Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for older patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes of a phase I–II trial Cover

Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for older patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes of a phase I–II trial

Open Access
|Mar 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Consort diagram of the trial.
Consort diagram of the trial.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) progression-free survival (PFS), (B) biochemical failure free survival (BFFS), (C) prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS), and (D) overall survival (OS) in patients received hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT).
Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) progression-free survival (PFS), (B) biochemical failure free survival (BFFS), (C) prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS), and (D) overall survival (OS) in patients received hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT).

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) progression-free survival (PFS), (B) biochemical failure free survival (BFFS), (C) prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS), and (D) overall survival (OS) in patients with pelvic lymph nodes involvement (LNI) risk > 15% in Group-1 who had no elective pelvic node irradiation (blue line), and in Group-2 who had an irradiation of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions (F) (green line).
Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) progression-free survival (PFS), (B) biochemical failure free survival (BFFS), (C) prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS), and (D) overall survival (OS) in patients with pelvic lymph nodes involvement (LNI) risk > 15% in Group-1 who had no elective pelvic node irradiation (blue line), and in Group-2 who had an irradiation of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions (F) (green line).

Figure 4

Late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity-free survival in patients received hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT).
Late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity-free survival in patients received hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT).

Demographic characteristics of patients and baseline risk assessment

CharacteristicsFull analysis set
Group-1 (76.0 Gy/34 F, N = 33)Group-2 (71.6 Gy/28 F, N = 34)p-value
Age, y (mean ± SD)79.7 ± 3.977.3 ± 5.10.284
Median time of follow-up, y (range)8.9 (1.5–11.4)6.8 (2.6–8.4)0.002
AJCC T stage, no. (%) 0.121
   T1c/T1x1 (3.0)0
   T2a/T2b/T2c/T2x29 (87.9)27 (79.4)
   T3a/T3b/T3x3 (9.1)6 (17.6)
   T401 (2.9)
Risk stage, no. (%) 0.204
   low risk3 (9.1)1 (2.9)
   intermediate risk11 (33.3)10 (29.4)
   high risk15 (45.5)18 (53.0)
   very high risk4 (12.1)5 (14.7)
Gleason score, no. (%) 0.775
   5–612 (36.4)13 (38.2)
   710 (30.3)13 (38.2)
   8–98 (24.2)5 (14.7)
   unknown3 (9.1)3 (8.8)
Pre-treatment PSA, no. (%) 0.442
   < 10 ng/mL11 (33.3)7 (20.6)
   10–20 ng/mL8(24.2)8 (23.5)
   > 20 ng/mL14 (42.4)19 (55.9)
   Comorbidity
   Diabetes4 (12%)3 (8.8%)0.659
   Hypertension7 (21.2%)8 (23.5%)0.820
   Symptomatic haemorrhoids3 (9.1%)1 (2.9%)0.288
Intended androgen deprivation therapy 0.288
   LHRH plus short-term AA30 (90.9%)33 (97.1%)
   Other3 (9.1%)1 (2.9%)
Radiotherapy (mean ± SD) treatment time, w6.8 ± 0.45.8 ± 0.5< 0.001
Result by Roach formula, no. (%) 0.791
   > 15%23 (69.7)25 (73.5)
   ≤ 15%10 (30.3)9 (26.5)
Elective (%) lymph node irradiation, no.025 (73.5)

Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS, PFS

FactorUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis

HR95% CIp-valueHR95% CIp-value
OS
   HFRT regimens0.8460.083–2.2860.3261.6810.533–5.3050.375
   Age > 80y0.6310.170–2.0210.3980.5360.161–1.7860.310
   iPSA > 20ng/ml1.1510.088–8.0150.8801.0080.992–1.0250.303
   Gleason ≥ 80.8350.177–4.6700.9080.8850.252–3.1040.849
   T > 3b1.0620.219–14.0690.5962.9410.505–17.1370.230
   High and very high risk1.3400.072–13.7420.9960.8750.196–3.9040.861
   Roach > 15%0.7870.426–9.3050.3815.5810.623–49.9690.124
   RT time > 42 d0.8830.218–6.9490.8130.267-0.605
PFS
   HFRT regimens1.8430.347–9.7940.4731.659-0.198
   Age > 80y1.2240.371–4.0350.7400.517-0.472
   iPSA > 20ng/ml0.3310.023–4.8060.4180.277-0.598
   Gleason ≥ 80.7490.140–4.0010.7350.851-0.356
   T > 3b0.1190.010–1.3630.0870.1970.065–0.5940.004
   High and very high risk2.6390.135–51.7180.5230.169-0.681
   Roach > 15%0.6600.156–2.7960.8371.075-0.300
   RT time > 42 d0.8320.144–4.8070.3240.257-0.605

Survival analysis of PC patients according to the data obtained during the last follow-up

MeasuresEvents at 7 years
Total (n = 67)Group-1 (n = 33)Group-2 (n = 34)p-value

Full analysis set
   BF, no. (%)16 (23.9)9 (27.3)7 (20.6)0.521
   BCDF, no. (%)26 (38.8)15 (45.5)11 (32.4)0.271
   Overall deaths, no. (%)18 (26.9)12 (36.4)6 (17.6)0.164
Deaths of PC in overall death, no. (%)5 (27.8)3 (25.0)2 (33.3)0.638
   nPC deaths, no. (%)13 (72.2)9 (75.0)4 (66.7)0.213
   PFS, %71.668.674.80.591
   BFFS, %77.674.080.30.915
   PCSS, %91.989.993.80.605
   OS, %77.071.987.50.376

Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities after a median follow-up of 7_2 years

ToxicitySafety set
Group-1 (n = 32)Group-2 (n = 32)p-value
GU 0.127
   Grade 015 (46.9%)17 (53.1%)
   Grade 115 (46.9%)13 (40.6%)
   Grade 21 (3.1%)0
   Grade 3 or 41 (3.1%)2 (6.3%)
GI 0.554
   Grade 024 (75.0%)24 (75.0%)
   Grade 15 (15.6%)3 (9.4%)
   Grade 23 (9.4%)2 (6.2%)
   Grade 3 or 40 (0%)3 (9.4%)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 216 - 227
Submitted on: Aug 2, 2021
Accepted on: Feb 11, 2022
Published on: Mar 28, 2022
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2022 Di Cui, Lei Du, Wei Yu, Boning Cai, Lingling Meng, Jun Yang, Yanrong Luo, Jing Chen, Lin Ma, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.