starcic, A.I. (2018). Information communication technology use among students in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(6), 56-72.
- Bawa, P., (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—a literature review. SAGE Open, January–March 2016, pp. 1–11.
- Blignaut, P., Burger, A., McDonald, T., & Tolmie, J. (2009). Computer attitude and anxiety. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition (pp. 647-653). IGI Global.
- *Borup, J., & Evmenova, A.S. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to effective online instruction in a College of Education. Online Learning, 23(2), 1-20.
- Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press: 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648.
- Burrows, S., & Shortis, M. (2011). An evaluation of semi-automated, collaborative marking and feedback systems: Academic staff perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7).
- Cantillon, P., Irish, B., & Sales, D. (2004). Using computers for assessment in medicine. British Medical Journal, 329(7466), pp. 606–609.
- Cox, Milton D. (2003). “Proven Faculty Development Tools that Foster the Scholarship of Teaching in Faculty Learning Communities.” To Improve the Academy 21, no. 1:109–42.
- Crow, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Wuensche, B. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems for programming education: a systematic review. In ACE '18: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference, (2018), pp. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160489.3160492.
- Delcourt, M.A.B., & M.B. Kinzie (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 27, 31–37.
- Eurydice. (2011). Key data on learning and innovation through ICT at school in Europe 2011. Brussels: Eurydice. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/129EN.pdf.
- Deutsch T., Herrmann, K., Frese, T., & Sandholzer, H. (2012). Implementing computer-based assessment–A web-based mock examination changes attitudes. Computers & Education, 58(4), (2012), p. 1068-1075.
- Gachago, D., Morkel, J., Hitge, L., van Zyl, I., & Ivala, E. (2017). Developing eLearning champions: A design thinking approach. International Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 1–14.
- *Geertsema, J. (2021). Faculty development in the context of a research-intensive university. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 230-245.
- *Grier, D., Lindt, S.F., & Miller, S.C. (2021). Formative assessment with game-based technology. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(2), 193-202.
- Grion, V., Cesareni, D. (2016). Multiplicity, fluidity, dialogue and sharing: keywords to under-stand the complex dynamics between human learning and technology. QWERTY, 11(1), 5-10.
- *Henry, D., Brantmeier, E.J., Tongen, A., Jaffee, A.T., & Pierrakos, O. (2021). Faculty Empowering Faculty: SoTL Leaders Catalyzing Institutional and Cultural Change. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 9(2).
- International Journal for Academic Development (2021). Aims and scope. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show5aimsScope&journalCode5rija20
- JISC (2010). Effective Assessment in a Digital Age. A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140613220103/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/digiassass_eada.pdf
- Kalogeropoulos N., Tzigounakis I., Pavlatou E.A., & Boudouvis A.G. (2013). Computer‐based assessment of student performance in programming courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21(4), pp. 671-683.
- Kabakci Yurdakul, I., & Coklar, A.N. (2014). Modeling preservice teachers’ TPACK competencies based on ICT usage. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 363–376.
- *Kehoe, T., Schofield, P., Branigan, E., & Wilmore, M. (2018). The double flip: Applying a flipped learning approach to teach the teacher and improve student satisfaction. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(1), 7.
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
- Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39–51.
- Laksov, K.B. (2008). Strategic educational development. Higher Education Research & Development,27(2),91–93.
- *Little, D., & Moore, J.L. (2021). A typology for catalyzing pedagogical change: Fostering multiple pathways through SoTL. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 262-273.
- Loyd, B.H., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of Computer Attitude Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501–505.
- *Macdonald, R.H., Beane, R.J., Baer, E.M., Eddy, P.L., Emerson, N.R., Hodder, J., Iverson, E.R., McDaris, J.R., O’Connell, K., & Ormand, C.J. (2019). Accelerating change: The power of faculty change agents to promote diversity and inclusive teaching practices. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(4), 330-339.
- *Martinovic, D., Kolikant, Y.B.D., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2019). The Usefulness of Technology in Teacher Professional Development: Extending the Frameworks. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 23(2), 21-36.
- *McCune, V. (2018). Experienced academics’ pedagogical development in higher education: Time, technologies, and conversations. Oxford Review of Education, 44(3), 307-321.
- Meyer, K.A., & Murrell, V. S. (2014). A national study of training content and activities for faculty development for online teaching. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18, 3–18.
- *Mirriahi, N., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2018). Identifying engagement patterns with video annotation activities: A case study in professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1).
- Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 2016, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
- *Moritz, D., Pearce, S., Christensen, L.S., & Stamboulakis, D. (2021). Designing a peer-led approach to teaching review and enhancement in academia. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(1), 7.
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
- National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (2018). Staff Use of Technology-Enhanced Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. https://hub.teachingandlearning.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Technology-Enhanced-Assessment-Insight-NF-2018-with-doi.pdf
- Oldfield, A., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Timmis, S. (2012). Assessment in a digital age: A research review, University of Bristol, Bristol.
- *O'Keeffe, M., Gormley, C., & Ferguson, P. (2018). Moving the focus from grades to feedback: a case study of pass/fail marking. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 70-79.
- Oo, C.Z., Chew, A.W., Wong, A.L., Gladding, J., & Stenstrom, C. (2022). Delineating the successful features of research data management training: A systematic review. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(3), 249-264.
- *Packer, C. (2019). Participant-Centered Adjunct Faculty Development: A Case Study Using the Great Teachers Model. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 23(2), 6-20.
- Pearce, N., Weller, M., Scanlon, E., & Kinsley, S. (2010). Digital scholarship considered: How new technologies could transform academic work. in education, 16 (1).
- *Pekkarinen, V., Hirsto, L., & Nevgi, A. (2020). Ideal vs. experienced: University teachers’ perceptions of a good university teacher and their experienced pedagogical competency. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 32(1), 13-30.
- Phillips, M., (2015). Digital technology integration. In M Henderson & G Romeo (eds.), Teaching and Digital Technologies, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, Australia, pp.318–331.
- *Picasso, F., Doria, B., Grion, V., Venuti, P., Serbati, A. (2023). What Technology Enhanced Assessment and Feedback Practices do Italian Academics Declare in Their Syllabi? Analysis and Reflections to Support Academic Development. In: Fulantelli, G., Burgos, D., Casalino, G., Cimitile, M., Lo Bosco, G., Taibi, D. (eds) Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. HELMeTO 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29800-4_21
- *Podorova, A., Irvine, S., Kilmister, M., Hewison, R., Janssen, A., Speziali, A., Balavijendran, L., Kek, M., & McAlinden, M. (2019). An important, but neglected aspect of learning assistance in higher education: Exploring the digital learning capacity of academic language and learning practitioners. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(4).
- Popovic, C., & Plank, K.M. (2016). Managing and leading change: Models and practices. In D. Baume, & C. Popovic (Eds.), Advancing practice in academic development (pp. 207–224). London: Routledge.
- Popovich, P.M., Hyde, K.R., Zakrajsek, T., & Blumer, C. (1987). The development of the Attitudes Toward Computer Usage Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(1), 261-269.
- Raffaghelli, J.E. (2017). Exploring the (missed) connections between digital scholarship and faculty development: a conceptual analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1-20.
- Redecker, C., Punie, Y. (2017). Digital Competence of Educators. Edited by Yves Punie. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466
- Reimann, N., & Wilson, A. (2012). Academic development in ‘assessment for learning’: the value of a concept and communities of assessment practice, International Journal for Academic Development, 17:1, 71-83.
- Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., Bohle Carbonell, K., Townsend, D., Rozendal, A-P., van der Loo, J., Dekker, P., Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). Online training of TPACK skills of higher education scholars: A cross-institutional impact study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 480–495.
- Rienties, B., Brouwer, N, & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 122–131.
- Ruiz-Jaramillo, J., & Vargas-Yáñez, A. (2018). La enseñanza de las estructuras en el Grado de Arquitectura. Metodología e innovación docente a través de las TIC. Teaching structures on Architecture degrees. ICT-based methodology and teaching innovation. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76 (270), 353-372.
- Sahay, S., & Dawson, K. (2019). A Survey to Investigate Teachers’ Perspectives Toward Technology Integration in Teaching in Delhi, India. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1785-1790). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Sambell, K. & Brown, S. (2020). Kay Sambell and Sally Brown: Covid-19 Assessment Collection. https://sally-brown.net/kay-sambell-and-sally-brown-covid-19-assessment-collection/
- Sappey, J., & Relf, S. (2010). Digital technology education and its impact on traditional academic roles and practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
- Scanlon, E. (2018). Digital scholarship: Identity, interdisciplinarity, and openness. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 5, 3.
- Schwartz., Beth M., and Aeron Haynie. 2013. Faculty Development Centers and the Role of SoTL. New Directions for Teaching and learning, 136: 101–11.
- Serbati, A., Grion, V., Li, L., Doria, B. (2022). Online Assessment: Exemplars as the Best Sources for Comparison Processes?. In Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning (pp. 419-434). Springer, Cham.
- Shortis, M., & Burrows, S. (2009, November). A review of the status of online, semi-automated marking and feedback systems. In ATN Assessment Conference 2009: Assessment in Different Dimensions (p. 302).
- Sim, G., Holifield, P., & Brown, M. (2004). Implementation of computer assisted assessment: lessons from the literature. ALT-J, 12(3), 215-229.
- Soeiro, A., Blaschke, L.M., Brown, M. Farrell, O. (2020). EDEN webinar series: Education in time of a pandemic. How to design and manage assessment for online learning. European Distance and E-Learning Network.
- *Soto, M., Gupta, D., Dick, L., and Appelgate, M. (2019). Bridging Distances: Professional Development for Higher Education Faculty Through Technology-Facilitated Lesson Study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(3).
- *Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Almerich, G., Orellana, N., & Díaz-García, I. (2018). A basic model of integration of ICT by teachers: competence and use. Educational technology research and development, 66(5), 1165-1187.
- Sutherland, K. A. (2018). Holistic academic development: Is it time to think more broadly about the academic development project? International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 261–273.
- Schwartz., B.M., & Aeron Haynie (2013). Faculty Development Centers and the Role of SoTL. New Directions for Teaching and learning, 136: 101–11.
- Sweeney, T., West, D., Groessler, A., Haynie, A., Higgs, B. M.,Macaulay, J., Mercer-Mapstone, L. and Yeo, M. (2017) Where’s the transformation? Unlocking the potential of technology-enhanced assessment’, Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(1), pp. 1-16.
- Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.
- Tonelli D., Grion V., & Serbati A. (2018). L'efficace interazione fra valutazione e tecnologie: evidenze da una rassegna sistematica della letteratura. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3).
- *Troelsen, R. (2021). How to operationalise holistic academic development–The case of a Danish center for teaching and learning. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 254-261.
- Yoo, Y., Lee, H., Jo, J.H., Park, Y. (2015). Educational Dashboards for Smart Learning: Review of Case Studies. In G. Chen, V. Kumar, Kinshuk, R. Huang, S. Kong, (eds) Emerging Issues in Smart Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 145-155, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_21.
- van Dijk, E., van Tartwijk, J., van der Schaaf, M., & Kluijtmans, M. (2020). What makes an expert university teacher? A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks for teacher expertise in higher education. Educational Research Review, 31, 1–16.
- van Petegem, W., Bosman, J. P., De Klerk, M., Strydom, S. (2021). Evolving as a Digital Scholar: Teaching and Researching in a Digital World. Leuven University Press.
- UNESCO, (2012). Technology-Enhanced Assessment in Education. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000220235
- Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice. A&C Black (2011).
- Whitelock, D., & Watt, S. (2008). Reframing e-assessment: Adopting new media and adapting old frameworks. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3) 153-156.
- Whitelock, D., Gilbert, L., & Gale, V. (2011). Technology Enhanced Assessment and Feedback: How is evidence-based literature informing practice? In 2011 International Computer Assisted Assessment (CAA) Conference, Research into e-Assessment, Southampton 05-06 Jul 2011.
- *Zamir, S., & Thomas, M. (2019). The effects of university teachers’ perception, attitude and motivation on their readiness for the integration of ICT in classroom teaching. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(2), 308-326.