Experimental validation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning system in bone density equivalent media
By:
References
- Andreo P, Cramb J, Fraass BA, Ionescu-Farca F, Izewska J, Levin V, et al. Technical report series No. 430: commissioning and quality assurance of computerised planning system for radiation treatment of cancer. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004.
- Brunckhorst E, Gershkevitsh E, Ibbott G, Korf G, Miller D, Schmidt R, et al. IAEA-TECDOC-1583 Commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: testing for typical external beam treatment techniques. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2008.
- Kry SF, Alvarez P, Molineu A, Amador C, Galvin J, Followill DS, et al. Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the radiological Physics Center’s anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85: 95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.039
- The Netherlands Commission of Radiation Dosimetry. Code of practice for the quality assurance and control for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Delft, Netherlands; 2013.
- Smilowitz JB, Das IJ, Feygelman V, Fraass BA, Kry SF, Marshall IR, et al. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations - megavoltage photon and electron beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16: 14-34. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768
- Van Dyk J, Battista J. Has the use of computers in radiation therapy improved the accuracy in radiation dose delivery? J Phys Conf Ser 2014; 489: 012098. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012098
- Fogliata A, Cozzi L. Dose calculation algorithm accuracy for small fields in non-homogeneous media: the lung SBRT case. Phys Med 2017; 44: 157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.104
- Reynaert N, Crop F, Sterpin E. On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 5: 26-30. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.004
- Andreo P. Dose to ‘water-like’ media or dose to tissue in MV photons radiotherapy treatment planning: still a matter of debate. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60: 309-37. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/309
- Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, DeMarco JJ, Ezzell G, Faddegonet BA, et al. Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys 2007; 34: 4818-53. doi: 10.1118/1.2795842
- Liu HH, Keal P. Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. (Point/Counterpoint), Med Phys 2002; 29: 922-4. doi. 10.1118/1.1473137
- Ma C-M, Li J, Dose specification for radiation therapy: dose to water or dose to medium? Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 3073-89. doi: 10.1088/00319155/56/10/012
- Reynaert N, Van der Marck S, Schaart D, Van der Zee W, Van VlietVroegindeweij C, Tomsej M, et al. Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams. Radiat Phys Chem 2007; 76: 643-86. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015
- Dogan N, Siebers JV, Keall PJ. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 4967-80. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/19/015
- Walters BRB, Kramer R, Kawrakow I. Dose to medium versus dose to water as an estimator of dose to sensitive skeletal tissue. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 4535-46. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/S08
- Sterpin E. Potential pitfalls of the PTV concept in dose-to-medium planning optimization. Phys Med 2016; 32: 1103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.08.009
- Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Nahum AE. Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations. Phys Med Biol 2000 45: 983-95. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313
- Abratt R, Aguirre F, Andreo P, Coffey M, Drew J, El Gueddari B, et al. IAEA Comprehensive audits of radiotherapy practices: a tool for quality improvement quality assurance team for radiation oncology-QUATRO. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2007.
- Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta J, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee. Med Phys 2003; 30: 2089-115. doi: 10.1118/1.1591194
- Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys 2009; 36: 4197-212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392
- Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys 2009; 36: 5359-73. doi: 10.1118/1.3238104
- Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA TRS-398. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
- Smilović Radojčić Đ, Švabić Kolacio M, Radojčić M, Rajlić D, Casar B, Faj D, et al. Comparison of calculated dose distributions reported as dose-to-water and dose-to-medium for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Med Dos 2018; 43: 363-9. doi: 10.1016/j. meddos.2017.11.008
- Palmans H, Andreo P, Huq MS, Christaki K, Alfonso R, Izewska J, et al. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination. Technical Report Series No. 483. IAEA TRS483. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2017. doi: 10.1002/mp.13208
- Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurkovic S, Huq MS. A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys 2019; 46: 944-63. doi: 10.1002/mp.13318
- Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurkovic S, Huq MS. Output correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallel. Med Phys 2020; 47: 242-59. doi: 10.1002/mp.13894
Language: English
Page range: 495 - 504
Submitted on: Jun 10, 2020
Accepted on: Jul 9, 2020
Published on: Sep 16, 2020
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Djeni Smilovic Radojcic, Bozidar Casar, David Rajlic, Manda Svabic Kolacio, Ignasi Mendez, Nevena Obajdin, Dea Dundara Debeljuh, Slaven Jurkovic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.