Breast DCE-MRI morphological features and semi-quantitative parameters associated with upgrade to invasive carcinoma in biopsyproven DCIS
References
- Tomlinson-Hansen SE, Khan M, Cassaro S. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. PMID: 33620843
- Jatoi I, Shaaban AM, Jou E, Benson JR. The biology and management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Curr Probl Surg 2023; 60: 101361. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2023.101361
- Barreau B, de Mascarel I, Feuga C, MacGrogan G, Dilhuydy MH, Picot V, et al. Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.019
- Raza S, Vallejo M, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 689-99. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3779
- Wisner DJ, Hwang ES, Chang CB, Tso HH, Joe BN, Lessing JN, et al. Features of occult invasion in biopsy-proven DCIS at breast MRI. Breast J 2013; 19: 650-8. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12201
- Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 2005; 11: 382-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00121.x
- Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007; 370: 485-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X
- Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004; 292: 2735-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2735
- Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484
- Takada K, Kashiwagi S, Asano Y, Goto W, Morisaki T, Takahashi K, et al. Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ. BMC Cancer 2020; 20: 513. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07001-1
- Park M, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ. Preoperative prediction of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation of the breast using dynamic contrast enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Korean Soc Magn Reson Med 2013; 17: 101-9. doi: 10.13104/jksmrm.2013.17.2.101
- Miceli R, Gao Y, Qian K, Heller SL. Predicting upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer at surgery with ultrafast imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221: 34-43. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28698
- Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Quinn CM, O’Doherty A, O’Higgins N, Hill AD. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only. J Surg Oncol 2006; 93: 559-63. doi: 10.1002/jso.20445
- Yoon GY, Choi WJ, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Chae EY, Kim HH. The role of MRI and clinicopathologic features in predicting the invasive component of biopsyconfirmed ductal carcinoma in situ. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20: 95. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00494-z
- Lee CW, Wu HK, Lai HW, Wu WP, Chen ST, Chen DR, et al. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 780-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.027
- Lee KH, Han JW, Kim EY, Yun JS, Park YL, Park CH. Predictive factors for the presence of invasive components in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ based on preoperative biopsy. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 1201. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6417-3
- Brennan ME, Turner RM, Ciatto S, Marinovich ML, French JR, Macaskill P, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer. Radiology 2011; 260: 119-28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102368
- Ko MS, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Choi BG, Song BJ, Cha ES, et al. A method to quantify breast MRI for predicting tumor invasion in patients with preoperative biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). J Korean Soc Magn Reson Med 2013; 17: 73-82. doi: 10.13104/jksmrm.2013.17.2.73
- Park AY, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Yoo M, Kim JA, Youk JH. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy for breast mass: preoperative predictors of invasive breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 654-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.01.010
- Goto M, Yuen S, Akazawa K, Nishida K, Konishi E, Kajihara M, et al. The role of breast MR imaging in pre-operative determination of invasive disease for ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by needle biopsy. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1255-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2357-2
- Deurloo EE, Sriram JD, Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, Wesseling J, Rutgers EJ, et al. MRI of the breast in patients with DCIS to exclude the presence of invasive disease. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1504-11. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2394-5
- Nadrljanski M, Maksimovic R, Plesinac-Karapandzic V, Nikitovic M, Markovic-Vasiljkovic B, Milosevic Z. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 1363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.006
- D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, Creech WE, Butler PF, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013
- Verma S, Turkbey B, Muradyan N, Rajesh A, Cornud F, Haider MA, et al. Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 1277-88. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8510
- Khiat A, Gianfelice D, Amara M, Boulanger Y. Influence of post-treatment delay on the evaluation of the response to focused ultrasound surgery of breast cancer by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 308-14. doi: 10.1259/bjr/23046051
- Gelezhe PB, Blokhin IA, Marapov DI, Morozov SP. Quantitative parameters of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of breast cancer prognosis and molecular type: an original study. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 10: 279-92. PMID: 33329930
- Marcotte-Bloch C, Balu-Maestro C, Chamorey E, Ettore F, Raoust I, Flipo B, et al. MRI for the size assessment of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a prospective study of 33 patients. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77: 462-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.003
- Greenwood HI, Heller SL, Kim S, Sigmund EE, Shaylor SD, Moy L. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features. Radiographics 2013; 33: 1569-88. doi: 10.1148/rg.336125055
- Kuhl CK. Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images? Radiology 2009; 253: 281-3. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532091401
- Newstead GM. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 225-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.004
- Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium based contrast material. Radiology 2014; 270: 834-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131669
- Milosevic Z, Bogdanovic D. Breast imaging and percutaneous interventional procedures. In: Dzodic R, editor. Guidelines of Good Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer [Serbian]. Belgrade: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia; 2013. Available at: http://www.azus.gov.rs. Accessed 25 Dec 2025
- Moloney B, Li X, Hirano M, Saad Eddin A, Lim JY, Biswas D, et al. Initial experience in implementing quantitative DCE-MRI to predict breast cancer therapy response in a multi-center and multi-vendor platform setting. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1395502. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395502
- Ochoa-Albiztegui RE, Sevilimedu V, Horvat JV, Thakur SB, Helbich TH, Trattnig S, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 7T for breast cancer diagnosis and characterization. Cancers 2020; 12: 3763. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123763
Language: English
Page range: 356 - 366
Submitted on: Feb 7, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2026
Published on: Sep 7, 2026
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Vladimir Urban, Zorica Milosevic, Zoran Bukumiric, Katarina Obradovic, Nina Adzic, Dragana Pavlovic-Stankovic, Ivana Petkovic, Ivana Sovic, Irena Jovanic, Igor Spurnic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.