Classification of Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Application of a Rural Development Index for Austria and Portugal
References
- Abreu I., Nunes J.M., Mesias F.J., 2019. Can rural development be measured? Design and application of a synthetic index to Portuguese municipalities. Social Indicators Research 145: 1107–1123, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02124-w
- Fura B., Wang Q., 2017. The level of socioeconomic development of EU countries and the state of ISO 14001 certification. Quality & Quantity 51(1): 103–119.
- Good D., 1981. Economic integration and regional development in Austria-Hungary, 1867–1913. In Bairoch P., Lévy-Leboyer M. (eds), Disparities in economic development since the industrial revolution. Macmillan Press Ltd., London: 137–150.
- Harsanyi J.C., Selten R., 1988. A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press, Boston.
- Hwang C., Yoon K., 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications: A state of the art survey, Springer, Berlin.
- Jakubowski A., 2018. Convergence or divergence? Multidimensional analysis of regional development in the new European Union member states. Barometr Regionalny 16(1): 31–40.
- Kilper H. (ed.), 2009. New disparities in spatial development in Europe. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
- Lois-González R., 2007. Designation of marginal and peripheral areas in the geography of different countries. A comparative approach. In: Jones G., Leingruber W., Nel E. (eds), Issues in geographical marginality. Papers presented during the Commission Meetings 2001–2004. Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa: 76–81.
- Malinowski M., 2019. Institutional infrastructure and sustainable development: Analysis of eastern Poland districts. Studia Ekonomiczne 384: 51–69.
- Mayer J., 1981. Regional development in Portugal (1929–1977): An assessment. In Bairoch P., Lévy-Leboyer M. (eds), Disparities in economic development since the industrial revolution. Macmillan Press Ltd., London: 331–345.
- Michalek J., Zarnekow N., 2012. Application of the Rural Development Index to analysis of rural regions in Poland and Slovakia. Social Indicators Research 105: 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9765-6
- Nash J., 1951. Non-cooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics 54(2): 286–295.
- Neufeld M., 2017. Eine Frage des Maßstabs? Zum Verhältnis von Kohäsion und Polarisierung in Europa. Europa Regional 23(4): 15–29.
- OECD 2006. The new rural paradigm: Policies and governance. OECD, Paris.
- OECD 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. OECD, Paris.
- Pawlewicz K., Senetra A., Gwiaździńska-Goraj M., Krupickaitė D., 2020. Differences in the environmental, social and economic development of Polish–Lithuanian trans-border regions. Social Indicators Research, 147(3): 1015–1038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02179-9
- Petrick M., 2013. Reversing the rural race to the bottom: An evolutionary model of neo-endogenous rural development. European Review of Agricultural Economics 40(4): 707–735, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt019
- Stiglitz J., Fitoussi J., Durand M., 2018. Beyond GDP: Measuring what counts for economic and social performance. OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Wink R., Kirchner L., Koch F., 2016. Wirtschafltliche Resilienz in deutschsprachigen Regionen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 14
Submitted on: Mar 26, 2020
Published on: Jun 11, 2020
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2020 Barraí Hennebry, Tadeusz Stryjakiewicz, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.