Enhancing Organizational Agility in Traditional Corporations: A Strategic Intervention Model Based on Galbraith’s Star Model and Consumer Psychology Insights

Kafoe, Alieu Stephen

doi:10.2478/raft-2025-0005

Abstract

This study examines the challenges faced by traditional corporations in maintaining agility and competitiveness in rapidly evolving markets, focusing on TechGiant Corporation as a case study. The study identifies critical obstacles within hierarchical organizational structures using a qualitative research approach, including a mini-design ethnography and literature review. The research applies Galbraith’s Star Model as a theoretical framework to propose a comprehensive strategic intervention addressing structure, processes, rewards, people, and strategy. The intervention aims to enhance organizational agility and innovation capacity while maintaining stability. The study also integrates insights from consumer psychology to align internal changes with market demands. Preliminary results indicate improvements in product launch frequency and time-to-market metrics, demonstrating the practical implications of the research. Limitations include the single case focus and time constraints of the ethnographic study. Future research directions are suggested, including longitudinal studies and multi-case analyses across diverse industries.

References

Achar, C., So, J., Agrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2016). What we feel and why we buy: the influence of emotions on consumer decision-making. Current opinion in psychology, 10, 166-170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2016.01.009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ahmed, P. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, 30-43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601069810199131.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do. California Management Review, 40 (1), 39-58.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Amabile, T., & Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press, a member of the Perseus Books Group.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bass, B.M., & Riggio, R.E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bican, P., Guderian, C., & Ringbeck, A. (2015). Intellectual property: Tension on Open Innovation?. 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1026-1035. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273140.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burke, A.E., Van Stel, A., & Thurik, R. (2009). Blue Ocean versus Competitive Strategy: Theory and Evidence. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2009-030-ORG.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chang, A., Lee, T., Lee, H., & Wang, J. (2023). The influence of responsible leadership on strategic agility: cases from the taiwan hospitality industry. Sustainability, 15 (3), 2760. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032760.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 3-28.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D.M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39 (6), 699-709.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87-108.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dingsøyr, T., Strode, D., & Lindsjørn, Y. (2022). Right Thoughts and Right Action: How to Make Agile Teamwork Effective. ArXiv, abs/2207.01895. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.01895.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M.A., & Peteraf, M.A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. British Journal of Management, 20, S1-S8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Galbraith, J.R. (2005). Designing the customer-centric organization: A guide to strategy, structure, and process. John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/202051.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halmaghi, E., & Todăriță, E. (2023). Creating a Learning Culture in the Organisation. Scientific Bulletin, 28, 210-214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsaft-2023-0021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hobbs, B., & Petit, Y. (2017). Agile methods on large projects in large organizations. Project Management Journal, 48 (3), 3-19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84 (3), 58-66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jiji, S.S., & N, D.V. (2024). Organizational culture and individual innovativeness among employees working in an MNC. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12 (5), 2355-2361. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.62099.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jones-Schenk, J. (2019). 70% Failure Rate: An Imperative for Better Change Management. Journal of continuing education in nursing, 50 (4), 148-149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20190319-03.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jooss, S., Collings, D.G., McMackin, J., & Dickmann, M. (2023). A skills-matching perspective on talent management: developing strategic agility. Human Resource Management, 63 (1), 141-157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22192.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jun, K., & Lee, J. (2023). Transformational Leadership and Followers’ Innovative Behavior: Roles of Commitment to Change and Organizational Support for Creativity. Behavioral Sciences, 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040320.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kettunen, P., & Laanti, M. (2017). Future software organizations – agile goals and roles. European Journal of Futures Research, 5, 1-15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40309-017-0123-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R. (2015). Blue Ocean Strategy, Expanded Edition: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kotter, J.P. (2014). Accelerate: Building strategic agility for a faster-moving world. Harvard Business Review Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuczmarski, S., & Kuczmarski, T. (2019). How rewards fuel or fail innovation. Strategic HR Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-11-2018-0091.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lerner, J., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66, 799-823. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manso, G. (2017). Creating Incentives for Innovation. California Management Review, 60, 18-32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617725287.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Priem, R.L., & Butler, J.E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 22-40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rigby, D.K., Sutherland, J., & Noble, A. (2018). Agile at scale. Harvard Business Review, 96 (3), 88-96.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rigby, D.K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2016). Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review, 94 (5), 40-50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rožman, M., Tominc, P., & Štrukelj, T. (2023). Competitiveness through development of strategic talent management and agile management ecosystems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24 (3), 373-393.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sarfraz, M., Wang, Q., Shah, S.G.M., & Fareed, Z. (2019). Do hierarchical jumps in CEO succession invigorate innovation? Evidence from the Chinese economy. Sustainability, 11 (7), 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shafiabady, N., Hadjinicolaou, N., Din, F.U., Bhandari, B., Wu, R.M.X., & Vakilian, J. (2023). Using artificial intelligence (ai) to predict organizational agility. Plos One, 18 (5), e0283066. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283066.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shams, S.M.R., et al. (2021). Strategic agility in international business: a conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals. Journal of International Management, 27 (1), 100737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100737.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sturmberg, J.P., & Gainsford, L. (2024). Complex adaptive organisations: how three-dimensional visualisations can help to understand their structures and behaviours. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 30 (3), 497-502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13958.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sun, L., Liu, Y., & Xiang, Y. (2024). Research on enterprise full level organizational collaboration model guided by “goal behavior”. Proceedings of the 5th Management Science Informatization and Economic Innovation Development Conference, MSIEID 2023, December. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-12-2023.2344486.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319-1350.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58 (4), 13-35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Venketsamy, A., & Lew, C. (2022). Intrinsic and extrinsic reward synergies for innovative work behavior among South African knowledge workers. Personnel Review, 53 (1), 1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2021-0108.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation, 13-66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waal, A.D., Weaver, M.J., Day, T., & Heijden, B.V.D. (2019). Silo-busting: overcoming the greatest threat to organizational performance. Sustainability, 11 (23), 6860. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236860.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wänke, M. (2008). Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781441605283.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
West, M.A. (2002). Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. Applied Psychology, 51 (3), 355-387. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00951.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wibisono, H., & Supoyo, M. (2023). Business transformation: exploring dynamic capabilities, technological innovation, and competitive advantage through the lens of resource-based view in construction services companies. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1 (3), 263-270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i3.93.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, X., et al. (2024). Cross-level transformation of creativity from entrepreneurs to organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1278996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zakrzewska, M., Jarosz, S., Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Sołtysik, M. (2022). Enterprise agility – its meaning, managerial expectations and barriers to implementation – a survey of three countries. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35 (3), 488-510. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-02-2021-0061.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang, X., Zhang, H., & Song, M. (2019). Does social capital increase innovation speed? Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability, 11 (22), 6432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226432.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2015). How Is Ambidexterity Initiated? The Emergent Charter Definition Process. Organization Science (Providence, R.I.), 26 (4), 1119-1139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0971.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zubaedah, S.Y., & Fontana, A. (2023). The three-lens approach to agility: capturing distinct strategic views on the organization for comprehensive examination of firm agility. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 06 (09). Available at: https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i9-08.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Enhancing Organizational Agility in Traditional Corporations: A Strategic Intervention Model Based on Galbraith’s Star Model and Consumer Psychology Insights

Abstract

Paradigm

My account