Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sclerosing melanocytic lesions (sclerosing melanomas with nevoid features and sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features) – an analysis of 90 lesions Cover

Sclerosing melanocytic lesions (sclerosing melanomas with nevoid features and sclerosing nevi with pseudomelanomatous features) – an analysis of 90 lesions

Open Access
|Jan 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Sclerosing melanocytic nevus from the abdomen of a 22-year-old woman, with negative FISH assay. (A) There is a trizonal pattern, maturation and an atypical intraepidermal component above the sclerosis, which does not extend beyond the sclerosis. (B) HMB-45 stain shows maturation in the dermal component.
Sclerosing melanocytic nevus from the abdomen of a 22-year-old woman, with negative FISH assay. (A) There is a trizonal pattern, maturation and an atypical intraepidermal component above the sclerosis, which does not extend beyond the sclerosis. (B) HMB-45 stain shows maturation in the dermal component.

Figure 2

Sclerosing melanocytic nevus from the abdomen of a 53-year-old man, with negative the FISH assay. (A), (B) There is lamellar-type sclerosis involving the entire dermal component.
Sclerosing melanocytic nevus from the abdomen of a 53-year-old man, with negative the FISH assay. (A), (B) There is lamellar-type sclerosis involving the entire dermal component.

Figure 3

Sclerosing melanoma from the abdomen of a 67-year-old man. (A) There are remnants of a nevus below the melanoma (arrow) and a trizonal pattern. (B) Some melanocytes are in the epithelium of an eccrine duct (arrow). (C) Melanocytes within sclerosis are atypical, with prominent nucleoli. (D) There is a mitotic figure (arrow). (E) HMB-45 staining is irregular diffuse in the sclerotic dermal component (melanoma) but negative in the nevus below (arrow). There is prominent pagetoid spread in the epidermis. (F) The FISH assay was positive, showing loss of MYB (gold) relative to CEP6 (aqua) in 57% of tumor cell nuclei.
Sclerosing melanoma from the abdomen of a 67-year-old man. (A) There are remnants of a nevus below the melanoma (arrow) and a trizonal pattern. (B) Some melanocytes are in the epithelium of an eccrine duct (arrow). (C) Melanocytes within sclerosis are atypical, with prominent nucleoli. (D) There is a mitotic figure (arrow). (E) HMB-45 staining is irregular diffuse in the sclerotic dermal component (melanoma) but negative in the nevus below (arrow). There is prominent pagetoid spread in the epidermis. (F) The FISH assay was positive, showing loss of MYB (gold) relative to CEP6 (aqua) in 57% of tumor cell nuclei.

Figure 4

Sclerosing melanoma from the back of a 70-year-old female. (A) There are remnants of a nevus below sclerosis (arrow). (B) Melanocytes in the sclerosis do not show maturation and (C) are larger with irregular nuclei and prominent nucleoli compared to melanocytes in the adjacent nevus (left). (D) HMB-45 stain shows pagetoid spread in the epidermis, but is completely negative in the dermis. (E) Ki67 (brown)/melan A (red) shows no proliferative activity in the melanocytes in the deepest aspect of the sclerotic component; note less intense melan A positivity in the nevus below the melanoma (arrow). (F) The FISH assay was positive, showing gain in RREB1 (red) in 30% of tumor cell nuclei.
Sclerosing melanoma from the back of a 70-year-old female. (A) There are remnants of a nevus below sclerosis (arrow). (B) Melanocytes in the sclerosis do not show maturation and (C) are larger with irregular nuclei and prominent nucleoli compared to melanocytes in the adjacent nevus (left). (D) HMB-45 stain shows pagetoid spread in the epidermis, but is completely negative in the dermis. (E) Ki67 (brown)/melan A (red) shows no proliferative activity in the melanocytes in the deepest aspect of the sclerotic component; note less intense melan A positivity in the nevus below the melanoma (arrow). (F) The FISH assay was positive, showing gain in RREB1 (red) in 30% of tumor cell nuclei.

Clinical and histopathologic parameters in relation to morphological diagnostic categories

Parameter, n (%)AllNevusMelanomaMelanoma with nevusP -value
N (%)9026 (29)19 (21)45 (50)
Age of the patients (years) (median; range)48; 21-8938; 22-5360; 21-8951; 26-85< 0.001
Maximum diameter

available for 81 lesions

(mm) (median; range)
9; 2-297; 2-148; 3-2911; 4-250.014
Location 0.076
Back46 (51)9 (35)9 (47)28 (62)
Other44 (49)17 (65)10 (53)17 (38)
Extension along eccrine ducts

no eccrine ducts were identified within or adjacent to sclerotic dermal component in 13 lesions

49/77 (64)5/21 (24)14/17 (82)30/39 (77)< 0.001
Evidence of regression29 (32)1 (4)12 (63)16 (36)/
Lamellar sclerosis8 (9)6 (23)02 (4)/
Marked inflammation in the sclerosis27 (30)2 (8)6 (32)19 (42)/
Maturation in the sclerosis50 (56)25 (96)8 (42)17 (38)/
Dermal mitoses present18 (20)1 (4)4 (21)13 (29)/
Prominent nucleoli in the sclerosis52 (58)5 (19)16 (84)31 (69)/
Intraepidermal component adjacent to the sclerosis /
Not atypical18 (20)17 (65)1 (5)0
Atypical17 (19)9 (35)1 (5)7 (16)
Melanoma in situ55 (61)017 (89)38 (84)
Severe cytological atypia in the epidermis above the sclerosis68 (76)9 (35)19 (100)40 (89)/
Lentiginous growth above the sclerosis82 (91)19 (73)19 (100)44 (98)/
Upward migration in the epidermis above the sclerosis /
No12 (13)9 (35)1 (5)2 (4)
Lower half11 (12)7 (27)1 (5)3 (7)
Focally in the upper half23 (26)9 (35)5 (26)9 (20)
Prominent full thickness44 (48)1 (4)12 (63)31 (69)
HMB-45 in the sclerotic component60191130/
Patchy, irregular37 (62)6 (32)10 (91)21 (70)
Maturation or completely absent23 (38)13 (68)1 (9)9 (30)
Ki67 in the sclerotic component66191334
No positivity in the lower half51 (77)19 (100)8 (62)24 (71)/
Some positive melanocytes in the lower half, <5% overall13 (20)04 (31)9 (26)
>5%, no gradient with the depth2 (3)01 (7)1 (3)
Four-probe FISH in the sclerotic component41167180.001
Positive14 (34)03 (43)11 (61)
Negative27 (66)16 (100)4 (57)7 (39)

Clinical and histopathologic parameters in relation to FISH results in 41 lesions with FISH analysis of the sclerotic component

Parameter, n (%)AllFISH-positiveFISH-negativeP -value
N (%)411427
Age of the patients (years) (median; range)48; 22-8951; 42-8948; 22-770.196
Thickness of sclerosis (mm) (mean; range)0.85; 0.5-1.51.0; 0.7-1.50.8; 0.5-1.30.002
Location 0.096
Back25 (61)11 (79)14 (52)
Other16 (39)3 (21)13 (48)
Extension along eccrine ducts21/38 (55)11/14 (71)10/24 (42)0.026
Evidence of regression8 (20)4 (29)4 (15)0.411
Maturation in the sclerosis29 (71)7 (50)22 (81)0.068
Dermal mitoses present10 (24)5 (36)5 (19)0.267
Prominent nucleoli in the sclerosis20 (49)11 (79)9 (33)0.009
Melanoma in situ adjacent to the sclerosis23 (56)13 (93)10 (39)0.001
Severe cytological atypia in the epidermis above the sclerosis27 (66)12 (86)15 (56)0.053
Prominent full thickness upward migration in the epidermis above the sclerosis19 (22)10 (71)9 (33)0.026
Patchy irregular HMB-45 in the sclerotic component22/38 (58)11/13 (85)11/25 (44)0.016
No Ki67 positivity in the lower half of the sclerotic component28/39 (72)7/14 (50)21/25 (84)0.033
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2018-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Language: English
Page range: 220 - 228
Submitted on: Oct 17, 2017
Accepted on: Dec 20, 2017
Published on: Jan 24, 2018
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2018 Biljana Grcar-Kuzmanov, Emanuela Bostjancic, Juan Antonio Contreras Bandres, Joze Pizem, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.