References
- Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985; 56: 979-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<;979::aid-cncr2820560502>3.0.co;2-n
- Franquet T, De Miguel C, Cozcolluela R, Donoso L. Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1993; 13: 841-52. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.13.4.8356272
- Moriuchi H, Yamaguchi J, Hayashi H, Ohtani H, Shimokawa I, Abiru H, et al. Cancer cell interaction with adipose tissue: Correlation with the finding of spiculation at mammography. Radiology 2016; 279: 56-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142191
- Lengyel E, Makowski L, DiGiovanni J, Kolonin MG. Cancer as a matter of fat: The crosstalk between adipose tissue and tumors. Trends Cancer 2018; 4: 374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.004
- Wu Y, Li X, Li Q, Cheng C, Zheng L. Adipose tissue-to-breast cancer crosstalk: Comprehensive insights. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022; 1877: 188800. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188800
- Motrescu ER, Rio MC. Cancer cells, adipocytes and matrix metalloproteinase 11: a vicious tumor progression cycle. Biol Chem 2008; 389: 1037-41. doi: 10.1515/BC.2008.110
- Kaushik S, Pickup MW, Weaver VM. From transformation to metastasis: deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2016; 35: 655-67. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9650-0
- Samaržija K, Jurjević Z. Association of the imaging characteristics of desmoplasia on digital breast tomosynthesis and the Ki-67 proliferation index in invasive breast cancer. Croat Med J 2021; 62: 59-67. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.59
- Demirkazık FB, Gülsün M, Fırat P. Mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions. Clinical Imaging 2003; 27: 293-7. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(02)00566-1
- Almasarweh S, Sudah M, Okuma H, Joukainen S, Kärjä V, Vanninen R, et al. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions. Radiol Oncol 2022; 56: 461-70. doi: 10.2478/raon-2022-0036
- Almasarweh S, Sudah M, Okuma H, Joukainen S, Vanninen R, Masarwah A. Specimen tomosynthesis provides no additional value to specimen ultrasound in ultrasound-visible malignant breast lesions. Scand J Surg 2024; 113: 237-45. doi: 10.1177/14574969241233435
- Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ. Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1736-47. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr304
- American College of Radiology, D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, eds. ACR BI-RADS Atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ; Mammography, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring, Data Dictionary. 5th edition. ACR, American College of Radiology; 2013.
- Udovicic M, Bazdaric K, Bilic-Zulle L, Petrovecki M. What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? Biochem Med. 2007: 17: 10-15. doi: 10.11613/BM.2007.002
- Dalberg K, Azavedo E, Svane G, Sandelin K. Mammographic features, predictors of early ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences? Eur J Surg Oncol 1996; 22: 483-90. doi: 10.1016/S0748-7983(96)92882-6
- Rong XC, Kang YH, Shi GF, Ren JL, Liu YH, Li ZG, et al. The use of mammography-based radiomics nomograms for the preoperative prediction of the histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149: 11635-45. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05001-9
- Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Wells CA. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 40-4. doi: 10.1053/crad.1999.0333
- Tabar L, Tony Chen HH, Amy Yen MF, Tot T, Tung TH, Chen LS, et al. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 101: 1745-59. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20582
- Landercasper J, Borgert AJ, Fayanju OM, Cody H 3rd, Feldman S, Greenberg C, et al. Factors associated with reoperation in breast-conserving surgery for cancer: A prospective study of American Society of Breast Surgeon members. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26: 3321-36. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07547-w
- McEvoy MP, Landercasper J, Naik HR, Feldman S. Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic. Gland Surg 2018; 7: 536-53. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.11.03
- Niinikoski L, Leidenius MHK, Vaara P, Voynov A, Heikkilä P, Mattson J, et al. Resection margins and local recurrences in breast cancer: Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45: 976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.010
- Lepomäki M, Karhunen-Enckell U, Tuominen J, Kronqvist P, Oksala N, Murtola T, et al. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125: 577-88. doi: 10.1002/jso.26749
- Joukainen S, Laaksonen E, Vanninen R, Kaarela O, Sudah M. Dual-layer rotation: A versatile therapeutic mammoplasty technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29: 6716-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11977-4
- Sturesdotter L, Sandsveden M, Johnson K, Larsson AM, Zackrisson S, Sartor H. Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtype. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 20814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77053-7
- Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ, Ellis IO, Cornford E. Is Mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 1377-80. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0725
- Ciatto S, Morrone D, Catarzi S, Bonardi R. Breast cancer: reliability of mammographic appearance as a predictor of hormone receptor status. Radiology 1992; 182: 805-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311118