FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 3.
![Forest plot showing the pooled sensitivities of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in bone metastasis of breast cancer patients on a patient-based analysis. The plot displays individual study estimates (squares) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) and the pooled sensitivity estimate (diamond) for both modalities. The size of the squares represents the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis.9,15,17,18,21,23,25](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647356844e662f30ba53ab9b/j_raon-2023-0037_fig_003.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKBXMRUHLN%2F20260305%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260305T082627Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAAaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQDFYxdKUAYc9NlRI1hb%2FiofOc%2BSDL59IJvJDh8nk7S4xAIhAOWo%2FGEPMCEnypust1PwSVcZPNilT7Cz6PHc2zdmBxLJKsQFCMn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEQAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgwnJ45zC3nwUXeNTTMqmAVbXdIDeuXm2UULB6coMp5lFKLlRq2dY2FU045sFc%2BfkmeIVoeOixWGQALh2xYPB1C96eSG3eMu99hEmbtnBirURid4O0hjlGR2X9H1xGVqqYpTU3kt%2B6cqiWS4Pb4onYYvYP0qqFs7YJecHHHt0AwEZC1Cv0Jsz9PY4TyPovsiH8cJOVu1pxndTjqyrXby%2FPckz0euxbQQwujnb40WFEDhkCVd2cBAZtGLCT%2BHj0JtUmBdwpEujzBRxQ2X%2FBGPza0D%2BbSDYr94JmREGZOZWvdmCDP0gMBaXW9rK6%2FPIXxEGbTlQGavVFt3qZX35T3tStHxMr%2FDkw4szlYKRC7dgtmtZHKC%2F%2B%2FZk8VQsIsGcOk6ZSoBeFuuezNUuSxrhZwpo2XbRxdHt%2FDkWijhDoCkHdl48Smp%2F00XbDvGLoskQM43bQcvDo0BcSPQKBJTjXWd5qs50rdSCtgFIn%2FvkJUB3r8x%2BvL6kify%2BWlOrz%2FXbkrYmNgB6jLx0r%2FYvZOLUHqXOh2iFLMgNwg4L2xW9l5vudXbHd7f7kaJIjTftf6pSGM%2BeL9SnNzAdhGxXTP%2FWr08bMwIwjfNBTuEl9xmD8qZMAGCn3VW1ULMx%2FXSMBvkDccXVV3mMXwJ5UFEX2WdY5862bwjQIy7KcCsP17m4pp1dEuRTRwlalzspGowrqBtnNdbGHeOEmW%2Bg%2FaNgFCrIblIyUzsADW%2FbT8eTNDsR3qx486SZ4AhUvZkrFLPwZTiNL%2F6tfoPupbG4jNWs7pUBIYFcFiiy5eo4hv%2FuVkHo2iX6TEi%2BfwEt5rrLbw9LitPIvlfgeUDLwXoScXGT%2FPP0HpISmbs2QuIGofshazYirb9UFXg5VUzwbyeproz0rEw7MPvirwK%2F6AG045xMPbfpM0GOrABnBz0Z8ImOHe2NFSeIciNlUXuX%2BAtwWbqHdtJ0WSQq0pILmdTyaH98oZ35%2BIliDrR5YV%2BsgV%2FQD6ehoDMyxLuKOXqjs1gsyX6O1qk%2BiPqITLnxRVUUs7dE9WkQGrI9dlSui3MfFjEJyyZSTH%2BzM%2B88Ljy3SLW4m01pkAC6eMt2pGkB8ZSODvVh1my5Foli6LnAye%2BlWL8J5Zj6o%2FqrSBA%2BoeRQhr23tchaxVn%2B4Ig8Dw%3D&X-Amz-Signature=94044cf50b19986e9e8ad6b3e727a318c3a00d21e0adb5e2f53a778d597ca8b0&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
FIGURE 4.
![Forest plot showing the pooled sensitivities of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in bone metastasis of breast cancer patients on a lesion-based analysis. The plot displays individual study estimates (squares) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) and the pooled sensitivity estimate (diamond) for both modalities. The size of the squares represents the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis.9,10,11,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,27](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647356844e662f30ba53ab9b/j_raon-2023-0037_fig_004.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKBXMRUHLN%2F20260305%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260305T082627Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAAaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQDFYxdKUAYc9NlRI1hb%2FiofOc%2BSDL59IJvJDh8nk7S4xAIhAOWo%2FGEPMCEnypust1PwSVcZPNilT7Cz6PHc2zdmBxLJKsQFCMn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEQAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgwnJ45zC3nwUXeNTTMqmAVbXdIDeuXm2UULB6coMp5lFKLlRq2dY2FU045sFc%2BfkmeIVoeOixWGQALh2xYPB1C96eSG3eMu99hEmbtnBirURid4O0hjlGR2X9H1xGVqqYpTU3kt%2B6cqiWS4Pb4onYYvYP0qqFs7YJecHHHt0AwEZC1Cv0Jsz9PY4TyPovsiH8cJOVu1pxndTjqyrXby%2FPckz0euxbQQwujnb40WFEDhkCVd2cBAZtGLCT%2BHj0JtUmBdwpEujzBRxQ2X%2FBGPza0D%2BbSDYr94JmREGZOZWvdmCDP0gMBaXW9rK6%2FPIXxEGbTlQGavVFt3qZX35T3tStHxMr%2FDkw4szlYKRC7dgtmtZHKC%2F%2B%2FZk8VQsIsGcOk6ZSoBeFuuezNUuSxrhZwpo2XbRxdHt%2FDkWijhDoCkHdl48Smp%2F00XbDvGLoskQM43bQcvDo0BcSPQKBJTjXWd5qs50rdSCtgFIn%2FvkJUB3r8x%2BvL6kify%2BWlOrz%2FXbkrYmNgB6jLx0r%2FYvZOLUHqXOh2iFLMgNwg4L2xW9l5vudXbHd7f7kaJIjTftf6pSGM%2BeL9SnNzAdhGxXTP%2FWr08bMwIwjfNBTuEl9xmD8qZMAGCn3VW1ULMx%2FXSMBvkDccXVV3mMXwJ5UFEX2WdY5862bwjQIy7KcCsP17m4pp1dEuRTRwlalzspGowrqBtnNdbGHeOEmW%2Bg%2FaNgFCrIblIyUzsADW%2FbT8eTNDsR3qx486SZ4AhUvZkrFLPwZTiNL%2F6tfoPupbG4jNWs7pUBIYFcFiiy5eo4hv%2FuVkHo2iX6TEi%2BfwEt5rrLbw9LitPIvlfgeUDLwXoScXGT%2FPP0HpISmbs2QuIGofshazYirb9UFXg5VUzwbyeproz0rEw7MPvirwK%2F6AG045xMPbfpM0GOrABnBz0Z8ImOHe2NFSeIciNlUXuX%2BAtwWbqHdtJ0WSQq0pILmdTyaH98oZ35%2BIliDrR5YV%2BsgV%2FQD6ehoDMyxLuKOXqjs1gsyX6O1qk%2BiPqITLnxRVUUs7dE9WkQGrI9dlSui3MfFjEJyyZSTH%2BzM%2B88Ljy3SLW4m01pkAC6eMt2pGkB8ZSODvVh1my5Foli6LnAye%2BlWL8J5Zj6o%2FqrSBA%2BoeRQhr23tchaxVn%2B4Ig8Dw%3D&X-Amz-Signature=94fce1eee383274b4d864b7d554bf66da4a36f927b406ed69a2cffebc7830d4a&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
FIGURE 5.
![Forest plot showing the pooled specificities of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in bone metastasis of breast cancer patients on a patient-based analysis. The plot displays individual study estimates (squares) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) and the pooled specificity estimate (diamond) for both modalities. The size of the squares represents the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis.9,15,17,18,21,23,25](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647356844e662f30ba53ab9b/j_raon-2023-0037_fig_005.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKBXMRUHLN%2F20260305%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260305T082627Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAAaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQDFYxdKUAYc9NlRI1hb%2FiofOc%2BSDL59IJvJDh8nk7S4xAIhAOWo%2FGEPMCEnypust1PwSVcZPNilT7Cz6PHc2zdmBxLJKsQFCMn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEQAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgwnJ45zC3nwUXeNTTMqmAVbXdIDeuXm2UULB6coMp5lFKLlRq2dY2FU045sFc%2BfkmeIVoeOixWGQALh2xYPB1C96eSG3eMu99hEmbtnBirURid4O0hjlGR2X9H1xGVqqYpTU3kt%2B6cqiWS4Pb4onYYvYP0qqFs7YJecHHHt0AwEZC1Cv0Jsz9PY4TyPovsiH8cJOVu1pxndTjqyrXby%2FPckz0euxbQQwujnb40WFEDhkCVd2cBAZtGLCT%2BHj0JtUmBdwpEujzBRxQ2X%2FBGPza0D%2BbSDYr94JmREGZOZWvdmCDP0gMBaXW9rK6%2FPIXxEGbTlQGavVFt3qZX35T3tStHxMr%2FDkw4szlYKRC7dgtmtZHKC%2F%2B%2FZk8VQsIsGcOk6ZSoBeFuuezNUuSxrhZwpo2XbRxdHt%2FDkWijhDoCkHdl48Smp%2F00XbDvGLoskQM43bQcvDo0BcSPQKBJTjXWd5qs50rdSCtgFIn%2FvkJUB3r8x%2BvL6kify%2BWlOrz%2FXbkrYmNgB6jLx0r%2FYvZOLUHqXOh2iFLMgNwg4L2xW9l5vudXbHd7f7kaJIjTftf6pSGM%2BeL9SnNzAdhGxXTP%2FWr08bMwIwjfNBTuEl9xmD8qZMAGCn3VW1ULMx%2FXSMBvkDccXVV3mMXwJ5UFEX2WdY5862bwjQIy7KcCsP17m4pp1dEuRTRwlalzspGowrqBtnNdbGHeOEmW%2Bg%2FaNgFCrIblIyUzsADW%2FbT8eTNDsR3qx486SZ4AhUvZkrFLPwZTiNL%2F6tfoPupbG4jNWs7pUBIYFcFiiy5eo4hv%2FuVkHo2iX6TEi%2BfwEt5rrLbw9LitPIvlfgeUDLwXoScXGT%2FPP0HpISmbs2QuIGofshazYirb9UFXg5VUzwbyeproz0rEw7MPvirwK%2F6AG045xMPbfpM0GOrABnBz0Z8ImOHe2NFSeIciNlUXuX%2BAtwWbqHdtJ0WSQq0pILmdTyaH98oZ35%2BIliDrR5YV%2BsgV%2FQD6ehoDMyxLuKOXqjs1gsyX6O1qk%2BiPqITLnxRVUUs7dE9WkQGrI9dlSui3MfFjEJyyZSTH%2BzM%2B88Ljy3SLW4m01pkAC6eMt2pGkB8ZSODvVh1my5Foli6LnAye%2BlWL8J5Zj6o%2FqrSBA%2BoeRQhr23tchaxVn%2B4Ig8Dw%3D&X-Amz-Signature=b0c4389a3f48d214a71b675746aec5cf7c3c1f9a17b15acceec874a6a60c0ed3&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
FIGURE 6.
![Forest plot showing the pooled specificities of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in bone metastasis of breast cancer patients on a lesion-based analysis. The plot displays individual study estimates (squares) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) and the pooled specificity estimate (diamond) for both modalities. The size of the squares represents the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis.9,18,19,20,21,23,25,26,27](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647356844e662f30ba53ab9b/j_raon-2023-0037_fig_006.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKBXMRUHLN%2F20260305%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260305T082627Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAAaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQDFYxdKUAYc9NlRI1hb%2FiofOc%2BSDL59IJvJDh8nk7S4xAIhAOWo%2FGEPMCEnypust1PwSVcZPNilT7Cz6PHc2zdmBxLJKsQFCMn%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEQAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgwnJ45zC3nwUXeNTTMqmAVbXdIDeuXm2UULB6coMp5lFKLlRq2dY2FU045sFc%2BfkmeIVoeOixWGQALh2xYPB1C96eSG3eMu99hEmbtnBirURid4O0hjlGR2X9H1xGVqqYpTU3kt%2B6cqiWS4Pb4onYYvYP0qqFs7YJecHHHt0AwEZC1Cv0Jsz9PY4TyPovsiH8cJOVu1pxndTjqyrXby%2FPckz0euxbQQwujnb40WFEDhkCVd2cBAZtGLCT%2BHj0JtUmBdwpEujzBRxQ2X%2FBGPza0D%2BbSDYr94JmREGZOZWvdmCDP0gMBaXW9rK6%2FPIXxEGbTlQGavVFt3qZX35T3tStHxMr%2FDkw4szlYKRC7dgtmtZHKC%2F%2B%2FZk8VQsIsGcOk6ZSoBeFuuezNUuSxrhZwpo2XbRxdHt%2FDkWijhDoCkHdl48Smp%2F00XbDvGLoskQM43bQcvDo0BcSPQKBJTjXWd5qs50rdSCtgFIn%2FvkJUB3r8x%2BvL6kify%2BWlOrz%2FXbkrYmNgB6jLx0r%2FYvZOLUHqXOh2iFLMgNwg4L2xW9l5vudXbHd7f7kaJIjTftf6pSGM%2BeL9SnNzAdhGxXTP%2FWr08bMwIwjfNBTuEl9xmD8qZMAGCn3VW1ULMx%2FXSMBvkDccXVV3mMXwJ5UFEX2WdY5862bwjQIy7KcCsP17m4pp1dEuRTRwlalzspGowrqBtnNdbGHeOEmW%2Bg%2FaNgFCrIblIyUzsADW%2FbT8eTNDsR3qx486SZ4AhUvZkrFLPwZTiNL%2F6tfoPupbG4jNWs7pUBIYFcFiiy5eo4hv%2FuVkHo2iX6TEi%2BfwEt5rrLbw9LitPIvlfgeUDLwXoScXGT%2FPP0HpISmbs2QuIGofshazYirb9UFXg5VUzwbyeproz0rEw7MPvirwK%2F6AG045xMPbfpM0GOrABnBz0Z8ImOHe2NFSeIciNlUXuX%2BAtwWbqHdtJ0WSQq0pILmdTyaH98oZ35%2BIliDrR5YV%2BsgV%2FQD6ehoDMyxLuKOXqjs1gsyX6O1qk%2BiPqITLnxRVUUs7dE9WkQGrI9dlSui3MfFjEJyyZSTH%2BzM%2B88Ljy3SLW4m01pkAC6eMt2pGkB8ZSODvVh1my5Foli6LnAye%2BlWL8J5Zj6o%2FqrSBA%2BoeRQhr23tchaxVn%2B4Ig8Dw%3D&X-Amz-Signature=d80ef9bae5131dbfaf85ffd50bf9ec91b20cf08a608b74711b7a58e0d51c811b&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Study and patient characteristics of the included studies for [18F]FDG PET/CT
| Author | Year | Type of imaging test | Study characteristics | Patient characteristics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | Study design | Analysis | Reference standard | No. of patients | Clinical indication | Mean/Median age | Previous treatment | |||
| Catalano et al.15 | 2015 | PET/CT | Italy | Retro | PB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 109 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (58.08 ± 10.7) | Surgery |
| Melsaether et al.10 | 2016 | PET/CT | USA | Pro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 51 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean(range): 56 (32–76) | Chemotherapy |
| Botsikas et al.9 | 2018 | PET/CT | Switzerland | Pro | PB and LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 80 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (48 ± 12.9) | NA |
| Sawicki et al.11 | 2016 | PET/CT | Germany | Pro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 21 | Post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (59.4 ±11.5) | NA |
| Balci et al.17 | 2012 | PET/CT | Turkey | Retro | PB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 162 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean: 50.6 | Surgery |
| Hahn et al.18 | 2011 | PET/CT | Germany | Retro | PB and LB | Follow-up imaging | 29 | Initial stage | Mean (range): 57.5 (35–78) | NA |
| Manohar et al.19 | 2012 | PET/CT | India | Retro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 111 | Post-treatment stage | Mean(range): 52 (22–80) | Surgery |
| Niikura et al.25 | 2011 | PET/CT | Japan | Retro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 225 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean: 53.4 | Chemotherapy or endocrine therapy |
| Riegger et al.22 | 2012 | PET/CT | Germany | Retro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 106 | Initial stage | Mean ± SD: (57 ± 13) | NA |
| Rager et al.23 | 2018 | PET/CT | Switzerland | Retro | PB and LB | Follow-up imaging | 25 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Median(range): 5 (38–82) | NA |
| Demir et al.20 | 2014 | PET/CT | Turkey | Retro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 50 | Post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (53.9 ± 12.3) | NA |
| Hansen et al.24 | 2015 | PET/CT | Denmark | Pro | LB | Pathology | 18 | Post-treatment stage | Mean(range): 61.5 (38–76) | Surgery |
| Niikura et al.21 | 2016 | PET/CT | Japan | Pro | PB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 28 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Median(range): 59 (31–76) | Surgery |
| Shawky et al.26 | 2016 | PET/CT | Egypt | Pro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 30 | Post-treatment stage | Mean(range): 53.5 (33–73) | Surgery or Chemotherapy or radiotherapy |
| Teke et al.27 | 2020 | PET/CT | Turkey | Retro | LB | Follow-up imaging | 62 | Initial stage | Median(range): 44.5 (8–81) | NO |
Study and patient characteristics of the included studies for [18F]FDG PET/MRI
| Author | Year | Type of imaging test | Study characteristics | Patient characteristics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | Study design | Analysis | Reference standard | No. of patients | Clinical indication | Mean/Median age | Previous treatment | |||
| Catalano et al.15 | 2015 | PET/MRI | Italy | Retro | PB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 109 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (58.08 ± 10.7) | Surgery |
| Bruckmann et al.21 | 2021 | PET/MRI | Germany | Pro | PB and LB | Pathology | 154 | Post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (53.8±11.9) | NO |
| Melsaether et al.10 | 2016 | PET/MRI | USA | Pro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 51 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean(range): 56(32–76) | Chemotherapy |
| Botsikas et al.9 | 2018 | PET/MRI | Switzerland | Pro | PB and LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 80 | Initial stage and post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (48 ± 12.9) | NA |
| Sawicki et al.11 | 2016 | PET/MRI | Germany | Pro | LB | Pathology and/or follow-up imaging | 21 | Post-treatment stage | Mean ± SD: (59.4 ± 11.5) | NA |