Adnexal masses characterized on 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging – added value of diffusion techniques
References
- Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging, Atri M, Alabousi A, Reinhold C, Akin EA, Benson CB, Bhosale PR, et al. ACR Appropriateness CriteriaR clinically suspected adnexal mass, no acute symptoms. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16: S77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.011
- Sharma A, Apostolidou S, Burnell M, Campbell S, Habib M, Gentry-Maharaj A, et al. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012. 40: 338-44. doi: 10.1002/uog.12270
- Biggs WS, Marks ST. Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93: 676-81. PMID: 27175840
- Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Valentin L, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Testa AC, et al. Triaging women with ovarian masses for surgery: observational diagnostic study to compare RCOG guidelines with an International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group protocol. BJOG 2012; 119: 662-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03297.x
- Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, et al. Ovarian-adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e1919896. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19896
- Valentini AL, Gui B, Miccò M, Mingote MC, De Gaetano AM, Ninivaggi V, et al. Benign and suspicious ovarian masses-MR imaging criteria for characterization: Pictorial review. J Oncol 2012; 2012: 481806. doi: 10.1155/2012/481806
- Kataoka M, Kido A, Koyama T, Isoda H, Umeoka S, Tamai K, et al. MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 527-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20842
- Léautaud A, Marcus C, Ben Salem D, Bouché O, Graesslin O, Hoeffel C. Pelvic MRI at 3.0 Tesla. J Radiol 2009; 90: 277-86. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(09)72506-5
- Hussain SM, van den Bos IC, Oliveto JM, Martin DR. MR imaging of the female pelvis at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 537-44, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.01.008
- Thomassin-Naggara I, Balvay D, Rockall A, Carette MF, Ballester M, Darai E, et al. Added value of assessing adnexal masses with advanced MRI techniques. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 785206. doi: 10.1155/2015/785206
- Davarpanah AH, Kambadakone A, Holalkere NS, Guimaraes AR, Hahn PF, Lee SI. Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions. Abdom Radiol 2016; 41: 2466-75. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0909-2
- Dhanda S, Thakur M, Kerkar R, Jagmohan P. Diffusion-weighted imaging of gynecologic tumors: diagnostic pearls and potential pitfalls Radiographics 2014; 34: 1393-416. doi: 10.1148/rg.345130131
- Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2000; 20: 1445-70. doi: 10.1148/ radiographics.20.5.g00se101445
- El-Wekil A, Mohammad S Abdullah MS, El-Kholy SS. The role of MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Menoufia Med J 2017; 32: 106-11. doi: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_548_17
- Alt C, Bharwani N, Brunesch L, Danza FM, Derme M, El Sayed RF, et al. ESUR quick guide to female pelvis imaging 1.0. 2019: European Society of Urogenital Radiology. [cited 2020 May 15]. Available at: http://www.esur.org/fileadmin/content/2019/ESUR_2019_-_ESUR_Quick_Guide_to_Female_Pelvis_Imaging.pdf
- Koc Z, Erbay G, Ulusan S, Seydaoglu G, Aka-Bolat F. Optimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for characterization of benign and malignant gynecological lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35: 650-9. doi: 10.1002/ jmri.22871
- Foti PV, Attinà G, Spadola S, Caltabiano R, Farina R, Palmucci S, et al. MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging 2016; 7: 21-41. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0455-4
- Meinhold-Heerlein I, Fotopoulou C, Harter P, Kurzeder C, Mustea A, Wimberger P, et al. The new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293: 695-700. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4035-8
- Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 2001; 21: 475-90. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr09475
- Caruso PA, Marsh MR, Minkowitz S, Karten G. An intense clinicopathologic study of 305 teratomas of the ovary. Cancer 1971; 27: 343-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197102)27:2<;343::aid-cncr2820270215>3.0.co;2-b
- Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Nishie A, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 271-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20369
- Agostinho L, Horta M, Salvador JC, Cunha TM. Benign ovarian lesions with restricted diffusion. Radiol Bras 2019; 52: 106-11. doi: 10.1590/01003984.2018.0078
- Feuerlein S, Pauls S, Juchems MS, Stuber T, Hoffmann MH, Brambs HJ, et al. Pitfalls in abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging: how predictive is restricted water diffusion for malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1070-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2093
- Dunn DP, Kelsey NR, Lee KS, Smith MP, Mortele KJ. Non-oncologic applications of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the genitourinary system. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 1645-54. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0471-3
- Duarte AL, Dias JL, Cunha TM. Pitfalls of diffusion-weighted imaging of the female pelvis. Radiol Bras 2018; 51: 37-44. doi: 10.1590/01003984.2016.0208
- Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian tumors: differentiation of benign and malignant solid components of ovarian masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010; 34: 173-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181c2f0a2
- Moyle PL, Kataoka MY, Nakai A, Takahata A, Reinhold C, Sala E. Nonovarian cystic lesions of the pelvis. Radiographics 2010; 30: 921-38. doi: 10.1148/rg.304095706
- Kim MY, Rha SE, Oh SN, Jung SE, Lee YJ, Kim YS, et al. MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 2009; 29: 495-507. doi: 10.1148/rg.292085070
- Laurent PE, Thomassin-Piana J, Jalaguier-Coudray A. Mucin-producing tumors of the ovary: MR imaging appearance Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96: 1125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.11.034
- Marko J, Marko KI, Pachigolla SL, Crothers BA, Mattu R, Wolfman DJ. Mucinous neoplasms of the ovary: radiologic-pathologic correlation Radiographics 2019; 39: 982-97. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180221
- Vargas HA, Barrett T, Sala E. MRI of ovarian masses J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37: 265-81. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23721
- Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung JI, Hahn ST. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis Radiographics 2002; 22: 1305-25. doi: 10.1148/rg.226025033
- Cho SM, Byun JY, Rha SE, Jung SE, Park GS, Kim BK, et al. CT and MRI findings of cystadenofibromas of the ovary. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 798-804. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2060-z
- Tang YZ, Liyanage S, Narayanan P, Sahdev A, Sohaib A, Singh N, et al. The MRI features of histologically proven ovarian cystadenofibromas-an assessment of the morphological and enhancement patterns. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 48-56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2568-1
- Siegelman ES, Outwater EK. Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 5-18. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl455
- Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP Jr. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2001; 21: 193-216; questionnaire 288-94. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja14193
- Rockall A, Forstner R. Adnexal diseases. In: Hodler J, Kubik-Huch RA, von Schulthess GK, editors. Diseases of the abdomen and pelvis 2018-2021: diagnostic imaging. Cham (CH): IDKD Book; 2018. p. 75-84.
- Siegelman ES, Oliver ER. MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics 2012; 32: 1675-91. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125518
- Imaoka I, Wada A, Kaji Y, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Matsuo M, et al. Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1431-48. doi: 10.1148/rg.265045206
- Zhang H, Zhang GF, He ZY, Li ZY, Zhang GX. Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289: 357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2990-x
- Funt SA, Hricak H. Ovarian malignancies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14: 329-37. doi: 10.1097/00002142-200308000-00005
- Hussain SM, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES. MR imaging features of pelvic mucinous carcinomas. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 885-91. doi: 10.1007/s003300051029
- Hann LE, Lui DM, Shi W, Bach AM, Selland DL, Castiel M. Adnexal masses in women with breast cancer: US findings with clinical and histopathologic correlation Radiology 2000; 216: 242-7. doi: 10.1148/ radiology.216.1.r00jl15242
- Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Kim B, Chiowanich P, Blasbalg R, Kilger A. Ovarian Brenner tumors: MR imaging characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 1147-53. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00136-2
- Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. Characterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 1997; 38: 572-7. doi: 10.1080/02841859709174389
- Bent CL, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Singh N, Sohaib SA, Reznek RH. MRI appearances of borderline ovarian tumours Clin Radiol 2009; 64: 430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.09.011
- deSouza NM, O’Neill R, McIndoe GA, Dina R, Soutter WP. Borderline tumors of the ovary: CT and MRI features and tumor markers in differentiation from stage I disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 999-1003. doi: 10.2214/ ajr.184.3.01840999
- Maggino T, Gadducci A, D’Addario V, Pecorelli S, Lissoni A, Stella M, et al., Prospective multicenter study on CA 125 in postmenopausal pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54: 117-23. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1179
- Zhang H, Zhang GF, He ZY, Li ZY, Zhu M, Zhang GX. Evaluation of primary ad-nexal masses by 3T MRI: categorization with conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Ovarian Res 2012; 5: 33. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-5-33
Language: English
Page range: 419 - 428
Submitted on: Jun 19, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 14, 2020
Published on: Oct 21, 2020
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Julia Dimova, Dora Zlatareva, Rumiana Bakalova, Ichio Aoki, George Hadjidekov, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.