Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions
By:
References
- Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M,Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152
- Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1227-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989
- Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 717-30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5
- Landercasper J, Borgert AJ, Fayanju OM, Cody H 3rd, Feldman S, Greenberg C, et al. Factors associated with reoperation in breast-conserving surgery for cancer: a prospective study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26: 3321-36. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07547-w
- McEvoy MP, Landercasper J, Naik HR, Feldman S. Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic. Gland Surg 2018; 7: 536-53. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.11.03
- Mall S, Lewis S, Brennan P, Noakes J, Mello-Thoms C. The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in the breast assessment clinic: a review. J Med Radiat Sci 2017; 64: 203-211. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.230
- Polat YD, Taşkın F, Çildağ MB, Tanyeri A, Soyder A, Ergin F. The role of tomosynthesis in intraoperative specimen evaluation. Breast J 2018; 24: 992-6. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13070
- Urano M, Shiraki N, Kawai T, Goto T, Endo Y, Yoshimoto N, et al. Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer 2016; 23: 706-11. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0628-5
- Romanucci G, Mercogliano S, Carucci E, Cina A, Zantedeschi E, Caneva A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography. Radiol Med 2021; 126: 768-773. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01337-9
- Schulz-Wendtland R, Dilbat G, Bani M, Fasching PA, Lux MP, Wenkel E, et al. Full field digital mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS technology versus tomosynthesis (DBT) − which system increases the quality of intraoperative imaging? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012; 72: 532-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1314942
- Garlaschi A, Fregatti P, Oddone C, Friedman D, Houssami N, Calabrese M, et al. Intraoperative digital breast tomosynthesis using a dedicated device is more accurate than standard intraoperative mammography for identifying positive margins. Clin Radiol 2019; 74: 974.e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.004
- Partain N, Calvo C, Mokdad A, Colton A, Pouns K, Clifford E, et al. Differences in re-excision rates for breast-conserving surgery using intraoperative 2D versus 3D tomosynthesis specimen radiograph. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27: 4767-76. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08877-w
- Park KU, Kuerer HM, Rauch GM, Leung JWT, Sahin AA, Wei W, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26: 1720-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07226-w
- Wang Y, Ebuoma L, Saksena M, Liu B, Specht M, Rafferty E. Clinical evaluation of a mobile digital specimen radiography system for intraoperative specimen verification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 457-62. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11408
- Miller CL, Coopey SB, Rafferty E, Gadd M, Smith BL, Specht MC. Comparison of intra-operative specimen mammography to standard specimen mammography for excision of non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 155: 513-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3700-8
- Mariscotti G, Durando M, Pavan LJ, Tagliafico A, Campanino PP, Castellano I, et al. Intraoperative breast specimen assessment in breast conserving surgery: comparison between standard mammography imaging and a remote radiological system. Br J Radiol 2020; 93: 20190785. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190785
- Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1296-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
- Joukainen S, Okuma H, Kaarela O, Laaksonen E, Kärjä V, Vanninen R, et al. Can supine breast magnetic resonance imaging help hit the target in extreme oncoplastic surgery? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47: 2788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.027
- Amer HA, Schmitzberger F, Ingold-Heppner B, Kussmaul J, El Tohamy MF, Tantawy HI, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography − which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography? Eur J Radiol 2017; 93: 258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.041
- Chen JY, Huang YJ, Zhang LL, Yang CQ, Wang K. Comparison of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and breast-conserving surgery alone: a meta-analysis. J Breast Cancer 2018; 21: 321-29. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e36
- Laws A, Brar MS, Bouchard-Fortier A, Leong B, Quan ML. Intraoperative margin assessment in wire-localized breast-conserving surgery for invasive cancer: a population-level comparison of techniques. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 3290-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5401-2
- St John ER, Al-Khudairi R, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Takats Z, Hadjiminas DJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative techniques for margin assessment in breast cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 300-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001897
- Versteegden DPA, Keizer LGG, Schlooz-Vries MS, Duijm LEM, Wauters CAP, Strobbe LJA. Performance characteristics of specimen radiography for margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166: 669-79. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4475-2
- Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, Sideris L, Rochard F, Delaloge S, et al. Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 789-96. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.04.017
- Britton PD, Sonoda LI, Yamamoto AK, Koo B, Soh E, Goud A. Breast surgical specimen radiographs: how reliable are they? Eur J Radiol 2011; 79: 245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.012
- Leung BST, Wan AYH, Au AKY, Lo SSW, Wong WWC, Khoo JLS. Can intra-operative specimen radiograph predict resection margin status for radio-guided occult lesion localisation lumpectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ presenting with microcalcifications? Hong Kong J Radiol 2015; 18: 11-21. doi: 10.12809/hkjr1414265
- Williams D, McCormack S. Intraoperative mammography for breast cancer surgery: a review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019. [cited 2022 Apr 15]. PMID: 31411841. Avilable at: https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31411841/
- Butler-Henderson K, Lee AH, Price RI, Waring K. Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: a systematic review. Breast 2014; 23: 112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.002
- Mario J, Venkataraman S, Fein-Zachary V, Knox M, Brook A, Slanetz P. Lumpectomy specimen radiography: does orientation or 3-dimensional tomosynthesis improve margin assessment? Can Assoc Radiol J 2019; 70: 282-91. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2019.03.005
Language: English
Page range: 461 - 470
Submitted on: May 23, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 6, 2022
Published on: Oct 13, 2022
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2022 Sa’ed Almasarweh, Mazen Sudah, Hidemi Okuma, Sarianna Joukainen, Vesa Kärjä, Ritva Vanninen, Amro Masarwah, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.