Wolff D, Stieler F, Welzel G, Lorenz F, Abo-Madyan Y, Mai S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.011
Avkshtol V, Dong Y, Hayes SB, Hallman M, Price R, Sobczak M, et al. A comparison of robotic arm versus gantry linear accelerator stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Res Rep Urol 2016; 8: 145-58. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S58262
Seppälä J, Suilamo S, Tenhunen M, Sailas L, Virsunen H, Kaleva E, et al. Dosimetric comparison and evaluation of 4 stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017; 16: 238-45. doi: 10.1177/1533034616682156
MacDougall ND, Dean C, Muirhead R. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer: is rapidarc a better solution than cyberknife? Clin Oncol 2014; 26: 4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.08.008
Lin YW, Lin KH, Ho HW, Lin H, Lin L, Lee S, et al. Treatment plan comparison between stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer: non-isocentric CyberKnife versus isocentric RapidArc. Phys Med 2014; 30: 654-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.03.008
Quan EM, Li X, Li Y, Wang X, Kudchadker R, Johnsosn J, et al. A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83: 1169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.015
Elith CA, Dempsey SE, Warren-Forward HM. A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2013; 60: 84-92. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.22
McGarry CK, Butterworth KT, Trainor C, O’Sullivan JM, Prise KM, Hounsell AR. Temporal characterization and in vitro comparison of cell survival following the delivery of 3D-conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 2445-57. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/8/008
Kopp RW, Duff M, Catalfamo F, Shah D, Rajecki M, Ahmad K. VMAT vs. 7-Field-IMRT: assessing the dosimetric parameters of prostate cancer treatment with a 292-patient sample. Med Dosim 2011; 36: 365-72. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.09.004
Davidson MTM, Blake SJ, Batchelar DL, Cheung P, Mah K. Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and postoperative prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80: 1550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.024
Salimi M, Shirani K, Abi T, Nedaie H, Hassani H, Gharaati H, et al. Assessment and comparison of homogeneity and conformity indexes in step-and-shoot and compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) in prostate cancer. J Med Signals Sens 2017; 7: 102-7. PMID: 28553583
Varnava M, Sumida I, Mizuno H, Shiomi H, Suzuki O, Yoshioka Y, et al. A new plan quality objective function for determining optimal collimator combinations in prostate cancer treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife. PLoS ONE 2018; 13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208086
Scobioala S, Kittel C, Elsayad K, Kroeger K, Oertel M, Samhouri L, et al. A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1353-6
Ceylan C, Kucuk N, Bas Ayata H, Guden M, Engin K. Dosimetric and physical comparison of IMRT and CyberKnife plans in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010; 15: 181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.10.003
McGuinness CM, Gottschalk AR, Lessard E, Nakamura J, Pinnaduwage D, Pouliot J, et al. Investigating the clinical advantages of a robotic linac equipped with a multileaf collimator in the treatment of brain and prostate cancer patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16: 284-95. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5502
Park JI, Park JM, Kim J in, Park SY, Ye SJ. Gamma-index method sensitivity for gauging plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Phys Med 2015; 31: 1118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.005
Hussein M, Rowshanfarzad P, Ebert MA, Nisbet A, Clark CH. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109: 370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.048
Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, Moran J, Pawlicki T, Molineu A, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218. Med Phys 2018; 45: e53-83. doi: 10.1002/mp.12810
R Core Team - European Environment Agency. R software, version 4.0.3. [2020]. Available at https://github.com/tim-lebedkov/packages/releases/download/2020_10/r-4.0.3-R-4.0.3-win.exe
Hardcastle N, Tomé WA, Foo K, Miller A, Carolan M, Metcalfe P. Comparison of prostate IMRT and VMAT biologically optimised treatment plans. Med Dosimet 2011; 36: 292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.06.001
Gleeson I. A comparison of a moderately hypofractionated IMRT planning technique used in a randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trial with an in-house technique for localised prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25: 360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.010