Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Peri-Urban Development as a Significant Rural Development Trend Cover

Peri-Urban Development as a Significant Rural Development Trend

Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 37 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)
By: Jadwiga Biegańska,  Stefania Środa-Murawska,  Zenija Kruzmetra and  Frank Swiaczny  
Open Access
|Apr 2018

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Population changes in Germany, Latvia and Poland: 1990–2017 (1990 = 100%).Source: author’s own based on data derived from Eurostat.
Population changes in Germany, Latvia and Poland: 1990–2017 (1990 = 100%).Source: author’s own based on data derived from Eurostat.

Fig. 2

Long-term internal and international migration around urban centres in Latvia: 2005–2011.Source: Kruzmetra 2011; Rasnaca, Kruzmetra 2014.
Long-term internal and international migration around urban centres in Latvia: 2005–2011.Source: Kruzmetra 2011; Rasnaca, Kruzmetra 2014.

Fig. 3

Complexity of migration flows in the peri-urban zone of Riga.Source: Kruzmetra 2011 according to data from Latvia CSB.
Complexity of migration flows in the peri-urban zone of Riga.Source: Kruzmetra 2011 according to data from Latvia CSB.

Fig. 4

Population changes in rural areas in Poland (2005–2011 in relation to 1999–2004; 1999–2004 considered as 100%).Source: Biegańska 2013; ua – urban areas.
Population changes in rural areas in Poland (2005–2011 in relation to 1999–2004; 1999–2004 considered as 100%).Source: Biegańska 2013; ua – urban areas.

Fig. 5

Migration balance per 1,000 population in rural areas of Poland.Source: author on the basis of data collected from the Local Data Bank, the Central Statistical Office; A – 1999–2004; B – 2005–2011; ua – urban areas.
Migration balance per 1,000 population in rural areas of Poland.Source: author on the basis of data collected from the Local Data Bank, the Central Statistical Office; A – 1999–2004; B – 2005–2011; ua – urban areas.

Fig. 6

Natural increase per 1,000 population in Gemeinde: 1995 and 2012.Source: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, 2017, A – 1995; B – 2012.
Natural increase per 1,000 population in Gemeinde: 1995 and 2012.Source: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, 2017, A – 1995; B – 2012.

Fig. 7

Population changes in Gemeinde: 2011–2014 (2011 = 100%).Source: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, 2017.
Population changes in Gemeinde: 2011–2014 (2011 = 100%).Source: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, 2017.

Fig. 8

Number of new residential buildings completed per 1,000 population in Gemeinden in Germany.Source: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, 2017.
Number of new residential buildings completed per 1,000 population in Gemeinden in Germany.Source: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, 2017.

Motivation to move to peri-urban areas: the case of Latvia_

Till 19911991–2000After 2000
1. Family circumstances1. Family circumstances1. Family circumstances
2. Work2. Housing2. Housing
3. Housing3. Work3. Environment
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 125 - 140
Submitted on: Oct 26, 2017
|
Published on: Apr 26, 2018
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
rural development,
peri-urban development,
rural areas,
socio-demographic changes
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2018 Jadwiga Biegańska, Stefania Środa-Murawska, Zenija Kruzmetra, Frank Swiaczny, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 37 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)Next article