Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mammographically detected spicules associated with malignant breast tumors frequently harbor additional tumor foci Cover

Mammographically detected spicules associated with malignant breast tumors frequently harbor additional tumor foci

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

A 14 mm spiculated invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) excised en bloc with spiculations. A tomosynthesis specimen radiogram at the level of the tumor documents the total removal of both the guidewire localized tumor (A; arrow) and the associated spicules (arrowheads). The histopathological analysis (B, H&E; 10 × magnification) showed that all the spicules contained additional tumors: the spicule shown in the red box contained IDC (100 × magnification); one spicule contained ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (blue box, 150 × magnification); other spicules contained both DCIS and IDC in green (100 × magnification) and yellow (150 × magnification) boxes.
A 14 mm spiculated invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) excised en bloc with spiculations. A tomosynthesis specimen radiogram at the level of the tumor documents the total removal of both the guidewire localized tumor (A; arrow) and the associated spicules (arrowheads). The histopathological analysis (B, H&E; 10 × magnification) showed that all the spicules contained additional tumors: the spicule shown in the red box contained IDC (100 × magnification); one spicule contained ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (blue box, 150 × magnification); other spicules contained both DCIS and IDC in green (100 × magnification) and yellow (150 × magnification) boxes.

Figure 2.

A mammogram of a nonpalpable, spiculated 12 mm invasive ductal carcinoma: a craniocaudal-tomosynthesis view (A) demonstrates spiculations better than full-field digital mammography in mediolateral-projection (B). After breast conserving surgery, a more superficial axial section (C) the invasive additional cancer extends 2.2 mm from the tumor’s margin. In the deeper section (D) additional invasive cancer cells are visible further in the spicule extending up to 2.7 mm from the tumor’s margin highlighting that analyzing only one section of a spicule will underestimate the extent of the disease. (E) A magnified view of the base of the spicule.
A mammogram of a nonpalpable, spiculated 12 mm invasive ductal carcinoma: a craniocaudal-tomosynthesis view (A) demonstrates spiculations better than full-field digital mammography in mediolateral-projection (B). After breast conserving surgery, a more superficial axial section (C) the invasive additional cancer extends 2.2 mm from the tumor’s margin. In the deeper section (D) additional invasive cancer cells are visible further in the spicule extending up to 2.7 mm from the tumor’s margin highlighting that analyzing only one section of a spicule will underestimate the extent of the disease. (E) A magnified view of the base of the spicule.

Figure 3.

(A) A mediolateraloblique spot magnification view of a 13 mm mainly circumscribed, mixed papillary and invasive ductal carcinoma (arrows) with a few spicules (arrowheads). The histopathologal analysis (B) showed a single solid spicule with multiple foci, likely representing a continuum of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (arrows) extending as far as 10.1 mm from the tumor’s edge and close to the resection margin.
(A) A mediolateraloblique spot magnification view of a 13 mm mainly circumscribed, mixed papillary and invasive ductal carcinoma (arrows) with a few spicules (arrowheads). The histopathologal analysis (B) showed a single solid spicule with multiple foci, likely representing a continuum of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (arrows) extending as far as 10.1 mm from the tumor’s edge and close to the resection margin.

Presence and distribution of spicules in the pre- and intraoperative images

Pre (%)Intra (%)P value (r*)
Number of spicules12.2 ± 6.313.0 ± 6.2< 0.001 (0.577)
Maximum length of spicules (mm)7.3 ± 5.09.5 ± 5.1< 0.001 (0.564)
Presence of spicules 0.648
 Yes97 (59.9)100 (61.7)
 No65 (40.1)62 (38.3)
Radial distribution of spicules 0.192
 < 25 %8 (8.2)7 (7.0)
 25–50 %23 (23.7)22 (22.0)
 50–75 %21 (21.6)18 (18.0)
 75–100 %45 (46.4)53 (53.0)

Characteristics of the patients and tumors

Number (%)
Patients156
Lesions162
Mean age, years (range)63.0 ± 10.2 (33–95)
Histology
 Invasive ductal125 (77.2)
 Invasive lobular29 (17.9)
 Others*8 (4.9)
Size of tumor, mm (range)16.2 ± 10.0 (2–60)
Grade
 151 (31.5)
 287 (53.7)
 324 (14.8)
T-stage
 T1122 (75.3)
 T238 (23.5)
 T32 (1.2)
N-stage
 N0117 (72.2)
 N139 (24.1)
 N25 (3.1)
 N31 (0.6)
ER status
 Positive149 (92.0)
 Negative13 (8.0)
PR status
 Positive144 (88.9)
 Negative18 (11.1)
HER-2 status
 Positive11 (6.8)
 Negative151 (93.2)
Ki-67 status
 Lower (≤ 14 %)60 (37.0)
 Higher (> 14 %)101 (62.3)
 Data missing1 (0.6)

Distribution of tumor subtypes and presence of additional tumor material in spicules in relation to spiculated mass

Spiculated(%)Non-spiculated(%)P value
Subtype
 Luminal A2841.23234.00.016
 Luminal B3957.44648.9
 HER-2 enriched11.588.5
 Basal0088.5
Presence of additional tumor in spicules
 Yes4667.64648.90.018
 No2232.44851.1

Mammographic features of the tumors and the lesion descriptions according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 5th

Breast compositionNumber (%)
 A49 (30.2)
 B84 (51.9)
 C26 (16.0)
 D3 (1.9)
Findings
 Mass128 (79.0)
 Calcification25 (15.4)
 Architectural distortion6 (3.7)
 Asymmetry2 (1.2)
 Invisible on mammography1 (0.6)
Mass shape
 Oval14 (10.9)
 Round61 (47.7)
 Irregular53 (41.4)
Mass margin
 Circumscribed3 (2.3)
 Obscured3 (2.3)
 Microlobulated31 (24.2)
 Indistinct23 (18.0)
 Spiculated68 (53.1)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0041 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 168 - 175
Submitted on: Dec 19, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 7, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 21, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Heli Tuomainen, Mazen Sudah, Sarianna Joukainen, Vesa Kärjä, Amro Masarwah, Otto Jokelainen, Hidemi Okuma, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.