Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging changes in normal appearing brain tissue after radiotherapy in glioblastoma patients may confound longitudinal evaluation of treatment response Cover

Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging changes in normal appearing brain tissue after radiotherapy in glioblastoma patients may confound longitudinal evaluation of treatment response

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 52 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. Kim JH, Jenrow KA, Brown SL. Mechanisms of radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity and implications for future clinical trials. <em>Radiat Oncol J</em> 2014; <bold>32</bold>: 103-15. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2014.32.3.103" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3857/roj.2014.32.3.103</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Price RE, Langford LA, Jackson EF, Stephens LC, Tinkey PT, Ang KK. Radiation-induced morphologic changes in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) brain. <em>J Med Primatol</em> 2001; <bold>30</bold>: 81-7. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0684.2001.300202.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1034/j.1600-0684.2001.300202.x</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Sundgren PC, Cao Y. Brain irradiation: effects on normal brain parenchyma and radiation injury. <em>Neuroimaging Clin N Am</em> 2009; <bold>19</bold>: 657-68. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.014" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.014</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Greene-Schloesser D, Robbins ME, Peiffer AM, Shaw EG, Wheeler KT, Chan MD. Radiation-induced brain injury: a review. <em>Front Oncol</em> 2012; <bold>2</bold>: 73. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00073" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3389/fonc.2012.00073</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Cao Y, Tsien CI, Sundgren PC, Nagesh V, Normolle D, Buchtel H, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for prediction of radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction. <em>Clin Cancer Res</em> 2009; <bold>15</bold>: 1747-54. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1420" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1420</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Adair JC, Baldwin N, Kornfeld M, Rosenberg GA. Radiation-induced blood-brain barrier damage in astrocytoma: relation to elevated gelatinase B and urokinase. <em>J Neurooncol</em> 1999; <bold>44</bold>: 283-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Fuss M, Wenz F, Scholdei R, Essig M, Debus J, Knopp MV, et al. Radiation-induced regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) changes in normal brain and low-grade astrocytomas: quantification and time and dose-dependent occurrence. <em>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</em> 2000; <bold>48</bold>: 53-8. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00590-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00590-3</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Jakubovic R, Sahgal A, Ruschin M, Pejovic-Milic A, Milwid R, Aviv RI. Non tumor perfusion changes following stereotactic Radiosurgery to brain metastases. <em>Technol Cancer Res Treat</em> 2014. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.7785/tcrtex-press.2013.600279" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7785/tcrtex-press.2013.600279</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Lee MC, Cha S, Chang SM, Nelson SJ. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of radiation effects in normal-appearing brain tissue: changes in the first-pass and recirculation phases. <em>J Magn Reson Imaging</em> 2005; <bold>21</bold>: 683-93. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20298" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/jmri.20298</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Petr J, Platzek I, Seidlitz A, Mutsaerts HJ, Hofheinz F, Schramm G, et al. Early and late effects of radiochemotherapy on cerebral blood flow in glioblastoma patients measured with non-invasive perfusion MRI. <em>Radiother Oncol</em> 2016; <bold>118</bold>: 24-8. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.017" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.017</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Price SJ, Jena R, Green HA, Kirkby NF, Lynch AG, Coles CE, et al. Early radiotherapy dose response and lack of hypersensitivity effect in normal brain tissue: a sequential dynamic susceptibility imaging study of cerebral perfusion. <em>Clin Oncol</em> (<em>R Coll Radiol</em>) 2007; <bold>19</bold>: 577-87. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.010</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Taki S, Higashi K, Oguchi M, Tamamura H, Tsuji S, Ohta K, et al. Changes in regional cerebral blood flow in irradiated regions and normal brain after stereotactic radiosurgery. <em>Ann Nucl Med</em> 2002; <bold>16</bold>: 273-7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Weber MA, Gunther M, Lichy MP, Delorme S, Bongers A, Thilmann C, et al. Comparison of arterial spin-labeling techniques and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in perfusion imaging of normal brain tissue. <em>Invest Radiol</em> 2003; <bold>38</bold>: 712-8. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000084890.57197.54" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1097/01.rli.0000084890.57197.54</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Wenz F, Rempp K, Hess T, Debus J, Brix G, Engenhart R, et al. Effect of radiation on blood volume in low-grade astrocytomas and normal brain tissue: quantification with dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. <em>AJR Am J Roentgenol</em> 1996; <bold>166</bold>: 187-93. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571873" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571873</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Paulson ES, Schmainda KM. Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. <em>Radiology</em> 2008; <bold>249</bold>: 601-13. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492071659" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1148/radiol.2492071659</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Jafari-Khouzani K, Emblem KE, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Bjornerud A, Vangel MG, Gerstner ER, et al.Repeatability of cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in glioblastoma patients. <em>Transl Oncol</em> 2015; <bold>8</bold>: 137-46. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2015.03.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.tranon.2015.03.002</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, Peccerelli N, Chheang S, Gruber ML, et al. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. <em>Radiology</em> 2008; <bold>247</bold>: 490-8. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2472070898" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1148/radiol.2472070898</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Lacerda S, Law M. Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors. <em>Neuroimaging Clin N Am</em> 2009; <bold>19</bold>: 527-57. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.007</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Jarnum H, Steffensen EG, Knutsson L, Frund ET, Simonsen CW, Lundbye-Christensen S, et al. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. <em>Neuroradiology</em> 2010; <bold>52</bold>: 307-17. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s00234-009-0616-6</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Choi SH, Jung SC, Kim KW, Lee JY, Choi Y, Park SH, et al. Perfusion MRI as the predictive/prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab: a systematic review and a time-to-event meta-analysis. <em>J Neurooncol</em> 2016; <bold>128</bold>: 185-94. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2102-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s11060-016-2102-4</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Vogelbaum MA, Jost S, Aghi MK, Heimberger AB, Sampson JH, Wen PY, et al. Application of novel response/progression measures for surgically delivered therapies for gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group. <em>Neurosurgery</em> 2012; <bold>70</bold>: 234-43; discussion 43-4. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318223f5a7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1227/NEU.0b013e318223f5a7</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Tensaouti F, Khalifa J, Lusque A, Plas B, Lotterie JA, Berry I, et al. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, contrast enhancement and perfusion MRI for assessing progression in glioblastoma. <em>Neuroradiology</em> 2017; <bold>59</bold>: 1013-20. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-017-1899-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s00234-017-1899-7</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Bjornerud A, Emblem KE. A fully automated method for quantitative cerebral hemodynamic analysis using DSC-MRI. <em>J Cereb Blood Flow Metab</em> 2010; <bold>30</bold>: 1066-78. Epub 2010/01/21. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2010.4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1038/jcbfm.2010.4</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Knutsson L, Stahlberg F, Wirestam R. Absolute quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: pitfalls and possibilities. <em>MAGMA</em> 2010; <bold>23</bold>: 1-21. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-009-0190-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10334-009-0190-2</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L, Ostergaard L. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. <em>Magn Reson Med</em> 2006; <bold>55</bold>: 524-31. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20759" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/mrm.20759</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Petersen ET, Zimine I, Ho YC, Golay X. Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. <em>Br J Radiol</em> 2006; <bold>79</bold>: 688-701. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/67705974" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1259/bjr/67705974</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Emblem KE, Bjornerud A. An automatic procedure for normalization of cerebral blood volume maps in dynamic susceptibility contrast-based glioma imaging. <em>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</em> 2009; <bold>30</bold>: 1929-32. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1680" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3174/ajnr.A1680</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. <em>N Engl J Med</em> 2005; <bold>352</bold>: 987-96. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1056/NEJMoa043330</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Ostergaard L. Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. <em>J Magn Reson Imaging</em> 2005; <bold>22</bold>: 710-7. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20460" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/jmri.20460</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Simonsen CZ, Ostergaard L, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Rohl L, Bjornerud A, Gyldensted C. CBF and CBV measurements by USPIO bolus tracking: reproducibility and comparison with Gd-based values. <em>J Magn Reson Imaging</em> 1999; <bold>9</bold>: 342-7. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199902)9:2&lt" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199902)9:2&lt</a>;342::AID-JMRI29&gt;3.0.CO;2-B</pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Emblem KE, Bjornerud A, Mouridsen K, Borra RJ, Batchelor TT, Jain RK, et al. T(1)- and T(2)(<sup>∗</sup>)-dominant extravasation correction in DSC-MRI: part II-predicting patient outcome after a single dose of cediranib in recurrent glioblastoma patients. <em>J Cereb Blood Flow Metab</em> 2011; <bold>31</bold>: 2054-64. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2011.39" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1038/jcbfm.2011.39</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results. <em>Magn Reson Med</em> 1996; <bold>36</bold>: 726-36. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910360511" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/mrm.1910360511</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization. <em>Magn Reson Med</em> 2003; <bold>50</bold>: 1237-47. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10643" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/mrm.10643</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Weisskoff RM. Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. <em>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</em> 2006; <bold>27</bold>: 859-67.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Emblem KE, Due-Tonnessen P, Hald JK, Bjornerud A. Automatic vessel removal in gliomas from dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. <em>Magn Reson Med</em> 2009; <bold>61</bold>: 1210-7. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21944" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/mrm.21944</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. <em>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</em> 2010; 29: 196-205. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. White CM, Pope WB, Zaw T, Qiao J, Naeini KM, Lai A, et al. Regional and voxel-wise comparisons of blood flow measurements between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in brain tumors. <em>J Neuroimaging</em> 2014; <bold>24</bold>: 23-30. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00703.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00703.x</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Jonsson C, Pagani M, Johansson L, Thurfjell L, Jacobsson H, Larsson SA. Reproducibility and repeatability of 99Tcm-HMPAO rCBF SPET in normal subjects at rest using brain atlas matching. <em>Nucl Med Commun</em> 2000; <bold>21</bold>: 9-18.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Li YQ, Chen P, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Reilly RM, Wong CS. Endothelial apoptosis initiates acute blood-brain barrier disruption after ionizing radiation. <em>Cancer Res</em> 2003; <bold>63</bold>: 5950-6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Lyubimova N, Hopewell JW. Experimental evidence to support the hypothesis that damage to vascular endothelium plays the primary role in the development of late radiation-induced CNS injury. <em>Br J Radiol</em> 2004; <bold>77</bold>: 488-92. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/15169876" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1259/bjr/15169876</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Cao Y, Tsien CI, Shen Z, Tatro DS, Ten Haken R, Kessler ML, et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to assess blood-brain/blood-glioma barrier opening during conformal radiotherapy. <em>J Clin Oncol</em> 2005; <bold>23</bold>: 4127-36. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.07.144" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1200/JCO.2005.07.144</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Brown WR, Thore CR, Moody DM, Robbins ME, Wheeler KT. Vascular damage after fractionated whole-brain irradiation in rats. <em>Radiat Res</em> 2005; <bold>164</bold>: 662-8.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Coderre JA, Morris GM, Micca PL, Hopewell JW, Verhagen I, Kleiboer BJ, et al. Late effects of radiation on the central nervous system: role of vascular endothelial damage and glial stem cell survival. <em>Radiat Res</em> 2006; <bold>166</bold>: 495-503. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3597.1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1667/RR3597.1</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Wong CS, Van der Kogel AJ. Mechanisms of radiation injury to the central nervous system: implications for neuroprotection. <em>Mol Interv</em> 2004; <bold>4</bold>: 273-84. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1124/mi.4.5.7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1124/mi.4.5.7</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Yuan H, Gaber MW, Boyd K, Wilson CM, Kiani MF, Merchant TE. Effects of fractionated radiation on the brain vasculature in a murine model: blood-brain barrier permeability, astrocyte proliferation, and ultrastructural changes. <em>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</em> 2006; <bold>66</bold>: 860-6. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.043" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.043</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Prust MJ, Jafari-Khouzani K, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Polaskova P, Batchelor TT, Gerstner ER, et al. Standard chemoradiation for glioblastoma results in progressive brain volume loss. <em>Neurology</em> 2015; <bold>85</bold>: 683-91. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001861" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1212/WNL.0000000000001861</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Karunamuni RA, Moore KL, Seibert TM, Li N, White NS, Bartsch H, et al. Radiation sparing of cerebral cortex in brain tumor patients using quantitative neuroimaging. <em>Radiother Oncol</em> 2016; <bold>118</bold>: 29-34. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.003</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Petr J, Platzek I, Hofheinz F, Mutsaerts H, Asllani I, van Osch MJP, et al. Photon vs. proton radiochemotherapy: effects on brain tissue volume and perfusion. <em>Radiother Oncol</em> 2018. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.033" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.033</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Karunamuni R, Bartsch H, White NS, Moiseenko V, Carmona R, Marshall DC, et al. Dose-dependent cortical thinning after partial brain irradiation in highgrade glioma. <em>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</em> 2016; <bold>94</bold>: 297-304. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.026" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.026</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Andre JB, Nagpal S, Hippe DS, Ravanpay AC, Schmiedeskamp H, Bammer R, et al. Cerebral blood flow changes in glioblastoma patients undergoing bevacizumab treatment are seen in both tumor and normal brain. [Abstract] <em>Neuroradiol J</em> 2015; <bold>28</bold>: 112-9. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400915576641" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1971400915576641</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Mouridsen K, Emblem K, Bjørnerud A, Jennings D, Sorensen AG. Subject-specific AIF optimizes reproducibility of perfusion parameters in longitudinal DSC-MRI. <em>Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med</em> 2011; <bold>19</bold>: 376.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 143 - 151
Submitted on: Jan 17, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 4, 2018
Published on: Jun 6, 2018
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
perfusion MRI,
radiation-induced changes,
normal-appearing brain tissue,
malignant gliomas
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Internal medicine,
Haematology, oncology,
Radiology

© 2018 Markus Fahlström, Erik Blomquist, Tufve Nyholm, Elna-Marie Larsson, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 52 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)Next article