Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the training program for p16/ Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining interpretation for laboratory staff without experience in cervical cytology and immunocytochemistry Cover

Evaluation of the training program for p16/ Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining interpretation for laboratory staff without experience in cervical cytology and immunocytochemistry

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Waldstrøm M, Christensen RK, Ørnskov D. Evaluation of p16 INK4a/Ki-67 dual stain in comparison with an mRNA human papillomavirus test on liquid-based cytology samples with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cancer Cytopathol 2013; 121: 136-45. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21233
  2. Wentzensen N, Fetterman B, Tougawa D, Shiffman M, Castle PE, Wood SN, et al. Interobserver reproducibility and accuracy of p16/Ki67 dual-stain cytology in cervical cancer screening. Cancer Cytopathol 2014; 122: 914-20. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21473
  3. Allia E, Ronco G, Coccia A, Luparia P, Macrì L, Fiorito C, et al. Interpretation of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual immunostaining for the triage of human papilloma-virus-positive women by experts and nonexperts in cervical cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 123: 212-8. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21511
  4. McMenamin M, McKenna M, McDowell A, Dawson C, McKenna R. Intra-and inter-observer reproducibility of CINtecR PLUS in ThinPrep cytology preparations. Cytopathology 2017; 28: 284-90. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12426
  5. Benevolo M, Allia E, Gustinucci D, Rollo F, Bulletti S, Cesarini E, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of cytologic p16INK4a /Ki-67 dual immunostaining in human papillomavirus-positive women. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125: 212-20. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21800
  6. Kloboves Prevodnik V, Jerman T, Nolde N, Repše Fokter A, Jezeršek J, Pohar Marinšek Ž, et al. Interobserver variability and accuracy of p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining on conventional cervical smears. Diagn Pathol 2019; 14: 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0821-5
  7. Ivanus U, Jerman T, Fokter AR, Takac I, Prevodnik VK, Marcec M, et al. Randomised trial of HPV self-sampling among non-attenders in the Slovenian cervical screening programme ZORA: comparing three different screening approaches. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52: 399-412. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0036
  8. R Core Team. The R project for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. [cited 2019 Dec 15]. Avalable at http://www.R-project.org/
  9. National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Trend Analysis Software. Joinpoint Regression Program, Version 4.6.0.0 - April 2018; Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program.
  10. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1991.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 208
Submitted on: Jan 22, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 4, 2020
Published on: Mar 26, 2020
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik, Ziva Pohar Marinsek, Janja Zalar, Hermina Rozina, Nika Kotnik, Tine Jerman, Jerneja Varl, Urska Ivanus, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.