Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic
By:
References
- Berg N., 2005. Non-Response Bias. In K. Kempf-Leonard, ed. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. London: Academic Press: 865–873. Online:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1691967 (accessed September 25, 2017). - Brown G., Pullar D.V., 2012. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26(2): 231–246.
- Brydon-Miller M., Greenwood D., Maguire P., 2003. Why Action Research? Action Research 1(1): 9–28.
- Cartwright W., 2012. Neocartography: Opportunities, issues and prospects. South African Journal of Geomatics 1(1): 14–31.
- Cinderby S., 1999. Geographic information systems (GIS) for participation: the future of environmental GIS? International Journal of Environment and Pollution 11(3): 304–315.
- Czech Statistical Office, 2013. Census 2011. Online:
https://www.czso.cz/csu/sldb/home (accessed August 3, 2018). - Czech Statistical Office, 2017. Demographic trends. Online:
https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/en/index.jsf?page=profil-uzemi&uzemiprofil=31548&u=__VUZEMI__97__19# (accessed September 22, 2017). - Dunn C.E., 2007. Participatory GIS a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography 31(5): 616–637.
- Huck J., Whyatt D., Coulton P., 2014. Spraycan: A PPGIS for capturing imprecise notions of place. Applied Geography 55: 229–237.
- Jankowski P., Czepkiewicz M., Młodkowski M., Zwoliński Zb., 2016. Geo-questionnaire: A Method and Tool for Public Preference Elicitation in Land Use Planning. Transactions in GIS 20(6): 903–924.
- Lawson A.R., Pakrashi V., Ghosh B., Szeto W.Y., 2013. Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City. Accident; analysis and prevention 50, pp. 499–511.
- Li X., Zhang C., Li W., 2015. Does the Visibility of Greenery Increase Perceived Safety in Urban Areas? Evidence from the Place Pulse 1.0 Dataset. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4(3): 1166–1183.
- Lipscomb S., 2014. Visualizing Perceived Safety in a Campus Environment. Online:
http://www.imagin.org/awards/sppc/2014/papers/sam_lipscomb.pdf (accessed December 1, 2015). - Lissner L., Skoog I., Andersson K., Beckman N., Sundh V., Waern M., Zylberstein D.E., Bengtsson C., Björkelund C., 2003. Participation bias in longitudinal studies: experience from the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 21(4): 242–247.
- Melas P., Correndo G., Middleton L., Sabeur Z.A., 2015. Advanced Data Analytics and Visualisation for the Management of Human Perception of Safety and Security in Urban Spaces. In: R. Denzer, R.M. Argent, G. Schimak, J. Hřebíček (eds.), Environmental Software Systems. Infrastructures, Services and Applications. ISESS 2015. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer, Cham, v. 448: 445–454.
- Pánek J., 2016. From Mental Maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal 53(4): 300–307. DOI: 10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862.
- Pánek J., Mařincová L., Putalová L., Hájek J., Marek L., 2017b. Crowdsourcing of environmental health quality perceptions: A pilot study of Kroměříž, Czech Republic. In: M. Leitner, J.J. Arsanjani (eds.), Citizen Empowered Mapping. Geotechnologies and the Environment, Springer, Cham, v. 18: 261–280.
- Pánek J., Pászto V., 2017. Crowdsourcing mapping and participatory planning support system: Case study of Brno, Czechia. In: M. Paterson (ed.), In: Peterson M. (eds.) Advances in Cartography and GIScience. ICACI 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham: 61–73.
- Pánek J., Pászto V., Marek L., 2017a. Mapping emotions: spatial distribution of safety perception in the city of Olomouc. In: I. Ivan, A. Singleton, J. Horák, T. Inspektor (eds.), The Rise of Big Spatial Data. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham: 211–224.
- Pánek J., Pászto V., Šimáček P., 2018. Spatial and Temporal Comparison of Safety Perception in Urban Spaces. Case Study of Olomouc, Opava and Jihlava. In: I. Ivan, J. Horák, T. Inspektor (eds.), Dynamics in GIscience. GIS Ostrava 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham: 333–346. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61297-3_24.
- Patryn L., 1912. Der Ergebnisse der Volkszählung vom 31. Dezember 1910 in Schlesien. Online:
www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/11734?id=11734 (accessed September 22, 2017). - Rød J.K., Ormeling F., Van Elzakker C., 2001. An agenda for democratising cartographic visualisation. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 55(1): 38–41.
- Salesses P., Schechtner K., Hidalgo C.A., 2013. The Collaborative Image of the City: Mapping the Inequality of Urban Perception. PLOS ONE 8(7): e68400.
- Traunmueller M., Marshall P., Capra L., 2015. Crowdsourcing Safety Perceptions of People: Opportunities and Limitations. In: T.Y. Liu, C. Scollon, W. Zhu (eds.), Social Informatics. SocInfo 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham, v.9471: 120–135.
Language: English
Page range: 151 - 162
Submitted on: Dec 3, 2017
Published on: Sep 6, 2018
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2018 Jiří Pánek, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.