Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical relevance of the borderline results of the Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk HPV DNA assay with cervical samples collected in Specimen Transport Medium Cover

Clinical relevance of the borderline results of the Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk HPV DNA assay with cervical samples collected in Specimen Transport Medium

Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. Ursič Vrščaj M, Rakar S, Možina A, Kobal B, Takač I, Deisinger I, et al. [Guidelines for management of women with cervical precancerous lesions]. [Slovenian]. In: Ursic-Vrscaj M, editor. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana; 2011.
  2. Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) High Risk HPV DNA test kit [package insert]. Gaithersburg, MD: Digene; 2004.
  3. Castle PE, Lorincz AT, Mielzynska-Lohnas I, Scott DR, Glass AG, Sherman ME, et al. Results of human papillomavirus DNA testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 assay are reproducible. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 1088-90. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2904
  4. Castle PE, Wheeler CM, Solomon D, Schiffman M, Peyton CL; ALTS Group. Interlaboratory reliability of Hybrid Capture 2. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122: 238-45. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2904
  5. Carozzi FM, Del Mistro A, Confortini M, Sani C, Puliti D, Trevisan R, et al. Reproducibility of HPV DNA testing by Hybrid Capture 2 in a screening setting. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124: 716-21. doi: 10.1309/84E5WHJQHK83BGQD
  6. Seme K, Fujs K, Kocjan BJ, Poljak M. Resolving repeatedly borderline results of Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA Test using polymerase chain reaction and genotyping. J Virol Methods 2006; 134: 252-6. doi: 10.1016/j. jviromet.2005.12.004
  7. Origoni M, Carminati G, Sideri M, Clementi M, Rolla S, Candiani M. “Low-grade positivity” of HPV viral load after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology identifies women at low-risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2012; 33: 261-4. PMID: 22873095
  8. de Cremoux P, Coste J, Sastre-Garau X, Thioux M, Bouillac C, Labbe S, et al. Efficiency of the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120: 492-9. doi: 10.1309/XFUC-PP6M-5XUA-94B8
  9. Muldrew KL, Beqaj SH, Han J, Lum SH, Clinard V, Schultenover SJ, et al. Evaluation of a Digene-recommended algorithm for human papillomavirus low-positive results present in a “retest zone”. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 127: 97-102. doi: 10.1309/4WCPTUV506HLP06P
  10. Rao A, Sandri MT, Sideri M, Young S, Sharma A, Behrens C. Comparison of hybrid capture 2 High-Risk HPV results in the low positive range with cobas® HPV Test results from the ATHENA study. J Clin Virol 2013; 58: 161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.041
  11. Knoepp SM, Kuebler DL, Wilbur DC. Resolution of equivocal results with the Hybrid Capture II high-risk HPV DNA test: a cytologic/histologic review of 191 cases. Diagn Mol Pathol 2007; 16: 125-9. doi: 10.1097/ PDM.0b013e31805c99ae
  12. Knoepp SM, Kuebler DL, Wilbur DC. Correlation between hybrid capture II high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test chemiluminescence intensity from cervical samples with follow-up histologic results: a cytologic/ histologic review of 367 cases. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118: 209-17. doi: 10.1002/cncy.20093
  13. LaMere BJ, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Poitras N, Stanley M, Shieh J, et al. A study of borderline positive Hybrid Capture 2 tests in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California cervical screening program: evidence against retesting. J Virol Methods 2013; 189: 77-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.01.011
  14. Elkins CT, de Vries CE, Stephens J, Suarez AA. Hybrid capture 2 test results after an initial equivocal RLU/CO value are dependent on age. Am J Clin Pathol 2013; 139: 605-10. doi: 10.1309/AJCPARHTB40DTVFV
  15. Ramirez-Hidalgo A, Musset-Biarnes M, Vilamala-Muns M, Laso-Perez E, Serrano-Munne L, Alameda-Quitllet F. Hybrid capture 2 high-risk human papillomavirus test: should “grey zone” results justify repeating the test? Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol 2013; 35: 152-6. PMID: 24344502
  16. de Vries CE, Shen R, Stephens J, Suarez AA. Equivocal and weakly positive hybrid capture 2 test in women aged 50 and older. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40: 708-12. doi: 10.1002/dc.21710
  17. Ivanus U, Jerman T, Fokter AR, Takac I, Prevodnik VK, Marcec M, et al. Randomised trial of HPV self-sampling among non-attenders in the Slovenian cervical screening programme ZORA: comparing three different screening approaches. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52: 399-412. doi: 10.2478/ raon-2018-0036
  18. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH, editors. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. 4th edition. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.
  19. R Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. [cited 2019 May 15]. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/
  20. Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Malila N, Nieminen P, Anttila A, Tarkkanen J, Laurila P, et al. Test positivity cutoff level of a high risk human papillomavirus test could be increased in routine cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2008; 123: 2902-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23839.
  21. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, De Marco L, et al. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 547-55. doi: 10.1016/ S1470-2045(06)70731-8
  22. Ronco G, Segnan N, Giorgi-Rossi P, Zappa M, Casadei GP, Carozzi F, et al. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 765-74. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj209
  23. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, et al. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 492-501. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn065
  24. Sargent A, Bailey A, Turner A, Almonte M, Gilham C, Baysson H, et al. Optimal threshold for a positive hybrid capture 2 test for detection of human papillomavirus: data from the ARTISTIC trial. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48: 554-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00896-09
  25. Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, Putaud I, Mangeonjean C, Lorenzato M, et al. Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 1616-23. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1845
  26. Rijkaart DC, Coupe VM, van Kemenade FJ, Heideman DA, Hesselink AT, Verweij W, et al. Comparison of Hybrid capture 2 testing at different thresholds with cytology as primary cervical screening test. Br J Cancer 2010; 103: 939-46. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605869
  27. Rebolj M, Bonde J, Njor SH, Lynge E. Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review. BMJ 2011; 23: 342. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2757
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2019-0044 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 316 - 322
Submitted on: Jul 10, 2019
|
Accepted on: Aug 6, 2019
|
Published on: Sep 24, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Jerneja Varl, Urska Ivanus, Ziva Pohar Marinsek, Tine Jerman, Anja Ostrbenk Valencak, Mario Poljak, Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.